Sun, 05 Feb 2023 15:38:23 +0100 commit: move the addremove logic around to make the next changeset clearer
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 05 Feb 2023 15:38:23 +0100] rev 50028
commit: move the addremove logic around to make the next changeset clearer Lets do the noise now, without changing any thing. So the new changeset can focus on the actual semantic changes.
Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:46:46 +0100 largefiles: link the core dirstate._changing context to the lfdirstate one
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:46:46 +0100] rev 50027
largefiles: link the core dirstate._changing context to the lfdirstate one This will be much cleaner and safer to make sure the two dirstates are in sync. This way, the large-files dirstate will simply inherit the state of the main dirstate, so if the core code does the right thing, the large-files code should be right too.
Thu, 26 Jan 2023 17:44:27 +0100 dirstate: add a context for tracking files change
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 26 Jan 2023 17:44:27 +0100] rev 50026
dirstate: add a context for tracking files change Let us start to use it. We will enforce it later.
Mon, 13 Feb 2023 21:51:45 +0100 dirstate: invalidate the dirstate change on transaction failure
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 13 Feb 2023 21:51:45 +0100] rev 50025
dirstate: invalidate the dirstate change on transaction failure If the change context lives inside a transaction, the change are not flushed to disk on exit as this is delegated to the transaction. As a result we should also delegate the part that do cleanup on failure. The issue was caught by tests with other change, but it seems useful to fix this as soon as possible.
Thu, 26 Jan 2023 17:16:24 +0100 dirstate: factor the "changing" context logic out
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 26 Jan 2023 17:16:24 +0100] rev 50024
dirstate: factor the "changing" context logic out This makes it reusable for other types of changes.
Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:50:45 +0100 dirstate: introduce a `is_changing_any` property
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:50:45 +0100] rev 50023
dirstate: introduce a `is_changing_any` property This will embrace other cases than changing parents.
Mon, 30 Jan 2023 19:21:34 +0100 dirstate: rename `pendingparentchange` to `is_changing_parents`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 30 Jan 2023 19:21:34 +0100] rev 50022
dirstate: rename `pendingparentchange` to `is_changing_parents` This is clearer and more inline witht he other change we did.
Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:50:36 +0100 dirstate: rename _parentwriters to _changing_level
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:50:36 +0100] rev 50021
dirstate: rename _parentwriters to _changing_level We will have context for changing more than parents, so lets be prepared.
Sun, 05 Feb 2023 12:14:45 +0100 largefiles: remove the `changing_parents` context in `openlfdirstate`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 05 Feb 2023 12:14:45 +0100] rev 50020
largefiles: remove the `changing_parents` context in `openlfdirstate` This code might run in any kind of change context, we should rely on the higher level context instead of opening our own.
Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:57:16 +0100 largefiles: remove the second `changing_parents` in `updatelfiles`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:57:16 +0100] rev 50019
largefiles: remove the second `changing_parents` in `updatelfiles` Now that the `update_file` call have been migrated, we can drop the semantically-wrong `changing_parents` context.
Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:55:44 +0100 largefiles: remove the first `changing_parents` in `updatelfiles`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:55:44 +0100] rev 50018
largefiles: remove the first `changing_parents` in `updatelfiles` Now that the `update_file` call have been migrated, we can drop the semantically-wrong `changing_parents` context.
Sun, 05 Feb 2023 09:25:23 +0100 largefiles: use `hacky_extension_update_file` in `updatelfiles`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 05 Feb 2023 09:25:23 +0100] rev 50017
largefiles: use `hacky_extension_update_file` in `updatelfiles` This is what the function is meant for.
Sun, 05 Feb 2023 08:38:43 +0100 largefiles: use `hacky_extension_update_file` in `synclfdirstate`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 05 Feb 2023 08:38:43 +0100] rev 50016
largefiles: use `hacky_extension_update_file` in `synclfdirstate` This is what the function is meant for.
Sun, 05 Feb 2023 08:37:33 +0100 largefiles: use `hacky_extension_update_file` in `openlfdirstate`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 05 Feb 2023 08:37:33 +0100] rev 50015
largefiles: use `hacky_extension_update_file` in `openlfdirstate` This is what the function is meant for.
Sat, 04 Feb 2023 09:08:26 +0100 win32text: make the hacky call cover more cases
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 04 Feb 2023 09:08:26 +0100] rev 50014
win32text: make the hacky call cover more cases Now that I understand what this is doing, It seems like the case for `p1_tracked` were covered by neither the code nor the test. Now the code cover it at least.
Wed, 25 Jan 2023 12:47:55 +0100 win32text: drop the `changing_parents` context in revert upgrade
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 25 Jan 2023 12:47:55 +0100] rev 50013
win32text: drop the `changing_parents` context in revert upgrade We are not changing parents here, so let us not pretend we do.
Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:29:39 +0100 win32text: clean up and clarify the post-revert hack of dirstate
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:29:39 +0100] rev 50012
win32text: clean up and clarify the post-revert hack of dirstate The change is unrelated to changing parents and should not be a in a "changing_parents" context. This call is quite hacky, but now it is at least explicitly hacky. We will drop the `changing_parents` context in the next changesets, but we kept this change simple to help readability.
Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:26:08 +0100 dirstate: introduce a `hacky_extension_update_file` method
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:26:08 +0100] rev 50011
dirstate: introduce a `hacky_extension_update_file` method See inline documentation for details.
Tue, 07 Feb 2023 09:36:35 +0100 mq: properly take the wlock during the full qfold operation
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 07 Feb 2023 09:36:35 +0100] rev 50010
mq: properly take the wlock during the full qfold operation Otherwise the operation could be raced… for unknown result.
Sat, 04 Feb 2023 11:46:57 +0100 locking: hold the wlock for the full duration of the "keyword demo"
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 04 Feb 2023 11:46:57 +0100] rev 50009
locking: hold the wlock for the full duration of the "keyword demo" The risk of racing the demo is low, since it seems to create its own repository on the fly. However it is clearer and more consistent.
Sun, 05 Feb 2023 16:54:26 +0100 locking: grab the wlock before touching the dirstate in `perfdirstatewrite`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 05 Feb 2023 16:54:26 +0100] rev 50008
locking: grab the wlock before touching the dirstate in `perfdirstatewrite` If we touch the dirstate, we should hold the `wlock`.
Tue, 13 Dec 2022 04:22:19 +0100 locking: take the `wlock` for the full `hg addremove` duration
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 13 Dec 2022 04:22:19 +0100] rev 50007
locking: take the `wlock` for the full `hg addremove` duration Otherwise, there is a race condition window between the time we resolve the file to addremove with the matcher and the time we lock the repo and modify the dirstate. For example, the working copy might have been updated away, or purged, and the matched files would no longer be correct.
Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:26:13 +0100 locking: take the `wlock` for the full `hg forget` duration
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:26:13 +0100] rev 50006
locking: take the `wlock` for the full `hg forget` duration Otherwise, there is a race condition window between the time we resolve the file to forget with the matcher and the time we lock the repo and modify the dirstate. For example, the working copy might have been updated away, or purged, and the matched files would no longer be correct.
Tue, 13 Dec 2022 04:22:46 +0100 locking: take the `wlock` for the full `hg remove` duration
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 13 Dec 2022 04:22:46 +0100] rev 50005
locking: take the `wlock` for the full `hg remove` duration Otherwise, there is a race condition window between the time we resolve the file to remove with the matcher and the time we lock the repo and modify the dirstate. For example, the working copy might have been updated away, or purged, and the matched files would no longer be correct.
Tue, 13 Dec 2022 04:21:27 +0100 locking: take the `wlock` for the full `hg add` duration
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 13 Dec 2022 04:21:27 +0100] rev 50004
locking: take the `wlock` for the full `hg add` duration Otherwise, there is a race condition window between the time we resolve the file to add with the matcher and the time we lock the repo and modify the dirstate. For example, the working copy might have been updated away, or purged, and the matched files would no longer be correct.
Mon, 06 Feb 2023 01:22:01 +0100 dirstate: drop some very fishy looking piece of code
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 06 Feb 2023 01:22:01 +0100] rev 50003
dirstate: drop some very fishy looking piece of code This piece of code is marking the **real** dirstate file as a temporary transaction file. This means it get deleted on transaction rollback. This this quite wrong, especially as the comment points out some `dirstate.pending` motivation and the `.pending` file should already be fully managed by the transaction. The only ready I can think of this behavior not having awful results right now is because other transaction logic restore backed up content above the one that got wrongfully deleted. Let us stop doing this anyway, All tests seems happy.
Tue, 14 Feb 2023 23:05:18 +0100 dirstate: do not write an empty dirstate just for backup
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 14 Feb 2023 23:05:18 +0100] rev 50002
dirstate: do not write an empty dirstate just for backup This will get in the way when we get more strict about holding the lock when writing the dirstate. Instead, we simply don't copy dirstate files around if there are None at backup time. A couple of tests are impacted they no longer need to backup such "empty" dirstate.
Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:46:26 +0100 dirstate: pre-indent some of the backup code
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:46:26 +0100] rev 50001
dirstate: pre-indent some of the backup code This will make the next changeset clearer.
Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:27:24 +0100 debugrebuilddirstate: double check that no transaction is open
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:27:24 +0100] rev 50000
debugrebuilddirstate: double check that no transaction is open Since transaction impact dirstate write, we make sure nobody is trying anything strange with this internal command.
Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:26:23 +0100 dirstate: explicitly write the dirstate after `debugrebuilddirstate`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:26:23 +0100] rev 49999
dirstate: explicitly write the dirstate after `debugrebuilddirstate` I am working on making the dirstate write patterns more predictable. This patch is part of a small series of similar patches that adds a explicit dirstate write in a handful of location where the dirstate is updated "a bit in a strange way". With this explicit write, we are no longer relying on implicite write of the dirstate on `wlock` release. This make the world a better place.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -50 -30 +30 +50 +100 +300 +1000 tip