Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:58:05 +0100] rev 22099
test-revert: improve comment
We highlight the behavior tested by each sections. (This is a gratuitous
improvement before significant upgrade of the test and massive refactoring of
the revert code)
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:29:43 +0900] rev 22098
largefiles: synchronize lfdirstate with dirstate after automated committing
Before this patch, after successful "hg rebase" of the revision
removing largefiles, "hg status" may still show ""R" for such
largefiles unexpectedly.
"lfilesrepo.commit" executes the special code path for automated
committing while rebase/transplant, and lfdirstate entries for removed
files aren't updated in this code path, even after successful
committing.
Then, "R" entries still existing in lfdirstate cause unexpected "hg
status" output.
This patch synchronizes lfdirstate with dirstate after automated
committing.
This patch passes False as "normallookup" to "synclfdirstate", because
modified files in "files()" of the recent (= just committed) context
should be "normal"-ed.
This is a temporary way to fix with less changes. For fundamental
resolution of this kind of problems in the future, lfdirstate should
be updated with dirstate simultaneously. Hooking "markcommitted" of
ctx in "localrepository.commitctx" may achieve this.
This problem occurs, only when (1) the parent of the working directory
is rebased and (2) it removes largefiles, because:
- if the parent of the working directory isn't rebased, returning to
the initial revision (= update) after rebase hides this problem
- files added on "other" branch (= rebase target) are treated not as
"added" but as "modified" (= "normal" status and "unset"
timestamp) at merging
This patch tests also the status of added largefile, but it is only
for avoiding regression.
In addition to conditions above, "hg status" must not take existing
files to reproduce this problem, because existing files make
"match._files" not empty in "lfilesrepo.status" code path below:
def sfindirstate(f):
sf = lfutil.standin(f)
dirstate = self.dirstate
return sf in dirstate or sf in dirstate.dirs()
match._files = [f for f in match._files
if sfindirstate(f)]
Not empty "match._files" prevents "status" on lfdirstate from
returning the result containing problematic "R" files.
This is reason why "large1" (removed) and "largeX" (added) are checked
separately in this patch.
Problematic code path in "lfilesrepo.commit" is used also by "hg
transplant", but this problem doesn't occur at "hg transplant",
because invocation of "updatelfiles" after transplant-ing in
"overridetransplant" causes cleaning lfdirstate up.
This patch tests also "hg transplant" as same as "hg rebase", but it
is only for avoiding regression.
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:29:43 +0900] rev 22097
largefiles: drop orphan entries from lfdristat at "hg rollback"
Before this patch, newly added (but not yet committed) largefiles
aren't treated as unknown ("?") after "hg rollback".
After "hg rollback", lfdirstate still contains "A" status entries for
such largefiles, even though corresponding entries for standins are
already dropped from dirstate.
Such "orphan" entries in lfdirstate prevent unknown (large)files in
the working directory from being listed up in "unknown" list. The code
path in "if working" route of "lfilesrepo.status" below drops
largefiles tracked in lfdirstate from "unknown" list:
lfiles = set(lfdirstate._map)
# Unknown files
result[4] = set(result[4]).difference(lfiles)
This patch drops orphan entries from lfdristate at "hg rollback".
This is a temporary way to fix with less changes. For fundamental
resolution of this kind of problems in the future, lfdirstate should
be rollback-ed as a part of transaction, as same as dirstate.
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:29:43 +0900] rev 22096
largefiles: restore R status of removed largefiles correctly at "hg rollback"
Before this patch, removed or forgotten largefiles aren't treated as
removed ("R") after "hg rollback". Removed ones are treated as missing
("!") and forgotten ones are treated as clean ("C") unexpectedly.
"overriderollback" uses "normallookup" to restore status in lfdirstate
for largefiles other than ones not added in rollback-ed revision, but
this isn't correct for removed (or forgotten) largefiles.
This patch uses "lfutil.synclfdirstate" to restore "R" status of
removed (or forgotten) largefiles correctly at "hg rollback".
This is a temporary way to fix with less changes. For fundamental
resolution of this kind of problems in the future, lfdirstate should
be rollback-ed as a part of transaction, as same as dirstate.
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:29:43 +0900] rev 22095
largefiles: factor out synchronization of lfdirstate for future use
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:29:43 +0900] rev 22094
largefiles: put whole rollback-ing process into the same "wlock" scope
Before this patch, there are three distinct "wlock" scopes in
"overriderollback":
1. "localrepository.rollback" via original "rollback" command,
2. "merge.update" for reverting standin files only, and
3. "overriderollback" specific "wlock" scope (to synchronize
largefile dirstate)
But these should be executed in the same "wlock" scope for
consistency.
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Mon, 11 Aug 2014 09:35:24 -0500] rev 22093
tests: use a decorator for hghave checks
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Sun, 10 Aug 2014 23:13:12 -0500] rev 22092
hg-test-mode: colorize HGFOO and TESTFOO environment variables
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Sun, 10 Aug 2014 23:09:23 -0500] rev 22091
unbundle: don't advance bookmarks (
issue4322) (BC)
This behavior didn't make much sense and interacts badly with things
that use unbundle internally like shelve. Presumably, the original
rationale was that since bundles didn't contain bookmarks, this gave a
sense of keeping bookmarks up-to-date like would happen with a
corresponding pull. However, since it only updated the current active
bookmark, and bare update already did that anyway, this is pretty
slim.
Notably, the corresponding test actually works better without this
feature.
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Sun, 10 Aug 2014 15:26:33 -0500] rev 22090
merge with stable