Sat, 04 Apr 2015 22:30:59 +0900 changelog: inline revlog.__contains__ in case it is used in hot loop
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 04 Apr 2015 22:30:59 +0900] rev 24662
changelog: inline revlog.__contains__ in case it is used in hot loop Currently __contains__ is called only by "rev()" revset, but "x in cl" is a function that is likely to be used in hot loop. revlog.__contains__ is simple enough to duplicate to changelog, so just inline it.
Wed, 08 Apr 2015 02:56:19 +0900 bookmarks: show detailed status about outgoing bookmarks
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 08 Apr 2015 02:56:19 +0900] rev 24661
bookmarks: show detailed status about outgoing bookmarks Before this patch, "hg outgoing -B" shows only difference of bookmarks between two repositories, and it isn't user friendly. This patch shows detailed status about outgoing bookmarks at "hg outgoing -B". To avoid breaking backward compatibility with other tool chains, this patch shows status, only if --verbose is specified,
Wed, 08 Apr 2015 02:56:19 +0900 bookmarks: show detailed status about incoming bookmarks
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 08 Apr 2015 02:56:19 +0900] rev 24660
bookmarks: show detailed status about incoming bookmarks Before this patch, "hg incoming -B" shows only difference of bookmarks between two repositories, and it isn't user friendly. This patch shows detailed status about incoming bookmarks at "hg incoming -B". To avoid breaking backward compatibility with other tool chains, this patch shows status, only if --verbose is specified,
Wed, 08 Apr 2015 02:56:19 +0900 bookmarks: enhance test of showing detail about incoming/outgoing bookmarks
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 08 Apr 2015 02:56:19 +0900] rev 24659
bookmarks: enhance test of showing detail about incoming/outgoing bookmarks
Wed, 08 Apr 2015 02:56:19 +0900 bookmarks: show outgoing bookmarks more exactly
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 08 Apr 2015 02:56:19 +0900] rev 24658
bookmarks: show outgoing bookmarks more exactly Before this patch, "hg outgoing -B" shows only bookmarks added locally. Then, users can't know about bookmarks below before "hg push" execution. - deleted locally (even though it may be added remotely from "hg pull" view) - advanced locally - diverged - changed (= remote revision is unknown for local) This patch shows such bookmarks, too.
Wed, 08 Apr 2015 02:56:19 +0900 bookmarks: show incoming bookmarks more exactly
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 08 Apr 2015 02:56:19 +0900] rev 24657
bookmarks: show incoming bookmarks more exactly Before this patch, "hg incoming -B" shows only bookmarks added remotely. Then, users can't know about bookmarks below before "hg pull" execution. - advanced remotely - diverged - changed (remote revision is unknown for local) This patch shows such bookmarks, too.
Tue, 07 Apr 2015 15:16:19 -0700 test-manifest: add some test coverage for treemanifest
Drew Gottlieb <drgott@google.com> [Tue, 07 Apr 2015 15:16:19 -0700] rev 24656
test-manifest: add some test coverage for treemanifest Similar to the testmanifest test case, testtreemanifest extends the base test case but uses treemanifests instead of manifestdicts. Adding this test provides some basic test coverage of treemanifest within the standard test suite.
Tue, 07 Apr 2015 15:16:19 -0700 test-manifest: make manifesttest a base class that is extended
Drew Gottlieb <drgott@google.com> [Tue, 07 Apr 2015 15:16:19 -0700] rev 24655
test-manifest: make manifesttest a base class that is extended The implementation of the testmanifest test case is moved to a new base class, which is then extended to make the testmanifest. And instead of testmanifest, the subclass is named testmanifestdict because, well, that's what it's testing. This refactoring makes it possible to create alternate versions of what was formerly testmanifest, improving test coverage of different manifestdict implementations.
Tue, 07 Apr 2015 15:16:19 -0700 test-manifest: move parsemanifest() to be a testmanifest class method
Drew Gottlieb <drgott@google.com> [Tue, 07 Apr 2015 15:16:19 -0700] rev 24654
test-manifest: move parsemanifest() to be a testmanifest class method This refactoring lets testmanifest subclasses override this method to return different manifestdict implementations, such as treemanifest. It is useful for later commits where the testmanifest class is moved into a base class, and test cases that extend the base class can provide their own parsemanifest() implementation.
Tue, 07 Apr 2015 22:31:36 -0400 windows: allow readpipe() to actually read data out of the pipe
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Tue, 07 Apr 2015 22:31:36 -0400] rev 24653
windows: allow readpipe() to actually read data out of the pipe It appears that the read() in readpipe() never actually ran before (in test-ssh.t anyway). A print of the size returned from os.fstat() is 0 for every single print output in test-ssh.t, so the data in the pipe ends up being read later instead of when it is available. This is the same problem as Linux, as mentioned in 331cbf088c4c. There are several places in the Windows SSH tests where the order of local output vs remote output differ from the other platforms. This only fixes one of those cases (and interstingly, not the one added in order to test 331cbf088c4c), so there is more investigation needed. However, without this patch, test-ssh.t also has this diff: --- c:/Users/Matt/Projects/hg/tests/test-ssh.t +++ c:/Users/Matt/Projects/hg/tests/test-ssh.t.err @@ -397,11 +397,11 @@ $ hg push --ssh "sh ../ssh.sh" pushing to ssh://user@dummy/*/remote (glob) searching for changes - remote: Permission denied - remote: abort: prechangegroup.hg-ssh hook failed - remote: Permission denied - remote: pushkey-abort: prepushkey.hg-ssh hook failed updating 6c0482d977a3 to public failed! + remote: Permission denied + remote: abort: prechangegroup.hg-ssh hook failed + remote: Permission denied + remote: pushkey-abort: prepushkey.hg-ssh hook failed [1] $ cd .. Output with this change was stable over 600+ runs of test-ssh.t. I initially tried a background thread to read the pipe[1], but this was simpler and the test results were exactly the same. I also tried SetNamedPipeHandleState(), but the PIPE_NOWAIT is for compatibility with LANMAN 2.0, not for async I/O (the results were identical though). [1] http://eyalarubas.com/python-subproc-nonblock.html
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip