Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:41:21 +0200 obsolescence: add test case A-1 for obsolescence markers exchange
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:41:21 +0200] rev 31906
obsolescence: add test case A-1 for obsolescence markers exchange About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside. I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue. I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial. They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series. This patch introduce case A-1: pushing a single head Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file. Here are timing to support this claim. # Multiple test files version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t 53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total 52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total 52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total # Single test file version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t 52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total 52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total 53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:40:40 +0200 obsolescence: add setup script for obsolescence markers exchange tests
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:40:40 +0200] rev 31905
obsolescence: add setup script for obsolescence markers exchange tests About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside. I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue. I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial. They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series. This patch introduce the common script that setup the basic environment for the test cases. Once this script is in. We can accept the other patches in any order. Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file. Here are timing to support this claim. # Multiple test files version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t 53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total 52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total 52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total # Single test file version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t 52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total 52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total 53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:03:11 +0200 upgrade: simplify the "origin" dispatch in dry run
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:03:11 +0200] rev 31904
upgrade: simplify the "origin" dispatch in dry run We could compute the final set we need directly.
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 23:11:45 +0200 upgrade: use 'improvement' object for action too
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 23:11:45 +0200] rev 31903
upgrade: use 'improvement' object for action too This simplify multiple pieces of code. For now we restrict this upgrade to the top level function to keep this patch simple.
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 23:10:03 +0200 upgrade: implement equality for 'improvement' object
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 23:10:03 +0200] rev 31902
upgrade: implement equality for 'improvement' object Through the code, we use a mix of 'improvement' object and string. Having a single type would be simpler. For this we need the object to be comparable.
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 22:15:17 +0200 upgrade: simplify some of the initial dispatch for dry run
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 22:15:17 +0200] rev 31901
upgrade: simplify some of the initial dispatch for dry run Since we already have the list of deficiencies, we can use it directly.
Fri, 07 Apr 2017 18:39:27 +0200 upgrade: simplify 'determineactions'
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 07 Apr 2017 18:39:27 +0200] rev 31900
upgrade: simplify 'determineactions' Since we only takes 'deficiencies', we can simplify the function and clarify its arguments.
Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:46:16 +0200 upgrade: filter optimizations outside of 'determineactions'
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:46:16 +0200] rev 31899
upgrade: filter optimizations outside of 'determineactions' This sounds like higher level logic to process arguments. Moving it out of 'determineactions' will allow passing only deficiencies to the function. Then, in a future changeset, we will remove dispatch on "improvement type" within the function. See next changeset for details.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -8 +8 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip