histedit: render a rolled up description using the proper roll colours Users have rightfully complained that the old behaviour of completely removing the description of a rolled commit makes it difficult to remember what was in that commit. Instead, we now render the removed description in red. I couldn't think of a simpler way to do this. You can't just combine existing curses colours into new effects; only secondary effects like bold or underline can be logically OR'ed to generate a combined text effect. It seems easier to just redundantly keep track of what the roll colour should be.

histedit: define new colour pairs for roll action Red seems like a good colour to indicate removal, since that's the colour we use in diffs. We need three varieties with three different backgrounds corresponding to the possible ways we can display a rule.

histeditrule: split __bytes__ property into prefix and desc In order to be able to colourise the description of the rule, we need to have it as a separate bytestring. Curses doesn't make it easy to take existing text on the screen and give it different properties; we can only add new text with new properties.

merge with stable

packaging: convert to UNIX line endings I must have my editor on Windows configured incorrectly because I submitted patches with Windows line endings :( # skip-blame whitespace only line ending changes Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7421

black: blacken scripts test-check-format.t doesn't appear to detect Python scripts with shebangs. But my editor which is configured to auto run black on Python files does and it appears some files are not blackened. This commit blackens scripts that need it. # skip-blame reformatting Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7420