Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:15:21 +0200] rev 39917
rebase: expand a long "one-liner"
When a one-liner gets 3 lines longs, it lose its expressivity benefits. We
expand it into a simple for loop. This makes future changes of the code in
that area clearer.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:28:21 +0200] rev 39916
cleanupnodes: drop special casing around prune markers (API)
The `cleanupnodes` has logic to skip the creation of "prune" markers if the
changeset is already obsolete. This feels strange and gets in the way of code
changes to tracks folds. Now that callers no longer request such prune, we can
drop this logic.
In many cases, pruning through cleanupnodes should be replaced by internal
phase usage.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 22:05:28 +0200] rev 39915
rebase: don't try to prune obsolete changeset already in the destination
With similar motivations to the previous changesets, we stop marking changeset
from pruning when it is not the command intention. In this case, we still need
to distinguish between the strip and the obsolete case.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:51:29 +0200] rev 39914
histedit: don't cleanup nodes already disposed of
If something else took care of these temporary nodes, we don't need to do
anything about it. This less liberal usage of pruning through cleanup nodes
will help us further cleanup on the road to explicitly tracks folds.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 30 Sep 2018 01:15:46 -0400] rev 39913
py3: avoid b'' output in test-hgweb-non-interactive.t
I couldn't figure out how to get the list to print without b'' with
pycompat.write(), without converted each element to str.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 30 Sep 2018 01:10:41 -0400] rev 39912
py3: convert print to a function call in a few tests
I *think* this is the last of them.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 29 Sep 2018 23:52:00 -0400] rev 39911
py3: use util.forcebytestr() to convert push lock error to bytes
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:57:49 -0400] rev 39910
py3: byteify windows.shelltocmdexe()
This makes test-doctest.py happy on Windows.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:33:52 -0400] rev 39909
run-tests: flush output stream before prompting to accept changes
With py3 on Windows, the prompt to accept changes in an --interactive run wasn't
showing up until after the choice was read from stdin.
Pulkit Goyal <pulkit@yandex-team.ru> [Sun, 30 Sep 2018 05:52:42 +0530] rev 39908
py3: use util.forcebytestr() to convert error messages to bytes
This makes the python 3 buildbot green again.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4811
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 27 Sep 2018 14:26:02 -0700] rev 39907
context: stop catching TypeError when converting hex nodeid to binary
It has been a programming error to pass a 40-character string that is
not a hex nodeid since
8b86acc7aa64 (context: drop support for looking
up context by ambiguous changeid (API), 2018-04-28), so we can just
let it raise a TypeError.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4807
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 27 Sep 2018 09:56:13 -0700] rev 39906
context: stop catching and re-raising FilteredRepoLookupError
FilteredRepoLookupError is only raised by changectx's constructor and
the higher-level scmutil.revsymbol(), so there's no need to catch it
in changectx's constructor.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4806
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:18:45 -0400] rev 39905
util: use a context manager in readlock()
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Tue, 25 Sep 2018 21:16:12 -0400] rev 39904
py3: convert os.readlink() path to native strings on Windows
Windows insisted that it needs to be str. I skipped the stuff in the posix
module, and left `tests/f` and `run-tests.py` alone for now.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 29 Sep 2018 02:02:35 -0400] rev 39903
py3: suppress the output from .write() calls in the remaining tests
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Fri, 28 Sep 2018 23:17:06 -0400] rev 39902
py3: conditionalize json float precision difference in test-debugcommands.t
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:39:18 -0400] rev 39901
py3: byteify extension in test-debugcommands.t
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:55:06 +0200] rev 39900
pullreport: rev duplicated and extinct into account
If we already have some obsolete and hidden nodes locally and the server send
them again to you, it seems useful to point it out instead of being silent about
it.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:52:25 +0200] rev 39899
pullreport: issue a message about "extinct" pulled changesets
Changeset pulled from a remote repository while already obsolete locally can
end up hidden after the pull. Hiding obsolete changesets is a good behavior
but silently "skipping" some of the pulled content can get confusing.
We now detect this situation and emit a message about it. The message is
simple and the wording could be improved, however, we focus on the detection
here. Evolution is still an experimental feature, so the output is open to
changes.
In particular, we could point out at the latest successors of the obsolete
changesets, however, it can get tricky is there are many of them. So we delay
these improvements to another adventure.
Another easy improvement would be to merge this message with the previous line
about the new nodes and their phases.
This is a good example of cases where we can only transmit a limited amount of
data to users by default. We need some sort of "transaction journal" we could
point the user to.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:00:00 +0200] rev 39898
pullreport: skip or rework some early return
We are about to add more logic in this report. Before that, we need it to not
quit so early.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:35:10 +0200] rev 39897
pullreport: skip filtered revs instead of obsolete ones
Obsolescence is closely related to visibility but still a distinct concept. We
can receive changesets that are obsolete but visible (eg: when pulling
orphans). Such changeset should be reported too. In addition, the filtering
level can be anything, we should respect it.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 27 Sep 2018 18:06:13 +0200] rev 39896
pullreport: add a test to show misreporting of visible changeset
The current code ignores all obsolete changesets including the visible one. We
add a test showing this behavior before fixing the behavior.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:38:37 -0700] rev 39895
repo: don't look up context for tip node if it's not needed
We were doing repo['tip'].node() or similar in a few places where
repo.changelog.tip() would be enough.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4781
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 22:17:34 -0700] rev 39894
repo: look up nullrev context by revnum, not symbolic name
I think lookup of the 'null' symbol should be done via
scmutil.revsymbol() and repo['null'] is only supported for historical
reasons. However, repo[nullrev] is fine, so we can switch to that
instead of switching to scmutil.revsymbol('null').
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4780
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 22:17:26 -0700] rev 39893
bundle: consistently put revnums in "base" collection
The "base" collection contains revnums, except that it can also
contain the "null" symbol. That's a little weird. Let's be consistent.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4779
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 27 Sep 2018 22:07:12 -0400] rev 39892
py3: ensure printing to stdout uses str in test-hgweb-no-request-uri.t
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 27 Sep 2018 13:57:50 -0700] rev 39891
scmutil: accept multiple predecessors in 'replacements' (API)
This changeset makes 'cleanupnodes' accepts multiple predecessors as
`replacements` keys. The same as it accepts multiple successors as
`replacements` values. To avoid breaking all callers, the old and new ways are
currently valid at the same time. We'll deprecate and drop the old way later.
This change is the first step toward a better tracking of "fold" event in the
evolution history. While working on the "rewind" command (in the evolve
extension), we realized that first class tracking of folds are necessary.
We already have good tracking of splits. When walking the evolution history
from predecessors to successors, that makes for a clear distinction between
having multiple successors because of the actual splitting of a changeset or
content-divergences.
The "rewind" command allows restoring older evolution of a stack of
changesets. One of its mode walks the evolution history to automatically find
appropriate predecessors. This means walking from successors to predecessors.
In this case, we need to be able to make the same distinction between an
actual fold and other cases. So we will have to track folds explicitly.
This changesets only focus on making it possible to express fold at the
`cleanupnodes` API level. The actual tracking will be implemented later.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 27 Sep 2018 13:54:37 -0700] rev 39890
scmutil: expand long "one-liner"
When a one-liner gets 3 lines longs, it loses its expressivity benefits. We
expand it into a simple for loop. This makes future changes of the code in
that area clearer.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:47:05 +0200] rev 39889
shelve: find shelvedctx from bundle even if they are already in the repo
We use the new "duplicates" node tracking to find the tip of the bundle even if
it already exists in the repository.
Such logic is not supposed to be needed in theory. If the shelve was made using
internal-phase, we already know its node. Otherwise, the bundle content should
have been stripped. However, handling it makes the shelve code more robust and
provide a good example of "revduplicates" usage.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:19:28 +0200] rev 39888
shelve: return the shelved node as part of bundle application
It make sense to have the function in charge of unbundling the shelved revision
also return the node of that revision (when the data is in the bundle).
This will help us to handle unnatural state where the unshelved change already
exists in the repository.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:18:28 +0200] rev 39887
changelog: keep track of duplicated node in the transaction adding them
The transaction is already tracking the new nodes. We now tracks the
"duplicates" in the same location.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Wed, 19 Sep 2018 21:02:47 +0200] rev 39886
revlog: add a callback "tracking" duplicate node addition
If a changegroup contains node already added to the repository, they will be
skipped. Skipping them is the right behavior (we don't need to store things
twice), but it can hide some information to the code doing the unbundle (eg:
shelve looking for the tip of the bundle).
The first step to improve this situation is to add a low level callback. We do
not need this tracking on all revlog, so actual tracking will be added in the
next changeset.
Valentin Gatien-Baron <vgatien-baron@janestreet.com> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 18:30:19 -0400] rev 39885
logtoprocess: define $HG for children processes
So they can compute the hg version for instance.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4768
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 22:21:25 -0400] rev 39884
py3: mask out None type when printing in `debuglocks`
Apparently, %b doesn't allow None.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:25:18 -0400] rev 39883
py3: ensure standard exceptions use `str` type strings in windows.py
See also
edaa40dc5fe5.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 20:49:28 -0400] rev 39882
py3: replace a StandardError reference
This doesn't exist on py3, and the standard way of handling this seems to be to
catch both exceptions.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 15:19:52 -0700] rev 39881
storageutil: extract revision number iteration
This code is a bit quirky (and possibly buggy). It will likely be used
by multiple storage backends. Let's extract it so it is reusable.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4757
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 14:54:28 -0700] rev 39880
storageutil: new function for extracting metadata-less content from text
Other storage backends will want to do this.
I'm not concerned about Python function call overhead because I
expect self.revision() to dwarf the function call overhead time,
since self.revision() requires multiple function calls and may
involve decompression in the common case.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4756
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 14:33:45 -0700] rev 39879
storageutil: move _censoredtext() from revlog
This seems like generic functionality we'll want to use from
non-revlog storage backends.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4755
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 14:31:31 -0700] rev 39878
storageutil: move metadata parsing and packing from revlog (API)
Parsing and writing of revision text metadata is likely identical
across storage backends. Let's move the code out of revlog so we
don't need to import the revlog module in order to use it.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4754
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 14:23:54 -0700] rev 39877
storageutil: new module for storage primitives (API)
There will exist common code between storage backends. It would
be nice to have a central place to put that code.
This commit attempts to create that place by creating the
"storageutil" module.
The first thing we move is revlog.hash(), which is the function for
computing the SHA-1 hash of revision fulltext and parents.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4753
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:35:50 -0700] rev 39876
filelog: stop proxying deltaparent() (API)
deltaparent() obtains the revision number of the base revision a
delta in storage is stored against. It is highly revlog-centric and
may not apply to other storage backends. As a result, it doesn't
belong on the generic file storage interface.
This method/proxy is no longer used in core. The last consumer was
probably changegroup code and went away with the transition to
emitrevisions().
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4751
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:49:17 -0700] rev 39875
filelog: stop proxying rawsize() (API)
This method is no longer used by external consumers. The API is
quite low-level and is effectively len(revision(raw=True)). I don't
see a compelling reason to keep it around.
Let's drop the API and make the file storage interface simpler.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4750
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:42:03 -0700] rev 39874
filelog: stop proxying "opener" (API)
The last consumer of it in upgrade code was removed as part of the
previous commit. This attribute is revlog specific (because it
assumes the existence of a vfs for performing I/O on tracked file
data) and therefore isn't appropriate for a generic storage interface.
So nuke it.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4749
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 11:16:33 -0700] rev 39873
filelog: stop proxying flags() (API)
Per-revision storage flags are kinda a revlog-centric API. (Except for
the fact that changegroup uses the same integer flags as revlog does
and there's minimal verification that the server's flags map to the
client's storage flags - but that's another problem.)
The last user of flags() was in verify.py and that code was just moved
into revlog.py and is accessed behind the verifyintegrity() file
storage API.
Since there are no more consumers, let's drop the proxy and remove
the method from the file storage interface.
This commit only drops the dedicated API for reading a single
revision's storage flags: we still support reading and writing flags
through the bulk data retrieval and add revision APIs. And since
changegroups encode revlog integer flags over the wire, we'll always
need to support flags at some level. The removal of individual storage
flags may be too premature. But since flags() is now unused, I'd like
to see how far we can get without that dedicated API - especially
since it uses revision numbers instead of nodes.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4746
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 11:27:47 -0700] rev 39872
revlog: move revision verification out of verify
File revision verification is performing low-level checks of file
storage, namely that flags are appropriate and revision data can
be resolved.
Since these checks are somewhat revlog-specific and may not
be appropriate for alternate storage backends, this commit moves
those checks from verify.py to revlog.py.
Because we're now emitting warnings/errors that apply to specific
revisions, we taught the iverifyproblem interface to expose the
problematic node and to report this node in verify output. This
was necessary to prevent unwanted test changes.
After this change, revlog.verifyintegrity() and file verify code
in verify.py both iterate over revisions and resolve their fulltext.
But they do so in separate loops. (verify.py needs to resolve
fulltexts as part of calling renamed() - at least when using revlogs.)
This should add overhead.
But on the mozilla-unified repo:
$ hg verify
before: time: real 700.640 secs (user 585.520+0.000 sys 23.480+0.000)
after: time: real 682.380 secs (user 570.370+0.000 sys 22.240+0.000)
I'm not sure what's going on. Maybe avoiding the filelog attribute
proxies shaved off enough time to offset the losses? Maybe fulltext
resolution has less overhead than I thought?
I've left a comment indicating the potential for optimization. But
because it doesn't produce a performance regression on a large
repository, I'm not going to worry about it.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4745
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:06:44 -0700] rev 39871
tests: de-flake test-narrow-debugrebuilddirstate.t
If the dirstate gets written much later (usually 1-2 s, depending on
FS) than the working copy file (there's only one), then the `hg
debugdirstate` command will include a timestamp. There's nothing wrong
with that, so we should just allow it.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4758
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:39:34 -0700] rev 39870
upgrade: use storageinfo() for obtaining storage metadata
Let's switch to our new API for obtaining information about storage.
This eliminates the last consumer of rawsize() and the opener proxy
from the file storage interface!
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4748
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 11:56:48 -0700] rev 39869
revlog: add method for obtaining storage info (API)
We currently have a handful of methods on the file and manifest
storage interfaces for obtaining metadata about storage. e.g.
files() is used to obtain the files backing storage. rawsize()
is to quickly compute the size of tracked revisions without resolving
their fulltext.
Code in upgrade and stream clone make heavy use of these methods.
The existing APIs are generic and don't necessarily have the
specialization that we need going forward. For example, files()
doesn't distinguish between exclusive storage and shared storage.
This makes stream clone difficult to implement when e.g. there may
be a single file backing storage for multiple tracked paths. It
also makes reporting difficult, as we don't know how many bytes are
actually used by storage since we can't easily identify shared files.
This commit implements a new method for obtaining storage metadata.
It is designed to accept arguments specifying what metadata to request
and to return a dict with those fields populated. We /could/ make
each of these attributes a separate method. But this is a specialized
API and I'm trying to avoid method bloat on the interfaces. There is
also the possibility that certain callers will want to obtain multiple
fields in different combinations and some backends may have performance
issues obtaining all that data via separate method calls.
Simple storage integration tests have been added. For now, we assume
fields can't be "None" (ignoring the interface documentation). We can
revisit this later.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4747
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 11:27:41 -0700] rev 39868
lfs: drop unused import
A recent change dropped the last user of this module.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4744
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:08:58 -0700] rev 39867
filelog: drop _generaldelta attribute (API)
With changegroup moving to emitrevisions(), this revlog-specific
attribute is no longer used and can be deleted. Good riddance.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4727
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:59:19 -0700] rev 39866
revlog: drop emitrevisiondeltas() and associated functionality (API)
emitrevisions() is the future!
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4726
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:47:04 -0700] rev 39865
changegroup: port to emitrevisions() (
issue5976)
We now have a unified API for emitting revision data from a storage
backend. It handles sorting nodes and the complicated delta versus
revision decisions for us.
This commit ports changegroup to that API.
There should be no behavior changes for changegroups not using
ellipsis. And lack of test changes seems to confirm that.
There are some changes for ellipsis mode, however.
Before, when sending an ellipsis revision, we would always send a
fulltext revision (as opposed to a delta). There was a TODO tracking
this open item.
One of the things the emitrevisions() API does for us is figure out
whether we can safely emit a delta. So, it is now possible for
ellipsis revisions to be sent as deltas! (It does this by not
assuming parent/ancestor revisions are available and tracking which
revisions have been sent out.)
Because we eliminated the list of revision delta request objects,
performance has improved substantially:
$ hg perfchangegroupchangelog
before: ! wall 24.348077 comb 24.330000 user 24.140000 sys 0.190000 (best of 3)
after: ! wall 18.245911 comb 18.240000 user 18.100000 sys 0.140000 (best of 3)
That's a lot of overhead for creating a few hundred thousand Python
objects!
This is still a little slower than 4.7. Probably due to
23d582ca
introducing a type for the revision/delta results. There is
potentially room to optimize. But at some point we need to abstract
storage in order to support alternate storage backends. Unfortunately
that means using a Python data structure to represent results. And
unfortunately there is overhead with every new Python object created.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4725
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:48:02 -0700] rev 39864
wireprotov2server: port to emitrevisions()
We now have a proper storage API to request data on multiple
revisions. We can drop it into wire protocol version 2 with
minimal effort.
The new API handles pretty much everything we were doing manually to
build up the delta request. So we were able to delete a lot of code.
As a bonus, wireprotov2 code is no longer accessing some low-level
storage APIs. This includes the assumption that a node has an
associated numeric revision number! This should make it drastically
simpler to implement a server that doesn't have the concept of
revision numbers.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4724
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:54:59 -0700] rev 39863
tests: use more complex file storage test
The previous test was attempting to to test delta storage behavior.
It didn't do a very good job at it because there was a good chance
a delta wasn't being used in storage.
Let's switch the test to yield a delta in storage so an upcoming
change to delegate delta logic to storage has the desired effect.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4723
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:28:21 -0700] rev 39862
revlog: new API to emit revision data
I recently refactored changegroup generation code to make it more
storage agnostic. I made significant progress. But there is still
a bit of work to be done. Specifically:
* Changegroup code is looking at low-level storage attributes to
influence sorting. Sorting should be done at the storage layer.
* The linknode lookup and sorting code for ellipsis is very
complicated.
* Linknodes are just generally wonky because e.g. file storage doesn't
know how to translate a linkrev to a changelog node.
* We regressed performance when introducing the request-response
objects.
Having thought about this problem a bit, I think I've come up with
a better interface for emitting revision deltas.
This commit defines and implements that interface. See the docstring
in repository.py for more info.
This API adds 3 notable features over the previous one.
First, it defers node ordering to the storage implementation in
the common case but allows overriding as necessary. We have a
facility for requesting an exact ordering (used in ellipsis
mode). We have another facility for storage order (used for changelog).
Second, we have an argument specifying assumptions about parents
revisions. This can be used to force a fulltext revision when we
don't know the receiver has a parent revision to delta against.
Third, we can control whether revision data is emitted. This makes
the API suitable as a generic "index data retrieval" API as well
as for producing revision deltas - possibly in the same operation!
The new API is much simpler: we no longer need a complicated "request"
object to encapsulate the delta generation request. I'm optimistic
this will restore performance loss associated with
emitrevisiondeltas().
Storage unit tests for the new API have been implemented.
Future commits will port existing consumers of emitrevisiondeltas()
to the new API then remove emitrevisiondeltas().
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4722
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:41:42 -0700] rev 39861
changegroup: remove reordering control (BC)
This logic - including the experimental bundle.reorder option -
was originally added in
a8e3931e3fb5 in 2011 and then later ported
to changegroup.py.
The intent of this option and associated logic is to control
the ordering of revisions in deltagroups in changegroups. At the
time it was implemented, only changegroup version 1 existed
and generaldelta revlogs were just coming into the world. Changegroup
version 1 requires that deltas be made against the last revision
sent over the wire. Used with generaldelta, this created an
impedance mismatch of sorts and resulted in changegroup producers
spending a lot of time recomputing deltas.
Revision reordering was introduced so outgoing revisions would be
sent in "generaldelta order" and producers would be able to
reuse internal deltas from storage.
Later on, we introduced changegroup version 2. It supported denoting
which revision a delta was against. So we no longer needed to
sort outgoing revisions to ensure optimal delta generation from the
producer. So, subsequent changegroup versions disabled reordering.
We also later made the changelog not store deltas by default. And
we also made the changelog send out deltas in storage order. Why we
do this for changelog, I'm not sure. Maybe we want to preserve revision
order across clones? It doesn't really matter for this commit.
Fast forward to 2018. We want to abstract storage backends. And having
changegroup code require knowledge about how deltas are stored
internally interferes with that goal.
This commit removes reordering control from changegroup generation.
After this commit, the reordering behavior is:
* The changelog is always sent out in storage order (no behavior
change).
* Non-changelog generaldelta revlogs are reordered to always be in DAG
topological order (previously, generaldelta revlogs would be emitted
in storage order for version 2 and 3 changegroups).
* Non-changelog non-generaldelta revlogs are sent in storage order (no
behavior change).
* There exists no config option to override behavior.
The big difference here is that generaldelta revlogs now *always* have
their revisions sorted in DAG order before going out over the wire. This
behavior was previously only done for changegroup version 1. Version 2
and version 3 changegroups disabled reordering because the interchange
format supported encoding arbitrary delta parents, so reordering wasn't
strictly necessary.
I can think of a few significant implications for this change.
Because changegroup receivers will now see non-changelog revisions
in DAG order instead of storage order, the internal storage order of
manifests and files may differ substantially between producer and
consumer. I don't think this matters that much, since the storage
order of manifests and files is largely hidden from users. Only
the storage order of changelog matters (because `hg log` shows the
changelog in storage order). I don't think there should be any
controversy here.
The reordering of revisions has implications for changegroup producers.
Previously, generaldelta revlogs would be emitted in storage order.
And in the common case, the internally-stored delta could effectively
be copied from disk into the deltagroup delta. This meant that emitting
delta groups for generaldelta revlogs would be mostly linear read I/O.
This is desirable for performance. With us now reordering generaldelta
revlog revisions in DAG order, the read operations may use more random
I/O instead of sequential I/O. This could result in performance
loss. But with the prevalence of SSDs and fast random I/O, I'm not
too worried. (Note: the optimal emission order for revlogs is actually
delta encoding order. But the changegroup code wasn't doing that before
or after this change. We could potentially implement that in a later
commit.)
Changegroups in DAG order will have implications for receivers.
Previously, receiving storage order might mean seeing a number of
interleaved branches. This would mean long delta chains, sparse
I/O, and possibly more fulltext revisions instead of deltas, blowing
up storage storage. (This is the same set of problems that sparse
revlogs aims to address.) With the producer now sending revisions in DAG
order, the receiver also stores revisions in DAG order. That means
revisions for the same DAG branch are all grouped together. And this
should yield better storage outcomes. In other words, sending the
reordered changegroup allows the receiver to have better storage
order and for the producer to not propagate its (possibly sub-optimal)
internal storage order.
On the mozilla-unified repository, this change influences bundle
generation:
$ hg bundle -t none-v2 -a
before: time: real 355.680 secs (user 256.790+0.000 sys 16.820+0.000)
after: time: real 382.950 secs (user 281.700+0.000 sys 17.690+0.000)
before: 7,150,228,967 bytes (uncompressed)
after: 7,041,556,273 bytes (uncompressed)
before: 1,669,063,234 bytes (zstd l=3)
after: 1,628,598,830 bytes (zstd l=3)
$ hg unbundle
before: time: real 511.910 secs (user 466.750+0.000 sys 32.680+0.000)
after: time: real 487.790 secs (user 443.940+0.000 sys 30.840+0.000)
00manifest.d size:
source: 274,924,292 bytes
before: 304,741,626 bytes
after: 245,252,087 bytes
.hg/store total file size:
source: 2,649,133,490
before: 2,680,888,130
after: 2,627,875,673
We see the bundle size drop. That's probably because if a revlog
internally isn't storing a delta, it will choose to delta against
the last emitted revision. And on repos with interleaved branches
(like mozilla-unified), the previous revision could be an unrelated
branch and therefore be a large delta. But with this patch, the
previous revision is likely p1 or p2 and a delta should be small.
We also see the manifest size drop by ~50 MB. It's worth noting that
the manifest actually *increased* in size by ~25 MB in the old
strategy and decreased ~25 MB from its source in the new strategy.
Again, my explanation for this is that the DAG ordering in the
changegroup is resulting in better grouping of revisions in the
receiver, which results in more compact delta chains and higher
storage efficiency.
Unbundle time also dropped. I suspect this is due to the revlog having
to work less to compute deltas since the incoming deltas are more
optimal. i.e. the receiver spends less time resolving fulltext
revisions as incoming deltas bounce around between DAG branches and
delta chains.
We also see bundle generation time increase. This is not desirable.
However, the regression is only significant on the original repository:
if we generate a bundle from the repository created from the new,
always reordered bundles, we're close to baseline (if not at it with
expected noise):
$ hg bundle -t none-v2 -a
before (original): time: real 355.680 secs (user 256.790+0.000 sys 16.820+0.000)
after (original): time: real 382.950 secs (user 281.700+0.000 sys 17.690+0.000)
after (new repo): time: real 362.280 secs (user 260.300+0.000 sys 17.700+0.000)
This regression is a bit worrying because it will impact serving
canonical repositories (that don't have optimal internal storage
unless they are reordered - possibly as part of running
`hg debugupgraderepo`). However, this regression will only be
noticed by very large changegroups. And I'm guessing/hoping that
any repository that large is using clonebundles to mitigate server
load.
Again, sending DAG order isn't the optimal send order for servers:
sending in storage-delta order is. But in order to enable
storage-optimal send order, we'll need a storage API that handles
sorting. Future commits will introduce such an API.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4721
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Thu, 20 Sep 2018 19:31:07 -0700] rev 39860
filelog: drop index attribute (API)
The previous commit removed the last consumer of the "index" attribute
on the file storage interface. The index is an extremely low-level
data structure that is revlog specific and isn't appropriate to
expose as part of a generic storage API. There may be a market for
an efficient data structure to obtain metadata on every revision for
a file. But if there is, it should be designed using e.g. named
attributes for lookup instead of a list-like of 8-tuples.
Let's drop the attribute from filelog and remove the attribute from
the file storage interface.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4720
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:38:27 -0700] rev 39859
upgrade: use rawsize() instead of revlog index
The revlog index is a very low-level data structure and it shouldn't
be exposed to the storage interface - at least not in its current
form.
upgrade.py is the only consumer of the index attribute on file storage
in the repository.
This commit rewrites that final consumer to use rawsize() instead of
going through the index. This is actually the more proper API to use,
as rawsize() will accurately report the size of revisions which have
a negative size in the index.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4719
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Thu, 20 Sep 2018 19:20:01 -0700] rev 39858
manifest: add rawsize() proxy (API)
I'm not keen about doing this. But it unblocks efforts to remove
"index" from the file storage interface. We will probably remove this
once we have a better upgrade API in place.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4718