Sun, 14 Apr 2019 00:46:25 -0700 merge: remove workaround for issue5020
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Sun, 14 Apr 2019 00:46:25 -0700] rev 42163
merge: remove workaround for issue5020 As I explained in the previous commit, I think the filtering added there is a better fix for the issue, so the workaround from 41f6af50c0d8 (merge: fix crash on criss cross merge with dir move and delete (issue5020), 2017-01-31) should no longer be needed. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6245
Fri, 12 Apr 2019 22:03:04 -0700 copies: don't include copies that are not in source in directory move
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 12 Apr 2019 22:03:04 -0700] rev 42162
copies: don't include copies that are not in source in directory move I've been working on a rewrite of mergecopies(). I compared the output of the rewritten version with the current version. I noticed that between FIREFOX_NIGHTLY_59_END and FIREFOX_BETA_60_BASE in the mozilla-unified repo, there were many copies that the current version detected that the rewritten version did not. One example was js/src/gc/Iteration.h -> js/src/gc/PublicIterators.h. Then I realized that js/src/gc/Iteration.h doesn't even exist in FIREFOX_NIGHTLY_59_END. This patch adds a filtering step for the "fullcopy" dict. It turns out that that change also affects the test for issue5020 in test-merge-criss-cross.t. The 'dm' action no longer happens there. At first I thought that the test case change meant that this patch was broken, but I think it's actually correct tha the 'dm' action should not happen there. The result of the bid merge is still the same. I suspect this filtering is a better solution for the issue than 41f6af50c0d8 (merge: fix crash on criss cross merge with dir move and delete (issue5020), 2017-01-31). I also suspect that it was broken just a few months earlier by a005c33d0bd7 (mergecopies: add logic to process incomplete data, 2016-10-04). Note that bid merge had been enabled for a few years at that point, since 19903277f035 (merge: use bid merge by default (BC), 2014-10-01). This patch is still just a workaround. It will be cleaned up soon (with the rewrite of mergecopies()). But doing this in a separate patch makes later patches easier to understand and gives a place to explain why this is changing. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6244
Sat, 13 Apr 2019 00:24:17 -0700 tests: add test for issue5343 (grafting with copies)
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Sat, 13 Apr 2019 00:24:17 -0700] rev 42161
tests: add test for issue5343 (grafting with copies) It seems that issue5353 resulted in a lot of tests in test-graft.t, but the bug actually reported in that issue didn't get a test case. This patch adds one for the "move" and one for the "copy" version of it. I also added a "copy+modify" case, to show what should be a merge conflict. I didn't add one for the "backwards" version of it since the comment says that that was already covered by previous work. The tests added by this patch show the broken behavior (the bug is still open). I suspect the results returned from mergecopies() are not expressive enough to fix this issue: it has a dict for copies to merge with, but that can only give one more filename, but here we need two (one for the path on the remote side and one for the path in the merge base). I want to have it tested anyway since I'm about to refactor mergecopies(). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6242
Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:12:21 -0400 chistedit: use context manager to set verbose ui
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <jordigh@octave.org> [Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:12:21 -0400] rev 42160
chistedit: use context manager to set verbose ui I'm still not exactly sure why this is necessary -- perhaps setting it unconditionally would leak this setting in chg invocations. Regardless, this would have looked very out of place as compared to how this setting is done everywhere else, so at least for the sake of style, let's be consistent with the rest of the codebase.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -4 +4 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip