Thu, 24 Sep 2015 20:22:59 -0700 test-lock.py: add a lock wrapper that allows faking the PID
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Thu, 24 Sep 2015 20:22:59 -0700] rev 26384
test-lock.py: add a lock wrapper that allows faking the PID This will be used in upcoming patches to create locks that appear as if they're being created by child processes.
Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:37 -0700 lock: add a wrapper to os.getpid() to make testing easier
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:37 -0700] rev 26383
lock: add a wrapper to os.getpid() to make testing easier This will allow us to fake locks across processes more easily.
Thu, 24 Sep 2015 19:52:34 -0700 test-lock.py: move temp dir generation to testcase
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Thu, 24 Sep 2015 19:52:34 -0700] rev 26382
test-lock.py: move temp dir generation to testcase In upcoming patches we'll want to create multiple test state objects with a common test directory.
Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:33:13 -0700 test-lock.py: copy-edit assertions about file existing
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:33:13 -0700] rev 26381
test-lock.py: copy-edit assertions about file existing Before: expected lock to exists but actually did not exists After: expected lock to exist but actually did not exist
Sat, 26 Sep 2015 21:43:13 -0700 revlog: don't flush data file after every added revision
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 26 Sep 2015 21:43:13 -0700] rev 26380
revlog: don't flush data file after every added revision The current behavior of revlogs is to flush the data file when writing data to it. Tracing system calls revealed that changegroup processing incurred numerous write(2) calls for values much smaller than the default buffer size (Python defaults to 4096, but it can be adjusted based on detected block size at run time by CPython). The reason we flush revlogs is so readers have all data available. For example, the current code in revlog.py will re-open the revlog file (instead of seeking an existing file handle) to read the text of a revision. This happens when starting a new delta chain when adding several revisions from changegroups, for example. Yes, this is likely sub-optimal (we should probably be sharing file descriptors between readers and writers to avoid the flushing and associated overhead of re-opening files). While flushing revlogs is necessary, it appears all callers are diligent about flushing files before a read is performed (see buildtext() in _addrevision()), making the flush in _writeentry() redundant and unncessary. So, we remove it. In practice, this means we incur a write(2) a) when the buffer is full (typically 4096 bytes) b) when a new delta chain is created rather than after every added revision. This applies to every revlog, but by volume it mostly impacts filelogs. Removing the redundant flush from _writeentry() significantly reduces the number of write(2) calls during changegroup processing on my Linux machine. When applying a changegroup of the hg repo based on my local repo, the total number of write(2) calls during application of the mercurial/localrepo.py revlogs dropped from 1,320 to 217 with this patch applied. Total I/O related system calls dropped from 1,577 to 474. When unbundling a mozilla-central gzipped bundle (264,403 changesets with 1,492,215 changes to 222,507 files), total write(2) calls dropped from 1,252,881 to 827,106 and total system calls dropped from 3,601,259 to 3,178,636 - a reduction of 425,775! While the system call reduction is significant, it appears to have no impact on wall time on my Linux and Windows machines. Still, fewer syscalls is fewer syscalls. Surely this can't hurt. If nothing else, it makes examining remaining system call usage simpler and opens the door to experimenting with the performance impact of different buffer sizes.
Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:08:18 -0700 revlog: use existing file handle when reading during _addrevision
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:08:18 -0700] rev 26379
revlog: use existing file handle when reading during _addrevision _addrevision() may need to read from revlogs as part of computing deltas. Previously, we would flush existing file handles and open a new, short-lived file handle to perform the reading. If we have an existing file handle, it seems logical to reuse it for reading instead of opening a new file handle. This patch makes that the new behavior. After this patch, revlog files are only reopened when adding revisions if the revlog is switched from inline to non-inline. On Linux when unbundling a bundle of the mozilla-central repo, this patch has the following impact on system call counts: Call Before After Delta write 827,639 673,390 -154,249 open 700,103 684,089 -16,014 read 74,489 74,489 0 fstat 493,924 461,896 -32,028 close 249,131 233,117 -16,014 stat 242,001 242,001 0 lstat 18,676 18,676 0 lseek 20,268 20,268 0 ioctl 14,652 13,173 -1,479 TOTAL 3,180,758 2,930,679 -250,079 It's worth noting that many of the open() calls fail due to missing files. That's why there are many more open() calls than close(). Despite the significant system call reduction, this change does not seem to have a significant performance impact on Linux. On Windows 10 (not a VM, on a SSD), this patch appears to reduce unbundle time for mozilla-central from ~960s to ~920s. This isn't as significant as I was hoping. But a decrease it is nonetheless. Still, Windows unbundle performance is still >2x slower than Linux. Despite the lack of significant gains, fewer system calls is fewer system calls. If nothing else, this will narrow the focus of potential areas to optimize in the future.
Sun, 27 Sep 2015 15:59:19 -0700 revlog: always open revlogs for reading and appending
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 27 Sep 2015 15:59:19 -0700] rev 26378
revlog: always open revlogs for reading and appending An upcoming patch will teach revlogs to use the existing file handle to read revision data instead of opening a new file handle just for quick reads. For this to work, files must be opened for reading as well. This patch is merely cosmetic: there are no behavior changes.
Sun, 27 Sep 2015 15:48:35 -0700 revlog: support using an existing file handle when reading revlogs
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 27 Sep 2015 15:48:35 -0700] rev 26377
revlog: support using an existing file handle when reading revlogs Currently, the low-level revlog reading code always opens a new file handle. In some key scenarios, the revlog is already opened and an existing file handle could be used to read. This patch paves the road to that by teaching various revlog reading functions to accept an optional existing file handle to read from.
Sun, 27 Sep 2015 15:31:50 -0700 revlog: add docstring for checkinlinesize()
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 27 Sep 2015 15:31:50 -0700] rev 26376
revlog: add docstring for checkinlinesize() The name is deceptive: it does more than just "check." Add a docstring to clarify what's going on.
Sun, 27 Sep 2015 18:46:53 -0700 windows: insert file positioning call between reads and writes
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 27 Sep 2015 18:46:53 -0700] rev 26375
windows: insert file positioning call between reads and writes fopen() and fdopen() have a unique-to-Windows requirement that transitions between read and write operations in files opened in modes r+, w+, and a+ perform a file positioning call (fsetpos, fseek, or rewind) in between. While the MSDN docs don't say what will happen if this is not done, observations reveal that Python raises an IOError with errno 0. Furthermore, I /think/ this behavior isn't deterministic. But I can reproduce it reliably with subsequent patches applied that open revlogs in a+ mode and perform both reads and writes. This patch introduces a proxy class for file handles opened in r+, w+, and a+ mode on Windows. The class intercepts calls and audits whether a file positioning function has been called between read and write operations. If not, a dummy, no-op seek to the current file position is performed. This appears to be sufficient to "trick" Windows into allowing transitions between read and writes without raising errors.
Sat, 26 Sep 2015 15:20:32 +0900 tests: suppress verbose output of svn transaction
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 26 Sep 2015 15:20:32 +0900] rev 26374
tests: suppress verbose output of svn transaction Subversion 1.9 shows more verbose messages than 1.8 and the tests fail because of them. These outputs are not important in our tests, so let's suppress them by -q or grep -v.
Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:54:47 +0900 formatter: use dict.update() to set arguments passed to write functions
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:54:47 +0900] rev 26373
formatter: use dict.update() to set arguments passed to write functions This isn't important, but update() is better than loop in general.
Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:51:48 +0900 formatter: verify number of arguments passed to write functions
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:51:48 +0900] rev 26372
formatter: verify number of arguments passed to write functions zip() takes the shortest length, which can be a source of bug.
Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:50:47 +0900 help: unify handling of DEPRECATED/EXPERIMENTAL keywords
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:50:47 +0900] rev 26371
help: unify handling of DEPRECATED/EXPERIMENTAL keywords This fixes listexts() to exclude translated "(DEPRECATED)" marker correctly. On the other hand, help_() doesn't need translated keywords, but I don't think it's worth to separate untranslated keywords just for it.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -14 +14 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip