Sat, 04 Apr 2015 02:16:48 -0700 histedit: delete all non-actionclass related code
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Sat, 04 Apr 2015 02:16:48 -0700] rev 24774
histedit: delete all non-actionclass related code Now that all actions have been migrated to the class format, we can delete all the unnecessary code that supported the old function format.
Sat, 04 Apr 2015 02:12:53 -0700 histedit: improve roll action integration with fold
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Sat, 04 Apr 2015 02:12:53 -0700] rev 24773
histedit: improve roll action integration with fold Previously the fold action would inspect it's class to figure out if it was a rollup or not. This was hacky. Now that finishfold is inside the fold class, let's modify it to check a function (which roll can override) to determine if it should be prompting for a commit message.
Sat, 04 Apr 2015 02:12:24 -0700 histedit: move finishfold into fold class
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Sat, 04 Apr 2015 02:12:24 -0700] rev 24772
histedit: move finishfold into fold class Let's move the finishfold function into the fold class so we can modify it from the roll class more easily.
Sat, 04 Apr 2015 02:03:27 -0700 histedit: convert fold/roll actions into a class
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Sat, 04 Apr 2015 02:03:27 -0700] rev 24771
histedit: convert fold/roll actions into a class This converts the fold/roll actions into a histeditclass instance, as part of an ongoing effort to refactor histedit for maintainability and robustness. The tests changed for two reasons: 1) We get a new 'empty changeset' warning because we now warn more consistently between normal histedit and --continue about commits disappearing. 2) Previously we were not putting the histedit-source extra field on the temporary fold commit during normal runs, but we were on --continue runs. By unifying these code paths we now consistently put histedit-source on the temporary fold commit, which changes some of the hashes in the backup bundles.
Sat, 04 Apr 2015 01:00:51 -0700 histedit: convert edit action into a class
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Sat, 04 Apr 2015 01:00:51 -0700] rev 24770
histedit: convert edit action into a class This converts the edit action into a histeditclass instance, as part of an ongoing effort to refactor histedit for maintainability and robustness.
Sat, 04 Apr 2015 00:42:32 -0700 histedit: convert message action into a class
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Sat, 04 Apr 2015 00:42:32 -0700] rev 24769
histedit: convert message action into a class This converts the message action into a histeditclass instance, as part of an ongoing effort to refactor histedit for maintainability and robustness.
Sat, 04 Apr 2015 00:30:01 -0700 histedit: convert drop action into a class
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Sat, 04 Apr 2015 00:30:01 -0700] rev 24768
histedit: convert drop action into a class This converts the drop action into a histeditclass instance, as part of an ongoing effort to refactor histedit for maintainability and robustness.
Sat, 04 Apr 2015 11:39:08 -0700 histedit: convert pick action into a class
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Sat, 04 Apr 2015 11:39:08 -0700] rev 24767
histedit: convert pick action into a class This converts the pick action into a histeditclass instance, as part of an ongoing effort to refactor histedit for maintainability and robustness. The test output changed because previously pick would only report the commit disappearing if there were no merge conflicts. Now that we've unified the normal and the --continue flows, they act the same and we get the warning even after --continue.
Sat, 04 Apr 2015 11:37:08 -0700 histedit: integrate action class into flow
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Sat, 04 Apr 2015 11:37:08 -0700] rev 24766
histedit: integrate action class into flow This takes the newly added histeditaction class and integrates it into the histedit run and bootstrapcontinue logic. No actions implement the class yet, but they will be add in upcoming patches.
Sat, 04 Apr 2015 11:34:53 -0700 histedit: add a new histeditaction class
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Sat, 04 Apr 2015 11:34:53 -0700] rev 24765
histedit: add a new histeditaction class This adds a new class called histeditaction. It represents a single action in a histedit plan. Future patches will integrate it into the histedit flow, then convert each existing action in to the class form one by one. This is part of a larger refactor aimed at increasing histedit robustness, maintainability, and extensibility.
Sat, 04 Apr 2015 01:00:05 -0700 histedit: allow histedit --continue when not on a descendant (BC)
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Sat, 04 Apr 2015 01:00:05 -0700] rev 24764
histedit: allow histedit --continue when not on a descendant (BC) Previously we would not allow --continue if the current working copy parent was not a descendant of the commit produced by the previous histedit step. There's nothing really blocking us from continuing the histedit in this situation, so let's stop aborting in this case. This is technically a BC change, but it is making things more forgiving so I think it's ok. In the future we will likely add an 'exec' action to histedit, which means the user can do whatever they want during the middle of a histedit (like perhaps calling 'hg update'), which means we'll need to support this case eventually anyway.
Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:59:36 -0400 tags: explicitly log which tags cache file is being written
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:59:36 -0400] rev 24763
tags: explicitly log which tags cache file is being written We now have multiple tags cache files. Record exactly which file is being written. This should help aid debugging into performance issues with any single filter.
Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:54:13 -0400 tags: write a separate tags cache file for unfiltered repos
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:54:13 -0400] rev 24762
tags: write a separate tags cache file for unfiltered repos Since we changed the format of the tags cache, we should bump the filename. Before this patch, "tags" was being used for unfiltered repositories. Change the naming scheme to be consistent and ensure that a new cache file is used. While I was here, I updated the docs to describe the existence of multiple caches. I also added explicit test coverage for the creation of the unfiltered tags cache.
Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:32:46 -0400 tags: return empty list of heads for no .hgtags case
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:32:46 -0400] rev 24761
tags: return empty list of heads for no .hgtags case The caller only uses the heads to resolve tags from content of .hgtags. Returning a non-empty array is pointless if there is no .hgtags file.
Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:01:00 -0400 tags: change format of tags cache files
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:01:00 -0400] rev 24760
tags: change format of tags cache files .hgtags fnodes are now written to a shared cache file. They don't need to exist in the per-filter tags cache files. Stop writing them. The format of the tags cache file has changed in a backwards incompatible way. This should be acceptable, as we just established per-filter tags cache files and no client should have per-filter tags cache files that will need to be read. So no backwards compatbility concern is present. The new format has a single header line followed by resolved tags entries. The header line is similar to the old first line with a major difference: we now compute and store a hash of the filtered revisions. Before, if the set of filtered revs changed, we may return incorrect results. We now detect that. A test for verifying filtered rev change is handled properly has been added.
Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:12:44 -0400 tags: don't read .hgtags fnodes from tags cache files
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:12:44 -0400] rev 24759
tags: don't read .hgtags fnodes from tags cache files Now that we have a standalone and shared cache for .hgtags fnodes, the .hgtags fnodes stored in the tags cache files are redundant. Upcoming patches will change the format of the tags cache files to remove this data and to improve the validation. To prepare for this, we change the tags reading code to ignore all but the tip .hgtags fnodes entries in existing tags cache files. All fnodes lookups now go through our new shared cache, which is why test output changed. Format of tags cache files has not yet changed.
Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:54:02 -0400 rebase: restore bookmark state on abort
Tony Tung <tonytung@fb.com> [Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:54:02 -0400] rev 24758
rebase: restore bookmark state on abort The bookmark state was already being preserved, but it wasn't being properly restored.
Sat, 04 Apr 2015 02:37:43 -0700 histedit: store backup file before histedit
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Sat, 04 Apr 2015 02:37:43 -0700] rev 24757
histedit: store backup file before histedit It's possible for the user to delete some of the commits they started with during a histedit, and aborting the histedit doesn't bring them back. Let's store a backup bundle so we can always recover the stack of commits from before they began.
Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:23:57 -0700 histedit: replace pickle with custom serialization
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:23:57 -0700] rev 24756
histedit: replace pickle with custom serialization Pickle is undesirable, so let's serialize it ourselves. We keep the ability to parse existing pickle blobs for now.
Wed, 15 Apr 2015 01:18:09 -0400 devel-warn: add a prefix to all messages ("devel-warn: ")
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 15 Apr 2015 01:18:09 -0400] rev 24755
devel-warn: add a prefix to all messages ("devel-warn: ") We want to make the origin and importance of the message clear to developers.
Wed, 15 Apr 2015 10:36:21 -0400 push: acquire local 'wlock' if "pushback" is expected (BC) (issue4596)
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 15 Apr 2015 10:36:21 -0400] rev 24754
push: acquire local 'wlock' if "pushback" is expected (BC) (issue4596) If the client allows "pushback", the bundle2 served back by the server may contains parts that will write to the repository. Such parts may require the 'wlock' (eg: bookmark) so we acquire it in advance to make sure it got acquired before the 'lock'.
Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:33:53 +0900 annotate: always prepare ancestry context of base fctx (issue4600) stable
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:33:53 +0900] rev 24753
annotate: always prepare ancestry context of base fctx (issue4600) This patch extends the workaround introduced by dd01834a696f. Even if the base fctx is the same as intorrev, _ancestrycontext must be built for faster _changeid lookup. repo: https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta command: hg annotate -r 4954faa47dd0 gfx/thebes/gfxWindowsPlatform.cpp before: 52.450 sec after: 1.820 sec
Wed, 15 Apr 2015 01:16:40 -0400 unbundle: acquire 'wlock' when processing bundle2 (BC) (issue4596)
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 15 Apr 2015 01:16:40 -0400] rev 24752
unbundle: acquire 'wlock' when processing bundle2 (BC) (issue4596) A bundle2 may contain bookmark updates (or other extension content) that requires the 'wlock' to be written. As 'wlock' must be acquired before 'lock', we must stay on the side of caution and use both in all case to ensure their ordering.
Sun, 12 Apr 2015 09:46:03 -0400 run-test: enable the devel warning during tests
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Sun, 12 Apr 2015 09:46:03 -0400] rev 24751
run-test: enable the devel warning during tests This should help us to catch new locking order issues as soon as possible. There are two harmless test updates (from the config change). Moreover, some bundle2 tests are displaying warning for a legitimate reason. The use of pushkey during the unbundle process may requires the 'wlock' after 'lock' (around the whole unbundle process was taken). This is non-trivial to fix, so I better have the check on, with the warning in the test than the check off. See issue4596 for details.
Sun, 12 Apr 2015 15:37:59 -0400 wlock: do not warn for non-wait locking
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Sun, 12 Apr 2015 15:37:59 -0400] rev 24750
wlock: do not warn for non-wait locking We are warning about lock acquired in the wrong order because this can create dead-lock situation. But non-wait acquisition will not block and therefore not create a dead-lock. So we do not need to wait in such case.
Sun, 12 Apr 2015 14:27:42 -0400 develwarn: include call site in the simple message version
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Sun, 12 Apr 2015 14:27:42 -0400] rev 24749
develwarn: include call site in the simple message version Just displaying the warning makes it quite hard to recognise the guilty code quickly and using --traceback for all calls is not very convenient. So we include the call site with all simple message to help developer to recognise errors sources.
Sun, 12 Apr 2015 14:26:11 -0400 develwarn: handle the end of line inside the function itself
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Sun, 12 Apr 2015 14:26:11 -0400] rev 24748
develwarn: handle the end of line inside the function itself The traceback version should not have a end of line at all. The non-traceback version will requires the same things soon.
Sun, 12 Apr 2015 14:24:28 -0400 develwarn: refactor the developer warning logic
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Sun, 12 Apr 2015 14:24:28 -0400] rev 24747
develwarn: refactor the developer warning logic The logic is currently duplicated and we plan to make it a bit smarter. So we move it into a function first to make the update more robust and simple.
Wed, 15 Apr 2015 01:20:48 -0400 lock: update the docstring with order information
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 15 Apr 2015 01:20:48 -0400] rev 24746
lock: update the docstring with order information Lock must be acquired in a specific order to avoid dead-lock. This was documented on the wiki, but having this information in the docstring is also useful.
Sun, 12 Apr 2015 13:28:35 -0400 wlock: reword the devel warning
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Sun, 12 Apr 2015 13:28:35 -0400] rev 24745
wlock: reword the devel warning We change the wording of the developer warning: - "lock" taken before "wlock" + "wlock" acquired after "lock" The goals here are to: - Put the "subject" as the first word, - use "acquired" instead of "taken" since it seems more accurate.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -50 -30 +30 +50 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip