rebase: rebase changesets in topo order (issue5370) (BC) There are two reasons that rebase should be done this way: 1. This would make rebasing faster because it would minimize the total number of files to be checked out in the process, as it don't need to switch back and forth between branches. 2. It makes resolving conflicts easier as user has a better context. This commit changes the behavior in "Test multiple root handling" of test-rebase-obsolete.t. It is an expected change which reflects the new behavior that commits in a branch are grouped together when rebased.

dispatch: make hg --profile wrap reposetup Move profiling.maybeprofile() from _runcommand to _dispatch() so that profiler output will include reposetup.

dispatch: change indentation level in _dispatch() Add an if True: placeholder for a profiling context manager that will be added in the next commit, for the purpose of reducing size of the diff due to trivial indentation changes. This change should be a no-op.

log: drop outdated optimization to walk revisions in reverse order Since revset is computed lazily, there would be no (or little) benefit to reverse 'revs' temporarily.

graphlog: preserve topo sort even if additional filter options specified Use ordered=revset.followorder instead. This change is logically the same as fa5e4f58dfbc.

transaction: open a file with checkambig=True to avoid file stat ambiguity Before this patch, if steps below occurs at "the same time in sec", all of mtime, ctime and size are same between (1) and (3). 1. append data to revlog-style file (and close transaction) 2. discard appended data by truncation of rollback 3. append same size but different data to revlog-style file again Therefore, cache validation doesn't work after (3) as expected. To avoid file stat ambiguity around truncation, this patch opens a file with checkambig=True. This is a part of ExactCacheValidationPlan. https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/ExactCacheValidationPlan