changegroup: add a "packermap" dictionary to track different packer versions
We only have "01" right now, but we should get general delta in soon.
Bundle2 is expected to make use of this to advertise and select the right packer
to use on both sides.
templater: don't overwrite the keyword mapping in runsymbol() (
issue4362)
This keyword remapping was introduced in
e06e9fd2d99f as part of converting
generator based iterators into list based iterators, mentioning "undesired
behavior in template" when a generator is exhausted, but doesn't say what and
introduces no tests.
The problem with the remapping was that it corrupted the output for keywords
like 'extras', 'file_copies' and 'file_copies_switch' in templates such as:
$ hg log -r
142b5d5ec9cc --template "{file_copies % ' File: {file_copy}\n'}"
File: mercurial/changelog.py (mercurial/hg.py)
File: mercurial/changelog.py (mercurial/hg.py)
File: mercurial/changelog.py (mercurial/hg.py)
File: mercurial/changelog.py (mercurial/hg.py)
File: mercurial/changelog.py (mercurial/hg.py)
File: mercurial/changelog.py (mercurial/hg.py)
File: mercurial/changelog.py (mercurial/hg.py)
File: mercurial/changelog.py (mercurial/hg.py)
What was happening was that in the first call to runtemplate() inside runmap(),
'lm' mapped the keyword (e.g. file_copies) to the appropriate showxxx() method.
On each subsequent call to runtemplate() in that loop however, the keyword was
mapped to a list of the first item's pieces, e.g.:
'file_copy': ['mercurial/changelog.py', ' (', 'mercurial/hg.py', ')']
Therefore, the dict for the second and any subsequent items were not processed
through the corresponding showxxx() method, and the first item's data was
reused.
The 'extras' keyword regressed in
de7e6c489412, and 'file_copies' regressed in
0b241d7a8c62 for other reasons. The common thread of things fixed by this seems
to be when a list of dicts are passed to the templatekw._hybrid class.
revset-matching: call 'getset' on a 'fullreposet'
Calling 'baseset(repo.changelog)' builds a list for all revisions in
the repo. And we already have the lazy and efficient 'fullreposet'
class for this purpose.
This gives us the usual benefits of the fullreposet but it is less visible
because the matching process itself is very expensive:
revset) matching(100)
before) wall 6.413281 comb 6.420000 user 5.910000 sys 0.510000 (best of 3)
after) wall 6.173608 comb 6.170000 user 5.750000 sys 0.420000 (best of 3)
However for some complex list, this provide a massive speedup
revset) matching(parents(100))
before) wall 23.890740 comb 23.890000 user 23.450000 sys 0.440000 (best of 3)
after) wall 6.382280 comb 6.390000 user 5.930000 sys 0.460000 (best of 3)
revset-parentspec: call 'getset' on a 'fullreposet'
Calling 'baseset(repo.changelog)' builds a list for all revisions in
the repo. And we already have the lazy and efficient 'fullreposet'
class for this purpose.
This gives us the usual benefits of the fullreposet:
revset) 100^1
before) wall 0.002694 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 897)
after) wall 0.000997 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 2324)
revset) parents(100)^1
before) wall 0.003832 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 587)
after) wall 0.001034 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 2309)
revset) (100^1)^1
before) wall 0.005616 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 405)
after) wall 0.001030 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 2258)
revset-children: call 'getset' on a 'fullreposet'
Calling 'baseset(repo.changelog)' builds a list for all revisions in the
repo. And we already have the lazy and efficient 'fullreposet' class
for this purpose.
This gives us the usual benefits of the fullreposet:
revset) children(tip~100)
before) wall 0.007469 comb 0.010000 user 0.010000 sys 0.000000 (best of 338)
after) wall 0.003356 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 755)
revset-ancestorspec: call 'getset' on a 'fullreposet'
Calling 'baseset(repo.changelog)' builds a list for all revisions in
the repo. And we already have the lazy and efficient 'fullreposet'
class for this purpose.
This gives us the usual benefits of the fullreposet:
revset) 100~5
before) wall 0.002712 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 918)
after) wall 0.000996 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 2493)
revset) parents(100)~5
before) wall 0.003812 comb 0.010000 user 0.010000 sys 0.000000 (best of 667)
after) wall 0.001038 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 2361)
revset) (100~5)~5
before) wall 0.005614 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 446)
after) wall 0.001035 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 2424)
revset-rangeset: call 'getset' on a 'fullreposet'
Calling 'baseset(repo.changelog)' builds a list for all revisions in
the repo. And we already have the lazy and efficient 'fullreposet'
class for this purpose.
This gives us the usual benefit ofs the fullreposet:
revset) 10:100
before) wall 0.002774 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 797)
after) wall 0.001977 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 1244)
revset) parents(10):parents(100)
before) wall 0.005054 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 481)
after) wall 0.002060 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 1056)