Wed, 12 Jun 2024 11:25:49 +0200 relnotes: add 6.7.4 and warn about 6.7.{1,2,3} stable 6.7.4
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Wed, 12 Jun 2024 11:25:49 +0200] rev 51639
relnotes: add 6.7.4 and warn about 6.7.{1,2,3}
Wed, 12 Jun 2024 02:16:14 +0200 inline-changelog: fix pending transaction visibility when splitting stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 12 Jun 2024 02:16:14 +0200] rev 51638
inline-changelog: fix pending transaction visibility when splitting We move the name back to the expected name of `changelog.i.a`.
Wed, 12 Jun 2024 02:15:20 +0200 inline-changelog: fix a critical bug in write_pending that delete data stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 12 Jun 2024 02:15:20 +0200] rev 51637
inline-changelog: fix a critical bug in write_pending that delete data Since a93e52f0b6ff we no longer use inline-revlog for the changelog. The goal there was to solve the lack of testing for the two variants (inline vs split) and reduce the complexity of the interaction with "diverted-write" on the changelog level. However many existing repository still have inline-changelog and we automatically move them to normal revlog as soon as we have the chances. Unfortunately This conversion is buggy and can result in the destruction of the changelog.i if hook triggers the "write pending" mechanism. The bugs comes from the "revlog splitting" logic and the "write_pending" logic stepping over each other. Ironically the change in a93e52f0b6ff aims at no longer having this kind of problem. This changesets fix this issue and add associated tests. Fixing this reveal that the transaction hooks end up not seeing the pending transaction content, because the name is not right ("changelog.i.s.a" instead of "changelog.i.s") we fix this in the next changeset.
Tue, 11 Jun 2024 03:05:20 +0200 bookmark: fix remote bookmark deletion when the push is raced stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 11 Jun 2024 03:05:20 +0200] rev 51636
bookmark: fix remote bookmark deletion when the push is raced Before this patch, running `hg push -B book` to push the `book` bookmark sideway at the same time as a commit making it moving forward might result in the removal of the bookmark remotely. After this changeset, the push can still be raced, but to remove deletion happens. This is progress.
Tue, 11 Jun 2024 03:03:47 +0200 hooks: add a prewlock and a prelock hooks stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 11 Jun 2024 03:03:47 +0200] rev 51635
hooks: add a prewlock and a prelock hooks This is useful for testing.
Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:14:13 +0200 exchange: fix locking to actually be scoped stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:14:13 +0200] rev 51634
exchange: fix locking to actually be scoped The previous code was taking locks before entering with statements, so exception before the with statement would not release the lock (except for garbage collection). We need to move to a try except here because the logic is more complicated.
Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:13:36 +0200 exchange: fix locking to actually be scoped stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:13:36 +0200] rev 51633
exchange: fix locking to actually be scoped The previous code was taking locks before entering with statements, so exception before the with statement would not release the lock (except for garbage collection).
Wed, 06 Sep 2023 18:23:32 +0200 narrow: add a test for linkrev computation done during widen
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 06 Sep 2023 18:23:32 +0200] rev 51632
narrow: add a test for linkrev computation done during widen This new tests show that the linkrev computed and sent by the server might end up being wrong during a widen operation.
Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:45:57 +0200 obsolete: quote the feature name
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de> [Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:45:57 +0200] rev 51631
obsolete: quote the feature name This makes it at least somewhat clearer that hg is talking about some specific feature and not just outdated code.
Mon, 10 Jun 2024 12:12:56 +0200 branching: merge stable into default
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 10 Jun 2024 12:12:56 +0200] rev 51630
branching: merge stable into default
Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:59:44 +0200 rust-status: sort the failed matches when printing them stable
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:59:44 +0200] rev 51629
rust-status: sort the failed matches when printing them This was making the tests flaky after the recent patch¹ that opened up more of the code to the Rust-augmented status. [1] 865efc020c3355dca1cbaa35db80600009c01dd5
Thu, 23 May 2024 11:05:11 +0200 clonebundles: add missing newline to legacy response
Julien Cristau <jcristau@mozilla.com> [Thu, 23 May 2024 11:05:11 +0200] rev 51628
clonebundles: add missing newline to legacy response This seems to have been removed in 6.5 (likely by 60f9602b413e).
Tue, 07 May 2024 15:15:41 +0400 chistedit: change action for the correct item stable
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Tue, 07 May 2024 15:15:41 +0400] rev 51627
chistedit: change action for the correct item We have an experimental config histedit.later-commits-first from c820866c52f9, and when it's true, the order of commits in histedit UI is reversed, both in text mode and in curses mode. But before this patch key presses in curses mode would change histedit actions in the same old order, i.e. trying to edit the latest commit (which would be first now) would put "edit" action on the last commit in the list. This wasn't a cosmetic issue, histedit would actually proceed to edit the first commit in the list. Let's map rules to display items (hopefully now correctly).
Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:10:35 +0100 dirstate: remove the python-side whitelist of allowed matchers
Arseniy Alekseyev <aalekseyev@janestreet.com> [Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:10:35 +0100] rev 51626
dirstate: remove the python-side whitelist of allowed matchers This whitelist is too permissive because it allows matchers that contain disallowed ones deep inside, for example through `intersectionmatcher`. It is also too restrictive because it doesn't pass through some of the matchers we support, such as `patternmatcher`. It's also unnecessary because unsupported matchers raise `FallbackError` and we fall back anyway. Making this change makes more of the tests use rust code path, and therefore subtly change behavior. For example, rust status in largefiles repos seems to have strange behavior.
Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:53:02 +0100 match: make `was_tampered_with` work recursively
Arseniy Alekseyev <aalekseyev@janestreet.com> [Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:53:02 +0100] rev 51625
match: make `was_tampered_with` work recursively This is useful if we are to use it outside of Rust, when deciding whether or not to do some fast-path operation with a given matcher.
Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:43:42 +0100 largefiles: mark more matchers as having been tampered with
Arseniy Alekseyev <aalekseyev@janestreet.com> [Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:43:42 +0100] rev 51624
largefiles: mark more matchers as having been tampered with These happened to slip through the cracks earlier because they weren't caught by tests. Now that we're enabling rust fast path more widely these start breaking.
Mon, 06 May 2024 18:50:21 +0200 branching: merge stable into default
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Mon, 06 May 2024 18:50:21 +0200] rev 51623
branching: merge stable into default
Mon, 06 May 2024 18:48:37 +0200 Added signature for changeset 028dc3f92dbd stable
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Mon, 06 May 2024 18:48:37 +0200] rev 51622
Added signature for changeset 028dc3f92dbd
Mon, 06 May 2024 18:48:34 +0200 Added tag 6.7.3 for changeset 028dc3f92dbd stable
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Mon, 06 May 2024 18:48:34 +0200] rev 51621
Added tag 6.7.3 for changeset 028dc3f92dbd
Mon, 06 May 2024 17:51:21 +0200 relnotes: add 6.7.3 stable 6.7.3
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Mon, 06 May 2024 17:51:21 +0200] rev 51620
relnotes: add 6.7.3
Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:47:08 +0200 rust: blanket implementation of Graph for Graph references stable
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:47:08 +0200] rev 51619
rust: blanket implementation of Graph for Graph references The need comes from the fact that `AncestorsIterator` and many Graph-related algorithms take ownership of the `Graph` they work with. This, in turn is due to them needing to accept the `Index` instances that are provided by the Python layers (that neither rhg nor `RHGitaly` use, of course): the fact that nowadays the Python layer holds an object that is itself implemented in Rust does not change the core problem that they cannot be tracked by the borrow checker. Even though it looks like cloning `Changelog` would be cheap, it seems hard to guarantee that on the long run. The object is already too rich for us to be comfortable with it, when using references is the most natural and guaranteed way of proceeding. The added test seems a bit superfleous, but it will act as a reminder that this feature is really useful until something in the Mercurial code base actually uses it.
Mon, 06 May 2024 15:30:21 +0200 rust-cpython: don't swallow the dirstate error message stable
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Mon, 06 May 2024 15:30:21 +0200] rev 51618
rust-cpython: don't swallow the dirstate error message In case we do get a dirstate error, we want to get the full error message and not just an opaque `Dirstate error`.
Mon, 06 May 2024 13:07:02 +0200 dirstate-v2: check that root nodes are at the root before writing stable
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Mon, 06 May 2024 13:07:02 +0200] rev 51617
dirstate-v2: check that root nodes are at the root before writing More explanations in the previous changeset.
Mon, 06 May 2024 13:02:52 +0200 dirstate-v2: add check of parent/child nodes being related when writing stable
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Mon, 06 May 2024 13:02:52 +0200] rev 51616
dirstate-v2: add check of parent/child nodes being related when writing This stems from a corruption seen in a private repository. We're not sure of the source of the corruption, and it's very possible that we're seeing compounded effects of multiple writes on a corrupted dirstate. Adding this check is not expensive in itself and large writes of the dirstate are not common. This change does not catch this problem at the root node, the next one will.
Mon, 06 May 2024 16:29:00 +0200 admin-verify: expect a number of errors to be returned stable
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Mon, 06 May 2024 16:29:00 +0200] rev 51615
admin-verify: expect a number of errors to be returned It's the responsibility of the check to handle errors, we only care about the total count to sum up the check's work. We use `admin::verify -c dirstate` to test this path at least somewhat.
Mon, 06 May 2024 16:16:15 +0200 admin-verify: fix error message handling stable
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Mon, 06 May 2024 16:16:15 +0200] rev 51614
admin-verify: fix error message handling `dirstate.verify` used to return tuples but does not anymore, it returns the pre-formatted error message, which is a nicer interface anyway.
Mon, 06 May 2024 12:31:29 +0200 admin-verify: pass p1 down to the dirstate function stable
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Mon, 06 May 2024 12:31:29 +0200] rev 51613
admin-verify: pass p1 down to the dirstate function This was forgotten and can break with certain kinds of corruption.
Mon, 06 May 2024 11:27:29 +0200 Backed out changeset 3e0f86f09f26 stable
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Mon, 06 May 2024 11:27:29 +0200] rev 51612
Backed out changeset 3e0f86f09f26
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -50 -28 +50 +100 +300 tip