Fri, 11 Mar 2016 05:47:39 +0000 tests: stabilize svn output
timeless <timeless@mozdev.org> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 05:47:39 +0000] rev 28469
tests: stabilize svn output With 1.9.3 extra bits were appearing...
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:29:20 +0800 similar: specify unit for ui.progress when operating on files
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:29:20 +0800] rev 28468
similar: specify unit for ui.progress when operating on files
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:18:41 +0800 verify: specify unit for ui.progress when checking files
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:18:41 +0800] rev 28467
verify: specify unit for ui.progress when checking files
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:44:40 +0800 repair: specify unit for ui.progress in rebuildfncache()
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:44:40 +0800] rev 28466
repair: specify unit for ui.progress in rebuildfncache()
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:39:29 +0800 repair: use 'rebuilding' progress topic in rebuildfncache()
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:39:29 +0800] rev 28465
repair: use 'rebuilding' progress topic in rebuildfncache()
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:26:06 +0800 largefiles: use revisions as a ui.progress unit
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:26:06 +0800] rev 28464
largefiles: use revisions as a ui.progress unit Using plural form is consistent with other progress units, and "1 out of 5 revisions" sounds more correct. Also, tests don't show this, but if you have 'speed' item in progress.format config, it shows e.g. '100 revisions/sec', which also seems better.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -6 +6 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip