Mon, 08 Jan 2024 15:11:34 +0100 branchcache: unconditionally write delayed branchmap
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 08 Jan 2024 15:11:34 +0100] rev 51457
branchcache: unconditionally write delayed branchmap
Sun, 25 Feb 2024 16:14:15 +0100 branchcache: drop the unused `_verifyclosed`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 25 Feb 2024 16:14:15 +0100] rev 51456
branchcache: drop the unused `_verifyclosed` This code appears dead since its introduction about 5 years ago in this three consecutive commits: - 6578654916ae → introduce the method with two calls - 7c9d4cf23adf → remove first call - be5eeaf5c24a → remove second call o changeset: be5eeaf5c24a | user: Pulkit Goyal <pulkit@yandex-team.ru> | date: Fri Apr 05 15:57:09 2019 +0300 | summary: branchcache: don't verify closed nodes in _branchtip() | o changeset: 7c9d4cf23adf | user: Pulkit Goyal <pulkit@yandex-team.ru> | date: Fri Apr 05 15:56:33 2019 +0300 | summary: branchcache: don't verify closed nodes in iteropen() | o changeset: 6578654916ae | user: Pulkit Goyal <pulkit@yandex-team.ru> ~ date: Mon Apr 01 13:56:47 2019 +0300 summary: branchcache: lazily validate nodes from the branchmap
Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:46:24 +0100 branchcache: dispatch the code into the dedicated subclass
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:46:24 +0100] rev 51455
branchcache: dispatch the code into the dedicated subclass The code useful only to the local brancache have now been moved into the dedicated subclass. This will help improving the branchcache code without subtle breaking the remote variants.
Sun, 25 Feb 2024 14:09:36 +0100 branchcache: introduce a base class for branchmap
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 25 Feb 2024 14:09:36 +0100] rev 51454
branchcache: introduce a base class for branchmap This will help define a clear boundary between the two.
Mon, 19 Feb 2024 12:09:06 +0100 branchcache: fix the copy code
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 19 Feb 2024 12:09:06 +0100] rev 51453
branchcache: fix the copy code We copy some internal attribute along too. This should prevent inconsistency in the resulting branchmap.
Mon, 19 Feb 2024 13:11:42 +0100 branchcache: pass a "verify_node" attribut to __init__ instead of hasnode
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 19 Feb 2024 13:11:42 +0100] rev 51452
branchcache: pass a "verify_node" attribut to __init__ instead of hasnode The hasnode callback cannot be inherited and is dropped on copy, which seems like a bad idea. Instead we pass the actual semantic as a parameter and let the internal logic deal with it.
Mon, 19 Feb 2024 11:59:56 +0100 branchcache: stop storing a repository instance on the cache altogether
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 19 Feb 2024 11:59:56 +0100] rev 51451
branchcache: stop storing a repository instance on the cache altogether We did not really needed it and we do not needs it anymore at all. So lets make things simpler for consistency and garbage collecting and stop storing it altogether.
Mon, 19 Feb 2024 11:43:19 +0100 branchcache: pass the target repository when copying
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 19 Feb 2024 11:43:19 +0100] rev 51450
branchcache: pass the target repository when copying Branchmap are usually copied to be used on a different repoview using a different filter level. Passing the repository around means the repository in `branchcache._repo` will drift from the actual branchmap filter. This is currently "fine" because the repo is only used to retrieve the `nullid` value. However, this is a fairly big trap for any extension or future code using the `_repo` attribute. The replace logic is now using a copy to ensure the right repository view is used to initialized the cached value. We add a couple of assert for make sure this inconsistency does not sneak back.
Fri, 19 Jan 2024 11:30:10 +0100 branchcache: have an explicit method to update the on disk cache
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 19 Jan 2024 11:30:10 +0100] rev 51449
branchcache: have an explicit method to update the on disk cache Explicit is better and will give use more flexibility for future evolution of the storage.
Thu, 29 Feb 2024 14:13:21 -0800 crecord: drop calls to `curses.endwin()` stable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 29 Feb 2024 14:13:21 -0800] rev 51448
crecord: drop calls to `curses.endwin()` We got a bug report where `curses.endwin()` failed with `_curses.error: endwin() returned ERR`. Looking at e306d552dfb12, it seems like we should be able to just remove these calls.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 tip