Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:04:48 -0700] rev 41938
scmutil: document matcher argument of movedirstate()
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6120
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:42:29 -0700] rev 41937
uncommit: move _movedirstate() to scmutil for reuse
The function should be applicable generically when moving from one
commit to another. I'll try to add more callers when I find time.
I'm not convinced it's handling all the cases correctly, but we should
have a generic function for this kind of operation, so I think it
belongs somewhere in core (not in the uncommit extension).
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6119
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:20:26 -0700] rev 41936
copies: remove dependency on scmutil by directly using match.exact()
I want to add a dependency from scmutil.copies(), so I need to remove
this dependency first.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6118
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:35:36 -0700] rev 41935
uncommit: convert _fixdirstate() into _movedirstate()
_fixdirstate() already also updates to the given commit, so let's
rename it to _movedirstate(). Also update the documentation and drop
the unnecessary "curctx" argument, since that should always be
repo['.'].
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6117
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 11 Mar 2019 02:34:12 +0100] rev 41934
updatecaches: also warm the tags caches
Resolving any name requires the tags cache to be warm. We make sure that `hg
debugupdatecache` warm the tag cache entry too.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 11 Mar 2019 02:32:21 +0100] rev 41933
updatecaches: also warm revbranchcache for filtered revisions
We are in the "full" case, so we better warm everything we can.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Wed, 13 Feb 2019 15:50:14 +0530] rev 41932
copies: handle a case when both merging csets are not descendant of merge base
This patch fix the behaviour of fullcopytracing algorithm in the case
when both the merging csets are not the descendant of merge base.
Although it seems to be the rare case when both the csets are not
descendant of merge base. But it can be seen in most of cases of
content-divergence in evolve extension, where merge base is the common
predecessor.
Previous patch added a test where this algorithm can fail to continue
because of an assumption that only one of the two csets can be dirty.
This patch fix that error.
For refrence I suggest you to look into the previous discussion held
on a patch sent by Pulkit: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3896
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5963
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Thu, 14 Feb 2019 16:09:43 +0530] rev 41931
copies: add test that makes both the merging csets dirty and fails
This patch is a part of series which is about the case when both the merging
csets are not descendant of merge base. The existing code assumes if c1 is
dirty there shouldn't be any partial copies from c2 i.e both2['incomplete']
and same for c2, if c2 is dirty both1['incomplete'] should be empty,
but this is not the right assumption.
Now as we know we can have both c1 and c2 dirty at the same time, it
is possible that c1 is dirty and both2['incomplete'] has some value.
Or if c2 is dirty and both1['incomplete'] has some value.
Added test shows that because of this assumption it could fail.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5962