Tue, 30 Mar 2021 02:33:12 +0200 refactor: prefer lookup by revision, even for null
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de> [Tue, 30 Mar 2021 02:33:12 +0200] rev 46842
refactor: prefer lookup by revision, even for null While the nullid lookup is a special case, it is still more complicated. The common pattern is to lookup via nullrev so be consistent here. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10280
Mon, 29 Mar 2021 01:35:54 +0200 setdiscovery: simplify by using tiprev directly
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de> [Mon, 29 Mar 2021 01:35:54 +0200] rev 46841
setdiscovery: simplify by using tiprev directly tip() uses tiprev() and reads the node from it, so drop a layer of indirection. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10289
Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:50:37 +0200 test: enforce master to be the default branch in test
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:50:37 +0200] rev 46840
test: enforce master to be the default branch in test Newer git issue a message about this. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10281
Sun, 28 Mar 2021 21:53:39 +0200 fix: merge imports
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de> [Sun, 28 Mar 2021 21:53:39 +0200] rev 46839
fix: merge imports Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10277
Thu, 11 Feb 2021 21:23:05 -0800 tests: update divergence test for `hg fix` to actually result in divergence
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 11 Feb 2021 21:23:05 -0800] rev 46838
tests: update divergence test for `hg fix` to actually result in divergence We have a test that checks that `hg fix` errors out if it might cause divergence. However, the test simply prunes the commit it then tries to fix, so fixing it wouldn't actually cause divergence. That works because the implementation is simple enough that it doesn't notice the difference. I'm about to make the implementation smarter, so let's fix the test first. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10267
Tue, 23 Mar 2021 22:48:27 -0700 rebase: don't call rewriteutil.precheck() with to-be-skipped commits
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Mar 2021 22:48:27 -0700] rev 46837
rebase: don't call rewriteutil.precheck() with to-be-skipped commits It's clearly incorrect to call `rewriteutil.precheck()` for commits that we're not about to rewrite. We haven't noticed yet because the function doesn't check for divergence, but I'm about to teach it to do that. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10259
Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:15:40 -0700 reabase: call rewriteutil.precheck() a bit later
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:15:40 -0700] rev 46836
reabase: call rewriteutil.precheck() a bit later We now filter out descendants of divergence-causing commits in `_handleskippingobsolete()`. The filtered-out commits are removed from the rebase set (`destmap` and `state`). We should therefore call `rewriteutil.precheck()` after `_handleskippingobsolete()`. This patch does that. It hasn't mattered so far because `rewriteutil.precheck()` doesn't yet check for divergence, but it will soon. This affects one test where we now fail because the user is trying to rebase an ancestor instead of failing because they tried to rebase a public commit. We have several similar tests just after, where we still fail because of the phase, so that seems fine. The difference in behavior also seems fine to me. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10258
Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:49:31 -0700 rebase: set `prepared = True` at very end of `_preparenewrebase()`
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:49:31 -0700] rev 46835
rebase: set `prepared = True` at very end of `_preparenewrebase()` Once we've set `rebaseruntime.prepared = True`, `rebaseruntime.repo` starts returning the unfiltered repo. That will make my next patch break, because that patch moves the call to `rewriteutil.precheck()` after the call to `_handleskippingobsolete()`, which current happens after `prepared = True`. We therefore need to prepare by moving `prepared = True` a bit later, after `_handleskippingobsolete()`. I don't think that matters for that call. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10257
Fri, 19 Mar 2021 22:52:59 -0700 rebase: filter out descendants of divergence-causing commits earlier
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Mar 2021 22:52:59 -0700] rev 46834
rebase: filter out descendants of divergence-causing commits earlier `hg rebase` treats obsolete commits differently depending what has happened to the commit: 1) Obsolete commit without non-obsolete successors: Skipped, and a note is printed ("it has no successor"). 2) Obsolete commit with a successor in the destination (ancestor of it): Skipped, and a note is printed ("already in destination"). 3) Obsolete commit with a successor in the rebase set: The commit and its descendants are skipped, and a note is printed ("not rebasing <commit> and its descendants as this would cause divergence"), unless `allowdivergence` config set. 4) Obsolete commit with a successor elsewhere: Error ("this rebase will cause divergences"), unless `allowdivergence` config set. Before this patch, we did all those checks up front, except for (3), which was checked later. The later check consisted of two parts: 1) filtering out of descendants, and 2) conditionally printing message if the `allowdivergence` config was not set. This patch makes it so we do the filtering early. A consequence of filtering out divergence-causing commits earlier is that we rebase commits in slightly different order, which has some impact on tests. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10249
Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:34:16 -0700 rebase: clarify names of variables and function related to obsolete revisions
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:34:16 -0700] rev 46833
rebase: clarify names of variables and function related to obsolete revisions Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10248
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip