Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 18:04:38 -0700] rev 31999
keepalive: send HTTP request headers in a deterministic order
An upcoming patch will add low-level testing of the bytes being sent
over the wire. As part of developing that test, I discovered that the
order of headers in HTTP requests wasn't deterministic. This patch
makes the order deterministic to make things easier to test.
Denis Laxalde <denis@laxalde.org> [Sat, 15 Apr 2017 11:29:42 +0200] rev 31998
revset: properly parse "descend" argument of followlines()
We parse "descend" symbol as a Boolean using getboolean (prior extraction by
getargsdict already checked that it is a symbol).
In tests, check for error cases and vary Boolean values here and there.
Denis Laxalde <denis@laxalde.org> [Sat, 15 Apr 2017 11:26:09 +0200] rev 31997
revsetlang: add a getboolean helper function
This will be used to parse followlines's "descend" argument.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:15:02 +0200] rev 31996
track-tags: write all tag changes to a file
The tag changes information we compute is now written to disk. This gives
hooks full access to that data.
The format picked for that file uses a 2 characters prefix for the action:
-R: tag removed
+A: tag added
-M: tag moved (old value)
+M: tag moved (new value)
This format allows hooks to easily select the line that matters to them without
having to post process the file too much. Here is a couple of examples:
* to select all newly tagged changeset, match "^+",
* to detect tag move, match "^.M",
* to detect tag deletion, match "-R".
Once again we rely on the fact the tag tests run through all possible
situations to test this change.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:14:55 +0200] rev 31995
track-tags: compute the actual differences between tags pre/post transaction
We now compute the proper actuall differences between tags before and after the
transaction. This catch a couple of false positives in the tests.
The compute the full difference since we are about to make this data available
to hooks in the next changeset.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Tue, 28 Mar 2017 06:38:09 +0200] rev 31994
track-tags: introduce first bits of tags tracking during transaction
This changeset introduces detection of tags changes during transaction. When
this happens a 'tag_moved=1' argument is set for hooks, similar to what we do
for bookmarks and phases.
This code is disabled by default as there are still various performance
concerns. Some require a smarter use of our existing tag caches and some other
require rework around the transaction logic to skip execution when unneeded.
These performance improvements have been delayed, I would like to be able to
experiment and stabilize the feature behavior first.
Later changesets will push the concept further and provide a way for hooks to
know what are the actual changes introduced by the transaction. Similar work
is needed for the other families of changes (bookmark, phase, obsolescence,
etc). Upgrade of the transaction logic will likely be performed at the same
time.
The current code can report some false positive when .hgtags file changes but
resulting tags are unchanged. This will be fixed in the next changeset.
For testing, we simply globally enable a hook in the tag test as all the
possible tag update cases should exist there. A couple of them show the false
positive mentioned above.
See in code documentation for more details.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Tue, 28 Mar 2017 05:06:56 +0200] rev 31993
tags: introduce a function to return a valid fnodes list from revs
This will get used to compare tags between two set of revisions during a
transaction (pre and post heads). The end goal is to be able to track tags
movement in transaction hooks.
Denis Laxalde <denis.laxalde@logilab.fr> [Fri, 14 Apr 2017 14:25:06 +0200] rev 31992
context: possibly yield initial fctx in blockdescendants()
If initial 'fctx' has changes in line range with respect to its parents, we
yield it first. This makes 'followlines(..., descend=True)' consistent with
'descendants()' revset which yields the starting revision.
We reuse one iteration of blockancestors() which does exactly what we want.
In test-annotate.t, adjust 'startrev' in one case to cover the situation where
the starting revision does not touch specified line range.
Denis Laxalde <denis.laxalde@logilab.fr> [Fri, 14 Apr 2017 14:09:26 +0200] rev 31991
context: add an assertion checking linerange consistency in blockdescendants()
If this assertion fails, this indicates a flaw in the algorithm. So fail fast
instead of possibly producing wrong results.
Also extend the target line range in test to catch a merge changeset with all
its parents.
Kostia Balytskyi <ikostia@fb.com> [Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:34:26 -0700] rev 31990
windows: add win32com.shell to demandimport ignore list
Module 'appdirs' tries to import win32com.shell (and catch ImportError as an
indication of failure) to check whether some further functionality should
be implemented one or another way [1]. Of course, demandimport lets it down, so
if we want appdirs to work we have to add it to demandimport's ignore list.
The reason we want appdirs to work is becuase it is used by setuptools [2] to
determine egg cache location. Only fairly recent versions of setuptools depend
on this so people don't see this often.
[1] https://github.com/ActiveState/appdirs/blob/master/appdirs.py#L560
[2] https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/blob/
aae0a928119d2a178882c32bded02270e30d0273/pkg_resources/__init__.py#L1369
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:28:15 +0200] rev 31989
obsolescence: add test for the "branch replacement" logic during push, case D6
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg:
issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:27:54 +0200] rev 31988
obsolescence: add test dor the "branch replacement" logic during push, case D4
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg:
issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:27:42 +0200] rev 31987
obsolescence: add test for the "branch replacement" logic during push, case D2
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg:
issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:27:28 +0200] rev 31986
obsolescence: add test for the "branch replacement" logic during push, case D1
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg:
issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:27:05 +0200] rev 31985
obsolescence: add test for the "branch replacement" logic during push, case C4
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg:
issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:26:51 +0200] rev 31984
obsolescence: add test for the "branch replacement" logic during push, case C3
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg:
issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:26:37 +0200] rev 31983
obsolescence: add test for the "branch replacement" logic during push, case C2
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg:
issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:25:59 +0200] rev 31982
obsolescence: add test for the "branch replacement" logic during push, case B3
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg:
issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:25:44 +0200] rev 31981
obsolescence: add test for the "branch replacement" logic during push, case A8
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg:
issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:25:26 +0200] rev 31980
obsolescence: add test for the "branch replacement" logic during push, case A7
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg:
issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:25:11 +0200] rev 31979
obsolescence: add test for the "branch replacement" logic during push, case A6
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg:
issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:24:57 +0200] rev 31978
obsolescence: add test for the "branch replacement" logic during push, case A5
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg:
issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:23:39 +0200] rev 31977
obsolescence: add test for the "branch replacement" logic during push, case A4
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg:
issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:23:18 +0200] rev 31976
obsolescence: add test for the "branch replacement" logic during push, case A3
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg:
issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test case.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:23:01 +0200] rev 31975
obsolescence: add test for the "branch replacement" logic during push, case A2
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg:
issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test case.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:22:46 +0200] rev 31974
obsolescence: add test for the "branch replacement" logic during push, case A1
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg:
issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test case.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:22:25 +0200] rev 31973
obsolescence: add test utility for the "branch replacement" logic during push
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg:
issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test case.
This changeset introduce the common setup script used by these tests.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:55:16 +0200] rev 31972
obsolescence: add test case D-4 for obsolescence markers exchange
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case D-4: unknown changeset in between known on
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:54:43 +0200] rev 31971
obsolescence: add test case D-3 for obsolescence markers exchange
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case D3: missing prune target (prune not in "pushed set")
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:54:19 +0200] rev 31970
obsolescence: add test case D-2 for obsolescence markers exchange
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce D-2: missing prune target (prune in "pushed set")
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total