Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:00:38 +0200 store: optimize fncache._load a bit by dirdecoding the contents in one go
Adrian Buehlmann <adrian@cadifra.com> [Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:00:38 +0200] rev 17604
store: optimize fncache._load a bit by dirdecoding the contents in one go For a netbeans clone on Windows 7 x64: Before: $ hg perffncacheload ! wall 0.124000 comb 0.124801 user 0.124801 sys 0.000000 (best of 76) After: $ hg perffncacheload ! wall 0.096000 comb 0.093601 user 0.078001 sys 0.015600 (best of 97)
Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:00:58 +0200 wireproto: workaround for yield inside try/finally incompatible with python2.4
Thomas Arendsen Hein <thomas@intevation.de> [Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:00:58 +0200] rev 17603
wireproto: workaround for yield inside try/finally incompatible with python2.4
Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:19:56 -0500 merge with stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:19:56 -0500] rev 17602
merge with stable
Sun, 09 Sep 2012 12:43:24 -0400 largefiles: delegate to the wrapped clone command stable
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 09 Sep 2012 12:43:24 -0400] rev 17601
largefiles: delegate to the wrapped clone command This allows the wrapped command's validation code to run (which is currently only to ensure 'noupdate' and 'updaterev' aren't both specified), the copy/pasted unpacking of hg.clone() args to be removed, and any future changes to the base command (however unlikely) to be inherited by largefiles. Unfortunately, the command override can't be swapped entirely for an hg.clone() override because the extra --all-largefiles arg needs to be injected. It also isn't enough to call the wrapped clone command and leave the caching code after it, because the file caching code needs access to the destination repo, which is only available from hg.clone(). An alternative would be to use the dest path in the clone command override to re-obtain a reference to the repo. A slight deviation from the regular hg.clone() function is that the repo is NOT deleted if the caching fails, but that was also the previous behavior. Maybe it should for consistency?
Sun, 09 Sep 2012 12:09:53 -0400 largefiles: don't convert dest=None to dest=hg.defaultdest() in clone command stable
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 09 Sep 2012 12:09:53 -0400] rev 17600
largefiles: don't convert dest=None to dest=hg.defaultdest() in clone command A status message is output if hg.clone() determines the default destination because None was provided. The previous code never passed None to hg.clone().
Sun, 09 Sep 2012 03:37:38 -0400 largefiles: restore caching of largefiles with 'clone -U --all-largefiles' stable
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 09 Sep 2012 03:37:38 -0400] rev 17599
largefiles: restore caching of largefiles with 'clone -U --all-largefiles' This was broken when restoring normal -u and -U functionality.
Sat, 08 Sep 2012 13:31:06 -0400 largefiles: restore normal 'clone -u' and 'clone -U' functionality stable
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 08 Sep 2012 13:31:06 -0400] rev 17598
largefiles: restore normal 'clone -u' and 'clone -U' functionality Previously, tip would be checked out regardless of the -u or -U parameter. I'm not sure what the 'required for successful walkchangerevs' comment meant, but it appears to reference code which has since moved to downloadlfiles() in 7d6a660ca151. Perhaps it was to force caching when the -U parameter is given? The price of this change is that -U --all-largefiles won't cache anything. That will be fixed next. Note that X + Y in the 'X largefiles updated, n removed' and 'Y additional largefiles cached' lines do not add up to the same values in these tests, but all of the largefiles have been downloaded. The reason being that several largefiles have the same content (eb7338044 is pointed to by sub/large2, large3 and sub/large4). In the 'clone -u 1' operation, this largefile is cached to populate the working directory, even without --all-largefiles. That means the file isn't downloaded again and cached in the rev where large3 and sub/large4 both point to this file. Downloading that one file in that one rev seems to be counted twice with 'clone -u 0'. (Maybe it is also being downloaded twice?)
Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:50:34 -0400 formatter: add base implementation of data method
David M. Carr <david@carrclan.us> [Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:50:34 -0400] rev 17597
formatter: add base implementation of data method Previously, nothing was done with the passed in values, which clearly wasn't the intention.
Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:36:58 +0200 merge with stable
Thomas Arendsen Hein <thomas@intevation.de> [Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:36:58 +0200] rev 17596
merge with stable
Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:30:22 +0200 merge with main
Thomas Arendsen Hein <thomas@intevation.de> [Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:30:22 +0200] rev 17595
merge with main
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip