Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:36:03 -0800 dispatch: only check compatibility against major and minor versions (BC)
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:36:03 -0800] rev 23871
dispatch: only check compatibility against major and minor versions (BC) Extensions can declare compatibility with Mercurial versions. If an error occurs, Mercurial will attempt to pin blame on an extension that isn't marked as compatible. While all bets are off when it comes to the internal API, my experience has shown that a monthly/patch release of Mercurial has never broken any of the extensions I've written. I think that expecting extensions to declare compatibility with every patch release of Mercurial is asking a bit much and adds little to no value. This patch changes the blame logic from exact version matching to only match on the major and minor Mercurial versions. This means that extensions only need to mark themselves as compatible with the major, quarterly releases and not the monthly ones in order to stay current and avoid what is almost certainly unfair blame. This will mean less work for extension authors and almost certainly fewer false positives in the blame attribution.
Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:03:48 -0800 test-extension: use a realistic Mercurial version
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:03:48 -0800] rev 23870
test-extension: use a realistic Mercurial version Mercurial doesn't define the 3rd "patch" version field for major releases. Don't use it in tests.
Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:47:06 -0800 test-extension: improve test readability
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:47:06 -0800] rev 23869
test-extension: improve test readability There was a mountain of text in this file that made reading the tests difficult. Inserting some line breaks greatly improves the situation.
Thu, 18 Dec 2014 19:14:01 -0800 bundle2: enforce parttype as alphanumerical
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Thu, 18 Dec 2014 19:14:01 -0800] rev 23868
bundle2: enforce parttype as alphanumerical The binary format description has always stated that the parttype should be simple, but it was never really enforced. Recent discussions have convinced me we want to keep the part type simple and easy to debug. There is enough extensibility in the rest of the format.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -4 +4 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip