Sun, 20 Mar 2011 17:41:09 -0400 dirstate: avoid a race with multiple commits in the same process
Greg Ward <greg@gerg.ca> [Sun, 20 Mar 2011 17:41:09 -0400] rev 13704
dirstate: avoid a race with multiple commits in the same process (issue2264, issue2516) The race happens when two commits in a row change the same file without changing its size, *if* those two commits happen in the same second in the same process while holding the same repo lock. For example: commit 1: M a M b commit 2: # same process, same second, same repo lock M b # modify b without changing its size M c This first manifested in transplant, which is the most common way to do multiple commits in the same process. But it can manifest in any script or extension that does multiple commits under the same repo lock. (Thus, the test script tests both transplant and a custom script.) The problem was that dirstate.status() failed to notice the change to b when localrepo is about to do the second commit, meaning that change gets left in the working directory. In the context of transplant, that means either a crash ("RuntimeError: nothing committed after transplant") or a silently inaccurate transplant, depending on whether any other files were modified by the second transplanted changeset. The fix is to make status() work a little harder when we have previously marked files as clean (state 'normal') in the same process. Specifically, dirstate.normal() adds files to self._lastnormal, and other state-changing methods remove them. Then dirstate.status() puts any files in self._lastnormal into state 'lookup', which will make localrepository.status() read file contents to see if it has really changed. So we pay a small performance penalty for the second (and subsequent) commits in the same process, without affecting the common case. Anything that does lots of status updates and checks in the same process could suffer a performance hit. Incidentally, there is a simpler fix: call dirstate.normallookup() on every file updated by commit() at the end of the commit. The trouble with that solution is that it imposes a performance penalty on the common case: it means the next status-dependent hg command after every "hg commit" will be a little bit slower. The patch here is more complex, but only affects performance for the uncommon case.
Sun, 20 Mar 2011 01:16:57 +0100 changegroupsubset: extranodes are no longer needed
Benoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.org> [Sun, 20 Mar 2011 01:16:57 +0100] rev 13703
changegroupsubset: extranodes are no longer needed
Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:50:22 +0100 strip: remove usage of extranodes
Benoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.org> [Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:50:22 +0100] rev 13702
strip: remove usage of extranodes Instead of computing the exact set of missing revlog revisions, we only compute the set of missing/broken changesets. The resulting bundle can be slightly bigger but we will be able to get rid of the ugly extranodes handling in changegroupsubset.
Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:22:47 +0100 patch: move closefile() into patchfile.close()
Patrick Mezard <pmezard@gmail.com> [Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:22:47 +0100] rev 13701
patch: move closefile() into patchfile.close()
Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:09:44 +0100 patch: inline patchfile.hashlines()
Patrick Mezard <pmezard@gmail.com> [Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:09:44 +0100] rev 13700
patch: inline patchfile.hashlines()
Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:08:44 +0100 patch: fix hunk newlines when parsing hunks, not in iterhunks()
Patrick Mezard <pmezard@gmail.com> [Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:08:44 +0100] rev 13699
patch: fix hunk newlines when parsing hunks, not in iterhunks()
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -6 +6 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip