Sat, 06 Jul 2013 21:48:01 +0200 tests: rename files to py extension instead of copying a 2nd time
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Sat, 06 Jul 2013 21:48:01 +0200] rev 19385
tests: rename files to py extension instead of copying a 2nd time
Sat, 06 Jul 2013 21:47:56 +0200 tests: check-code all python files in one run
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Sat, 06 Jul 2013 21:47:56 +0200] rev 19384
tests: check-code all python files in one run
Thu, 04 Jul 2013 23:05:59 +0900 win32mbcs: wrap util.split()
Shun-ichi GOTO <shunichi.goto@gmail.com> [Thu, 04 Jul 2013 23:05:59 +0900] rev 19383
win32mbcs: wrap util.split() util.split() should be wrapped because it is an alias of unsafe os.path.split().
Mon, 01 Jul 2013 06:50:58 +0200 check-code: concatenate "check-code" on compile time
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Mon, 01 Jul 2013 06:50:58 +0200] rev 19382
check-code: concatenate "check-code" on compile time The python compiler concatenates two string constants. Use this instead of doing it on run time or instruct the user how to do it. The strings "no-check-code" and "check-code-ignore" has to be specially written for not skipping some checking of the code of this file.
Mon, 01 Jul 2013 06:50:58 +0200 tests: do not skip code-checking on some whole files
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Mon, 01 Jul 2013 06:50:58 +0200] rev 19381
tests: do not skip code-checking on some whole files In filterpyflakes the term no-check-code was probably by accident. In the test the intention was not to skip the entire file but only one line. But any skipping seems to be unnecessary since a longer time.
Mon, 01 Jul 2013 06:50:58 +0200 check-code: do not warn on printf \\x or \\[1-9]
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Mon, 01 Jul 2013 06:50:58 +0200] rev 19380
check-code: do not warn on printf \\x or \\[1-9] When there is a double backslash the following char does not have any special meaning. So do not warn on this. Remove the now obsolete no-check-code statement. (It was used wrongly anyway, it skipped checking the entire file.)
Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:22:56 +0100 summary: remove passing of rev because summary does not have this
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:22:56 +0100] rev 19379
summary: remove passing of rev because summary does not have this The command summary does not have a rev argument, so passing this results is None always. Therefore pass None explicitly.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -7 +7 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip