Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 06:25:09 +0100] rev 51435
chainsaw-update: exit early if one of the intermediate command fails
That will prevent the user to be presented with a start that pretend to be
consistent with the request, but is not.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 03:32:35 +0100] rev 51434
chainsaw-update: lock the repository for the duration of the operation
This should prevent and catch some misusage where something else try to touch
the repository.
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 11:41:55 +0100] rev 51433
chainsaw-update: taking care of initial cloning
Perhaps we should go just a bit lower level than this `instance()`,
since the main added value in our use-case is full path resolution,
that we need to do anyway for the rmtree cleanup.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 11:30:58 +0100] rev 51432
chainsaw-update: use a graph with branching in graph
This will be relevant for the next improvement of `chainsaw-update`.
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Wed, 17 Jan 2024 14:39:06 +0100] rev 51431
chainsaw-update: log actual locks breaking
Previously, the command would simply state that it was about
to break locks, not if there was actually some to break.
This version is race-free. It would be also possible to display
the content of the lock before hand (not race-free but informative
in almost all cases).
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Wed, 17 Jan 2024 14:26:58 +0100] rev 51430
vfs: have tryunlink tell what it did
It is useful in certain circumstances to know whether vfs.tryunlink()
actually removed something or not, be it for logging purposes.
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Sat, 26 Nov 2022 12:23:56 +0100] rev 51429
chainsaw: new extension for dangerous operations
The first provided command is `chainsaw-update`, whose one and single job is
to make sure that it will pull, update and purge the target repository,
no matter what may be in the way (locks, notably), see docstring for rationale.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 03:45:07 +0100] rev 51428
rust: disable the RustIndex without persistent nodemap
See rational inline.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 03:44:56 +0100] rev 51427
rust: stop claiming the C index is compatible with the rust code
This is no longer the case since the introduction of the pure Rust Index, and
was probably not the case since the MixedIndex itself.
So we fix the dedicated attribute value.
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:11:26 +0100] rev 51426
rust-index: remove one collect when converting back
Turns out this is slightly faster. Sending the results back to Python is still
the most costly (like 75% of the time) of the whole method, but it's about
as fast as it can be now.
hg perf::phases on mozilla-try-2023-03-22
before: 0.267114
after: 0.247101
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:06:16 +0100] rev 51425
rust-index: improve phase computation speed
While less memory efficient, using an array is *much* faster than using a
HashMap, especially with the default hasher. It even makes the code simpler,
so I'm not really sure what I was thinking in the first place, maybe it's more
obvious now.
This fix a significant performance regression when using the rust version of the
code. (however, the C code still outperform rust on this operation)
hg perf::phases on mozilla-try-2023-03-22
- 6.6.3: 0.451239 seconds
- before: 0.982495 seconds
- after: 0.265347 seconds
- C code: 0.183241 second
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 06:37:25 +0100] rev 51424
phases: directly update the phase sets in advanceboundary
This is similar to what we do in retractboundary. There is no need to invalidate
the cache if we have everything at hand to update it.