Jun Wu <quark@fb.com> [Sat, 24 Jun 2017 21:01:28 -0700] rev 33055
test-rebase: add a test showing rebasestate left behind
The test demonstrates that .hg/rebasestate is left behind if "rebase" was
called inside an existing transaction.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:46:35 -0400] rev 33054
identify: rename 'changed' keyword -> 'dirty'
I meant to do this before sending the initial templater support, but forgot.
I'm quite surprised that 'dirty' doesn't occur in more user facing contexts, but
there are a few, like the help for blackbox. It also more obviously mirrors the
'(clean)' state printed by the summary command. I also didn't like that it was
just one letter off from {changes} in the {latesttags} sub-keywords, which has a
totally different meaning.
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sat, 24 Jun 2017 02:39:21 +0900] rev 33053
dispatch: remove unused _loaded
Now, there is no user for dispatch._loaded.
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sat, 24 Jun 2017 02:39:20 +0900] rev 33052
extensions: register functions always at loading extension (
issue5601)
Before this patch, functions defined in extensions are registered via
extra loaders only in _dispatch(). Therefore, loading extensions in
other code paths like below omits registration of functions.
- WSGI service
- operation across repositories (e.g. subrepo)
- test-duplicateoptions.py, using extensions.loadall() directly
To register functions always at loading new extension, this patch
moves implementation for extra loading from dispatch._dispatch() to
extensions.loadall().
AFAIK, only commands module causes cyclic dependency between
extensions module, but this patch imports all related modules just
before extra loading in loadall(), in order to centralize them.
This patch makes extensions.py depend on many other modules, even
though extensions.py itself doesn't. It should be avoided if possible,
but I don't have any better idea. Some other places like below aren't
reasonable for extra loading, IMHO.
- specific function in newly added module:
existing callers of extensions.loadall() should invoke it, too
- hg.repository() or so:
no-repo commands aren't covered by this.
BTW, this patch removes _loaded.add(name) on relocation, because
dispatch._loaded is used only for extraloaders (for similar reason,
"exts" variable is removed, too).
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 24 Jun 2017 23:09:21 -0400] rev 33051
identify: add template support
This is based on a patch proposed last year by Mathias De Maré[1], with a few
changes.
- Tags and bookmarks are now formatted lists, for more flexible queries.
- The templater is populated whether or not [-nibtB] is specified. (Plain
output is unchanged.) This seems more consistent with other templated
commands.
- The 'id' property is a string, instead of a list.
- The parents of 'wdir()' have their own list of attributes.
I left 'id' as a string because it seems very useful for generating version
info. It's also a bit strange because the value and meaning changes depending
on whether or not --debug is passed (short vs full hash), whether the revision
is a merge or not (one hash or two, separated by a '+'), the working directory
or not (node vs p1node), and local or not (remote defaults to tip, and never has
'+'). The equivalent string built with {rev} seems much less useful, and I
couldn't think of a reasonable name, so I left it out.
The discussion seemed to be pointing towards having a list of nodes, with more
than one entry for a merge. It seems simpler to give the nodes a name, and use
{node} for the actual commit probed, especially now that there is a virtual node
for 'wdir()'.
Yuya mentioned using fm.nested() in that thread, so I did for the parent nodes.
I'm not sure if the plan is to fill in all of the context attributes in these
items, or if these nested items should simply be made {p1node} and {p1rev}.
I used ':' as the tag separator for consistency with {tags} in the log
templater. Likewise, bookmarks are separated by a space for consistency with
the corresponding log template.
[1] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2016-August/087039.html
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 24 Jun 2017 15:11:05 -0700] rev 33050
show: show all namespaces in "work" view
This commit addresses a number of deficiencies in `hg show work`'s
output:
* Failure to render tags (it just wasn't implemented)
* Failure to render names associated with non-built-in namespaces
(e.g. remotenames)
* Color names were hardcoded instead of coming from the canonical
source in the namespace
This change has the intended effect of rendering tags and extra
namespaces. It solves an immediate need at Mozilla of having
names from a custom namespace printed, which is blocking us from
switching from a custom `hg wip` revset/template combo to `hg show
work`.
Note that the order of branches and bookmarks changes. This is
because bookmarks are registered before branches in namespaces.py.
We may want to register them last, after tags and branches. Or we
may want to added a weighted field to the namespace to control
display order. Something to think about.
I'm not a big fan of the complexity in the templating layer. There
is a lot of code to basically filter out the special case of
branch=='default' and tag=='tip'. Ideally, we would iterate over
a data structure that had irrelevant/unwanted names pre-filtered.
However, I wasn't sure how to best implement this. We probably
want {namespaces} to emit everything (its current behavior). I
was toying with the following:
* {namespacesnondefaults} variation that filtered values
* A filter function that operated on {namespaces} (I wasn't sure
how to implement this since the filtering layer would see a
"hybrid" instance as opposed to something that was definitely
an iterable of namespaces.)
* A namespaces(...) function where you could specify which values
to return. I like this the most. But it really wants named
arguments to control filtering and we only support named arguments
on revsets, not templates.
I figure perfect is the enemy of good and we can refine templating
support for namespaces in the future. At least now we have a
concrete example of a use case.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 24 Jun 2017 14:44:55 -0700] rev 33049
tests: add more tests for names rendering in `hg show work`
This demonstrates some missing features. This will also help
verify that a subsequent change has the intended effect.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 24 Jun 2017 14:52:15 -0700] rev 33048
namespaces: record and expose whether namespace is built-in
Currently, the templating layer tends to treat each namespace
as a one-off, with explicit usage of {bookmarks}, {tags}, {branch},
etc instead of using {namespaces}. It would be really useful if
we could iterate over namespaces and operate on them generically.
However, some consumers may wish to differentiate namespaces by
whether they are built-in to core Mercurial or provided by extensions.
Expected use cases include ignoring non-built-in namespaces or
emitting a generic label for non-built-in namespaces.
This commit introduces an attribute on namespace instances
that says whether the namespace is "built-in" and then exposes
this to the templating layer.
As part of this, we implement a reusable extension for defining
custom names on each changeset for testing. A second consumer
will be introduced in a subsequent commit.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 24 Jun 2017 13:39:20 -0700] rev 33047
templatekw: expose color name in {namespaces} entries
Templates make use of a "log.<namespace>" label. The <namespace> value
here differs from the actual namespace name in that the namespace
itself is plural but the label/color value is singular.
Expose the color name to the templating layer so log.* labels
can be emitted for {namespaces}.
As part of this, we refactored the logic to eliminate a gnarly
comprehension. We store color names in their own dict because the
lookup can occur in tight loops and we shouldn't have to go to
repo.names[ns] multiple times for every changeset.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 24 Jun 2017 12:47:25 -0700] rev 33046
show: construct changeset templater during dispatch
Previously, we constructed a formatter from a specific template
topic. Then from show() we reached into the internals of the
formatter to resolve a template string to be used to construct
a changeset templater.
A downside to this approach was it limited us to having the
entire template defined in a single entry in the map file. You
couldn't reference other entries in the map file and this would
lead to long templates and redundancy in the map file.
This commit teaches @showview how to instantiate a changeset
templater so we can construct a templater with full access to
the map file. To prove it works, we've split "showwork" into
components.