Mon, 29 Jun 2015 11:20:09 -0700 changegroup: properly compute common base in changeggroupsubset (issue4736) stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Mon, 29 Jun 2015 11:20:09 -0700] rev 25677
changegroup: properly compute common base in changeggroupsubset (issue4736) The computation of roots was buggy, any ancestor of a bundled merge which was also a descendant of the parents of a bundled revision were included as part of the bundle. We fix it and add a test for strip (which revealed the problem). Check the test for a practical usecase.
Thu, 25 Jun 2015 22:07:38 +0900 templater: parse \"...\" as string for 2.9.2-3.4 compatibility (issue4733) stable
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Thu, 25 Jun 2015 22:07:38 +0900] rev 25676
templater: parse \"...\" as string for 2.9.2-3.4 compatibility (issue4733) As of Mercurial 3.4, there were several syntax rules to process nested template strings. Unfortunately, they were inconsistent and conflicted each other. a. buildmap() rule - template string is _parsed_ as string, and parsed as template - <\"> is not allowed in nested template: {xs % "{f(\"{x}\")}"} -> parse error - template escaping <\{> is handled consistently: {xs % "\{x}"} -> escaped b. _evalifliteral() rule - template string is _interpreted_ as string, and parsed as template in crafted environment to avoid double processing of escape sequences - <\"> is allowed in nested template: {if(x, "{f(\"{x}\")}")} - <\{> and escape sequences in string literal in nested template are not handled well c. pad() rule - template string is first interpreted as string, and parsed as template, which means escape sequences are processed twice - <\"> is allowed in nested template: {pad("{xs % \"{x}\"}', 10)} Because of the issue of template escaping, issue4714, 7298da81f5a9 (in stable) unified the rule (b) to (a). Then, 576d6c74784b (in default) unified the rule (c) to (b) = (a). But they disabled the following syntax that was somewhat considered valid. {if(rev, "{if(rev, \"{rev}\")}")} {pad("{files % \"{file}\"}", 10)} So, this patch introduces \"...\" literal to work around the escaped-quoted nested template strings. Because this parsing rule exists only for the backward compatibility, it is designed to copy the behavior of old _evalifliteral() as possible. Future patches will introduce a better parsing rule similar to a command substitution of POSIX shells or a string interpolation of Ruby, where extra escapes won't be necessary at all. {pad("{files % "{file}"}", 10)} ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ parsed as a template, not as a string Because <\> character wasn't allowed in a template fragment, this patch won't introduce more breakages. But the syntax of nested templates are interpreted differently by people, there might be unknown issues. So if we want, we could instead remove db7463aa080f, 890845af1ac2 and 7298da81f5a9 from the stable branch as the bug fixed by these patches existed for longer periods. 554d6fcc3c8, "strip single backslash before quotation mark in quoted template", should be superseded by this patch. I'll remove it later.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -2 +2 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip