Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:30:17 +0200] rev 45554
rust: update Cargo.lock
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9080
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:30:00 +0200] rev 45553
rust-tests: add test to check if `Cargo.lock` is up-to-date
An out-of-date `Cargo.lock` is the source of rebase conflicts, prevents a
reproductible build, introduces desync between the series that introduces a
change in dependencies and the one that eventually commits the `Cargo.lock`,
and is just a general annoyance.
This commit demonstrates that the test works, the next one fixes the
currently out-of-date `Cargo.lock`.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9079
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 01 Sep 2020 18:08:24 +0530] rev 45552
scmutil: introduce function to check whether repo uses treemanifest or not
In an upcoming patch, I wanted to check whether current repo uses treemanifest
or not.
I looked for a function and found that at all places we manually check for the
requirement in repo requirements. I guess having a dedicated function for that
is much better.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8981
Valentin Gatien-Baron <vgatien-baron@janestreet.com> [Thu, 03 Sep 2020 11:07:47 -0400] rev 45551
chg: make is possible to call by default an hg binary located next to chg
When a single version of hg is in use and it's in the PATH, using chg
is just a matter of calling chg.
But when there are multiple installations of hg+chg around, and hg is
referred to with an absolute path, using chg is more annoying because
it requires both changing the invocation to hg to use chg, but also
setting CHGHG.
Currently, we set HGPATH when we build chg to remove the need to set
CHGHG in the previous paragraph. But that means chg now hardcodes its
installation path, which makes the installation not relocatable. Hence
this proposal to make chg find ./hg relative to itself (as opposed to
CHGHG=./hg which find hg relative to cwd).
This only works on linux as written, but since it's opt-in, it sounds
fine.
Tested by hand, as I'm not sure how else to test this.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9006
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de> [Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:44:21 +0200] rev 45550
phases: fix performance regression with Python 2
Unlike Python 3, xrange doesn't support efficient "in" and uses a linear
time scan instead. Expand the condition to handle it fast.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9072
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 23 Sep 2020 09:04:32 -0700] rev 45549
rebase: move check for unresolved conflicts into lower-level rebasenode()
I want to add another call to `rebasenode()` and it's better to not
have to duplicate the check.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9075
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:40:26 -0700] rev 45548
rebase: add dryrun property to rebaseruntime
I want to be able to check the property in
`rebaseruntime._rebasenode()`. Passing the value via the runtime is a
convenient way.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9074
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 23 Sep 2020 09:21:26 -0700] rev 45547
rebase: when collapsing, p1 == dest, so use the former only
`dest` is the destination we're rebasing onto, which is always the
same as `p1` when using `--collapse`. This lets us simplify a bit.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9073
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:37:03 -0700] rev 45546
rebase: remove redundant isinmemory argument from _origrebase()
The argument is redundant with `rbst.inmemory`, which makes it unclear
what to do if they were somehow different.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9070
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 22 Sep 2020 23:18:37 -0700] rev 45545
largefiles: prevent in-memory merge instead of switching to on-disk
I enabled in-memory merge by default while testing some changes. I
spent quite some time troubleshooting why largefiles was still
creating an on-disk mergestate. Then I found out that it ignores the
callers `wc` argument to `mergemod._update()` and always uses on-disk
merge. This patch changes that so we raise an error if largefiles is
used with in-memory merge. That way we'll notice if in-memory merge is
used with largefiles instead of silently replacing ignoring the
`overlayworkingctx` instance and updating the working copy instead.
I felt a little bad that this would break things more for users with
both largefiles and in-memory rebase enabled. So I also added a
higher-level override to make sure that largefiles disables in-memory
rebase. It turns out that that fixes `run-tests.py -k largefiles
--extra-config-opt rebase.experimental.inmemory=1`.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9069