hook: add hook name information to external hook While we are here, we can also add the hook name information to external hook.

hook: provide hook type information to external hook The python hooks have access to the hook type information. There is not reason for external hook to not be aware of it too. For the record my use case is to make sure a hook script is configured for the right type.

hook: use 'htype' in 'hook' Same rational as for 'runhooks', we fix the naming in another function.

hook: use 'htype' in 'runhooks' Same rational as for '_pythonhook', 'htype' is more accurate and less error prone. We just fixed an error from the 'name'/'hname' confusion and this should prevent them in the future.

hook: fix name used in untrusted message The name used in the message we issue when a hook is untrusted was using "name" which is actually the hook type and not the name of the hook.

hook: use "htype" as variable name in _pythonhook We rename 'name' to 'htype' because it fits the variable content better. Multiple python hooks already use 'htype' as a name for the argument. This makes the difference with "hname" clearer and the code less error prone.

run-tests: auto-replace 'TXNID' output Hooks related to the transaction are aware of the transaction id. By definition this txn-id is unique and different for each transaction. As a result it can never be predicted in test and always needs matching. As a result, touching any like with this data is annoying. We solve the problem once and for all by installing an automatic replacement. In test, this will now show as: TXNID=TXN:$ID$

largefiles: use readasstandin() to read hex hash directly from filectx BTW, C implementation of hexdigest() for SHA-1/256/512 returns hex hash in lower case, and doctest in Python standard hashlib assumes that, too. But it isn't explicitly described in API document or so. Therefore, we can't assume that hexdigest() always returns hex hash in lower case, for any hash algorithms, on any Python runtimes and versions. From point of view of that, it is reasonable for portability that 40800668e019 applies lower() on hex hash in overridefilemerge(). But on the other hand, in largefiles extension, there are still many code paths comparing between hex hashes or storing hex hash into standin file, without lower(). Switching to hash algorithm other than SHA-1 may be good chance to clarify our policy about hexdigest()-ed hash value string. - assume that hexdigest() always returns hex hash in lower case, or - apply lower() on hex hash in appropriate layers to ensure lower-case-ness of it for portability