Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de> [Tue, 30 Mar 2021 02:33:12 +0200] rev 46842
refactor: prefer lookup by revision, even for null
While the nullid lookup is a special case, it is still more complicated.
The common pattern is to lookup via nullrev so be consistent here.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10280
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de> [Mon, 29 Mar 2021 01:35:54 +0200] rev 46841
setdiscovery: simplify by using tiprev directly
tip() uses tiprev() and reads the node from it, so drop a layer of
indirection.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10289
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:50:37 +0200] rev 46840
test: enforce master to be the default branch in test
Newer git issue a message about this.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10281
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de> [Sun, 28 Mar 2021 21:53:39 +0200] rev 46839
fix: merge imports
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10277
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 11 Feb 2021 21:23:05 -0800] rev 46838
tests: update divergence test for `hg fix` to actually result in divergence
We have a test that checks that `hg fix` errors out if it might cause
divergence. However, the test simply prunes the commit it then tries
to fix, so fixing it wouldn't actually cause divergence. That works
because the implementation is simple enough that it doesn't notice the
difference. I'm about to make the implementation smarter, so let's fix
the test first.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10267
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Mar 2021 22:48:27 -0700] rev 46837
rebase: don't call rewriteutil.precheck() with to-be-skipped commits
It's clearly incorrect to call `rewriteutil.precheck()` for commits
that we're not about to rewrite. We haven't noticed yet because the
function doesn't check for divergence, but I'm about to teach it to do
that.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10259
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:15:40 -0700] rev 46836
reabase: call rewriteutil.precheck() a bit later
We now filter out descendants of divergence-causing commits in
`_handleskippingobsolete()`. The filtered-out commits are removed from
the rebase set (`destmap` and `state`). We should therefore call
`rewriteutil.precheck()` after `_handleskippingobsolete()`. This patch
does that. It hasn't mattered so far because `rewriteutil.precheck()`
doesn't yet check for divergence, but it will soon.
This affects one test where we now fail because the user is trying to
rebase an ancestor instead of failing because they tried to rebase a
public commit. We have several similar tests just after, where we
still fail because of the phase, so that seems fine. The difference in
behavior also seems fine to me.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10258
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:49:31 -0700] rev 46835
rebase: set `prepared = True` at very end of `_preparenewrebase()`
Once we've set `rebaseruntime.prepared = True`, `rebaseruntime.repo`
starts returning the unfiltered repo. That will make my next patch
break, because that patch moves the call to `rewriteutil.precheck()`
after the call to `_handleskippingobsolete()`, which current happens
after `prepared = True`. We therefore need to prepare by moving
`prepared = True` a bit later, after `_handleskippingobsolete()`. I
don't think that matters for that call.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10257
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Mar 2021 22:52:59 -0700] rev 46834
rebase: filter out descendants of divergence-causing commits earlier
`hg rebase` treats obsolete commits differently depending what has
happened to the commit:
1) Obsolete commit without non-obsolete successors: Skipped, and a
note is printed ("it has no successor").
2) Obsolete commit with a successor in the destination (ancestor of
it): Skipped, and a note is printed ("already in destination").
3) Obsolete commit with a successor in the rebase set: The commit and
its descendants are skipped, and a note is printed ("not rebasing
<commit> and its descendants as this would cause divergence"), unless
`allowdivergence` config set.
4) Obsolete commit with a successor elsewhere: Error ("this rebase
will cause divergences"), unless `allowdivergence` config set.
Before this patch, we did all those checks up front, except for (3),
which was checked later. The later check consisted of two parts: 1)
filtering out of descendants, and 2) conditionally printing message if
the `allowdivergence` config was not set. This patch makes it so we do
the filtering early.
A consequence of filtering out divergence-causing commits earlier is
that we rebase commits in slightly different order, which has some
impact on tests.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10249
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:34:16 -0700] rev 46833
rebase: clarify names of variables and function related to obsolete revisions
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10248