Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:59:23 +0200] rev 33455
convert: use the new 'phase.registernew' function
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 11 Jul 2017 01:05:27 +0200] rev 33454
localrepo: use the 'registernew' function to set the phase of new commit
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 11 Jul 2017 03:47:25 +0200] rev 33453
phases: add a 'registernew' method to set new phases
This new function will be used by code that adds new changesets. It ajusts the
phase boundary to make sure added changesets are at least in their target
phase (they end up in an higher phase if their parents are in a higher phase).
Having a dedicated function also simplify the phases tracking. All the new
nodes are passed as argument, so we know that all of them needs to have their
new phase registered. We also know that no other nodes will be affected, so no
extra computation are needed.
This function differ from 'retractboundary' where some nodes might change
phase while some other might not. It can also affect nodes not passed as
parameters.
These simplification also apply to the computation itself. For now we use
'_retractboundary' there by convenience, but we may introduces simpler code
later.
While registering new revisions, we still need to check the actual phases of
the added node because it might be higher than the target phase (eg: target is
draft but parent is secret).
We will migrate users over the next changesets.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Mon, 10 Jul 2017 23:50:16 +0200] rev 33452
phases: extract the core of boundary retraction in '_retractboundary'
At the moment the 'retractboundary' function is called for multiple reasons:
First, actually retracting boundaries. There are only two cases for theses:
'hg phase --force' and 'hg qimport'. This will need extra graph computation to
retrieve the phase changes.
Second, setting the phases of newly added changesets. In this case we already
know all the affected nodes and we just needs to register different
information (old phase is None).
Third, when reducing the set of roots when advancing phase. The phase are
already properly tracked so we do not needs anything else in this case.
To deal with this difference in phase tracking, we extract the core logic into
a private method that all three cases can use.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 11 Jul 2017 02:39:52 +0200] rev 33451
phases: track phase movements in 'advanceboundary'
Makes advanceboundary record the phase movement of affected revisions in
tr.changes['phases'].
The tracking is not usable yet because the 'retractboundary' function can also
affect phases.
We'll improve that in the coming changesets.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Mon, 10 Jul 2017 22:18:41 +0200] rev 33450
phases: extract the intermediate set of affected revs
When advancing phases, we compute the new roots for the phases above. During
this process, we need to compute all the revisions that change phases (to the
new target phases). Extract these revisions into a separate variable. This
will be useful to record the phase changes in the transaction.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Mon, 10 Jul 2017 22:22:42 +0200] rev 33449
phase: put retractboundary out of the loop in advanceboundary
It seems that we were calling retractboundary for each phases to process.
Putting the retractboundary out of the loop reduce the number of calls,
helping tracking the phases changes.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:46:10 -0700] rev 33448
match: make unionmatcher a proper matcher
unionmatcher is currently used where only a limited subset of its
functions will be called. Specifically, visitdir() is never
called. The next patch will pass it to dirstate.walk() where it will
matter that visitdir() is correctly implemented, so let's fix
that. Also add the explicitdir etc that will also be assumed by
dirstate.walk() to exist on a matcher.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D58
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 07 Jul 2017 14:39:59 -0700] rev 33447
match: write forceincludematcher using unionmatcher
The forceincludematcher is simply a unionmatcher of a includematcher
(matching paths recursively) with the given matcher. Since the
forceincludematcher is only used by sparse, move it there.
I don't have a good sparse repo setup to test performance impact on.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D57
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 12 Jul 2017 13:57:03 -0700] rev 33446
histedit: extract InterventionRequired transaction handling to utils
rebase will have similar logic, so let's extract it. Besides, it makes
the histedit code more readable.
We may want to parametrize acceptintervention() by the exception(s)
that should result in transaction close.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D66