Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:34:23 -0400 subrepo: don't pass the outer repo's --rev or --branch to subrepo incoming() stable
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:34:23 -0400] rev 24876
subrepo: don't pass the outer repo's --rev or --branch to subrepo incoming() When passing a --rev, 'hg incoming -S' previously suffered from the same output truncation or abort that was fixed for 'hg outgoing -S' in the previous patch, for the same reasons. Unlike push, subrepos are currently only pulled when the outer repo is updated, not when the outer repo is pulled. That makes matching 'hg pull' behavior impossible. Listing all incoming csets in the subrepo seems like the most useful behavior, and is consistent with 'hg outgoing -S'.
Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:15:25 -0400 subrepo: don't pass the outer repo's --rev or --branch to subrepo outgoing() stable
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:15:25 -0400] rev 24875
subrepo: don't pass the outer repo's --rev or --branch to subrepo outgoing() The previous behavior didn't reflect what would actually be pushed- push will ignore --rev and --branch in the subrepo and push everything. Therefore, 'push -r {rev}' would not list everything, unless {rev} was also the revision of the subrepo's tip. Worse, if a hash was passed in, the command would abort because that hash would either not be in the outer repo or not in the subrepo.
Mon, 27 Apr 2015 20:25:09 -0400 subrepo: update the help text to account for diff -I/-X gitsubrepo support stable
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Mon, 27 Apr 2015 20:25:09 -0400] rev 24874
subrepo: update the help text to account for diff -I/-X gitsubrepo support The functionality was added in a48b65ab428d.
Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:37:57 -0700 revert: make the interactive mode experimental stable
Laurent Charignon <lcharignon@fb.com> [Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:37:57 -0700] rev 24873
revert: make the interactive mode experimental While fixing issue4304: "record: allow editing new files" we introduced changes in record/crecord. These changes need to be matched with changes in any command using record. Revert is one of these commands and the changes have not been made for this release. Therefore, revert -i should be an experimental feature for this release.
Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:36:10 -0700 shelve: make the interactive mode experimental stable
Laurent Charignon <lcharignon@fb.com> [Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:36:10 -0700] rev 24872
shelve: make the interactive mode experimental While fixing issue4304: "record: allow editing new files" we introduced changes in record/crecord. These changes need to be matched with changes in any command using record. Shelve is one of these commands and the changes have not been made for this release. Therefore, shelve -i should be an experimental feature for this release.
Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:12:41 -0700 help: also hide options marked EXPERIMENTAL stable
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:12:41 -0700] rev 24871
help: also hide options marked EXPERIMENTAL Similar to DEPRECATED, add a way to indicate that options are EXPERIMENTAL.
Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:19:46 -0700 rebase: don't forward "source" argument to rebase (issue4633) stable
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:19:46 -0700] rev 24870
rebase: don't forward "source" argument to rebase (issue4633) `hg pull` takes an optional "source" argument to define the path/url to pull from. Under some circumstances, this option could get proxied to rebase and interpretted as the --source argument to rebase, leading to unexpected behavior. In my local environment, "source" always appears in "opts" in pullrebase. However, when attempting to write a test, I couldn't reproduce this. Instead, the source is being captured as a positional argument in "args." I suspect an interaction between **kwargs and an extension is to blame for the differences in behavior. This is why no test has been written. I have tested behavior locally and the patch has the intended side-effect of making `hg pull --rebase` work again.
Tue, 28 Apr 2015 23:27:18 +0900 histedit: fix reST syntax problem of example code in help document stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 28 Apr 2015 23:27:18 +0900] rev 24869
histedit: fix reST syntax problem of example code in help document To show example code correctly in online help, text block of it should be preceded by "::" and indented.
Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:13:55 -0300 webcommands: fix description of manifest default behavior stable
Wagner Bruna <wbruna@softwareexpress.com.br> [Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:13:55 -0300] rev 24868
webcommands: fix description of manifest default behavior
Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:09:54 -0300 webcommands: fix typo in changelog documentation stable
Wagner Bruna <wbruna@softwareexpress.com.br> [Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:09:54 -0300] rev 24867
webcommands: fix typo in changelog documentation
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip