revlog: move the "index header" struct inside revlog.utils.constants The struct was previous called "version", but this is actually "version" + "flags". So header seems like a better name. The move to the `constants` module has the same motivation as the INDEX_ENTRY_V# ones. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10306

revlog: move the details of revlog "v2" index inside revlog.utils.constants the revlog module is quite large and this kind of format information would handy for other module. So let us start to gather this information about the format in a more appropriate place. We update various reference to this information to use the new "source of truth" in the process. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10305

revlog: move the details of revlog "v1" index inside revlog.utils.constants The revlog module is quite large and this kind of format information would handy for other module. So let us start to gather this information about the format in a more appropriate place. We update various reference to this information to use the new "source of truth" in the process. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10304

revlog: move the details of revlog "v0" index inside revlog.utils.constants the revlog module is quite large and this kind of format information would handy for other module. So let us start to gather this information about the format in a more appropriate place. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10303

revlog: add some comment in the header sections We are about to add more content so let us organise the existing content first. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10302

store: drop the `filefilter` argument to `_walk` No code use it anywhere. Dropping it will help replacing the function with something with a more precise semantic. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10314

store: document the `walk` method Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10313

revlog: fix error about unknown compression format in py3 In py2, the error is something like: abort: unknown compression type 'x'! In py3, we get the following unhelpful message: abort: unknown compression type <memory at 0x7f4650b5cdc8>! Switch to something like: abort: unknown compression type 78! Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10318

revlog-compression: fix computation of engine availability We don't just need the engine to be define, we need it to be available and able to do be used for revlog compression. Without this change, `zstd` could be selected as a viable option for repository creation on platform where it is not available. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10325

test: explicitly use zlib compression in tests/test-share-safe.t We need the implicit value to be explicit until we can change the default in some case. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10323

test: explicitly use zlib compression in tests/test-upgrade-repo.t We need the implicit value to be explicit until we can change the default in some case. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10322

test: explicitly use zlib compression in tests/test-repo-compengines.t We need the implicit value to be explicit until we can change the default in some case. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10321

remotefilelog: include file contents in bundles produced during strip `hg strip` and other things that use repair.strip (such as the narrow extension's `hg tracked --removeinclude`) will "save" some commits that have a higher revision number than the oldest commit we're stripping, but aren't actually descended from any of the commits that we're stripping. It saves them in a bundle, and then reapplies them to the repo. Remotefilelog doesn't generally participate in strip, it doesn't contribute files to either the backup bundle or the "saved" bundle, and doesn't adjust linknodes when commits are stripped. This can break things like push, which rely on the linknodes. This change makes it so that remotefilelog includes files in these bundles during strip operations. During reapplication, the files are reapplied from the bundle, and the linknode is properly updated. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10320

tests: add test-remotefilelog-strip.t to demonstrate an issue with linknodes ### Background Every time a commit is modified, remotefilelog updates the metadata for the file object to point to the new commit (I believe that this is different from non-remotefilelog hg, which leaves the linkrevs pointing to the obsolete commits; doing otherwise would involve changing data in the middle of revlogs). With `hg strip` (or other things that use repair.strip()), when you strip a commit that's not the tip of the revlog, there may be commits after it in revnum order that aren't descended from it and don't need to be (and shouldn't be) stripped. These are "saved" by strip in a bundle, and that bundle is reapplied after truncating the relevant revlogs. ### The problem Remotefilelog generally avoids being involved at all in strip. Currently, that includes even providing file contents to this backup bundle. This can cause the linknode to point to a changeset that is no longer in the repository. Example: ``` @ 3 df91f74b871e | | x 2 70494d7ec5ef |/ | x 1 1e423846dde0 |/ o 0 b292c1e3311f ``` Commits 1, 2, and 3 are related via obsolescence, and are description-only changes. The linknode for the file in these commits changed each time we updated the description, so it's currently df91f7. If I strip commits 1 and 3, however, the linknode *remains* df91f7, which no longer exists in the repository. Commit 70494d was "saved", stripped, and then reapplied, so it is in the repository (as revision 1 instead of 2 now), and was unobsoleted since the obsmarker was stripped as well. The linknode for the file should point to 70494d, the most recent commit that is in the repository that modified the file. Remotefilelog has some logic to handle broken linknodes, but it can be slow. We have actually disabled it internally because it's too slow for our purposes. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10319

mergestate: remove unused import Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10291

deb: avoid use of [[ in 'rules' file It's not supported by posix shell, and apparently my build system uses that. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10292

refactor: prefer checks against nullrev over nullid A common pattern is using a changeset context and obtaining the node to compare against nullid. Change this to obtain the nullrev instead. In the future, the nullid becomes a property of the repository and is no longer a global constant, so using nullrev is much easier to reason about. Python function call overhead makes the difference moot, but future changes will result in more dictionary lookups otherwise, so prefer the simpler pattern. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10290

refactor: prefer lookup by revision, even for null While the nullid lookup is a special case, it is still more complicated. The common pattern is to lookup via nullrev so be consistent here. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10280

setdiscovery: simplify by using tiprev directly tip() uses tiprev() and reads the node from it, so drop a layer of indirection. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10289

test: enforce master to be the default branch in test Newer git issue a message about this. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10281

fix: merge imports Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10277

tests: update divergence test for `hg fix` to actually result in divergence We have a test that checks that `hg fix` errors out if it might cause divergence. However, the test simply prunes the commit it then tries to fix, so fixing it wouldn't actually cause divergence. That works because the implementation is simple enough that it doesn't notice the difference. I'm about to make the implementation smarter, so let's fix the test first. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10267

rebase: don't call rewriteutil.precheck() with to-be-skipped commits It's clearly incorrect to call `rewriteutil.precheck()` for commits that we're not about to rewrite. We haven't noticed yet because the function doesn't check for divergence, but I'm about to teach it to do that. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10259

reabase: call rewriteutil.precheck() a bit later We now filter out descendants of divergence-causing commits in `_handleskippingobsolete()`. The filtered-out commits are removed from the rebase set (`destmap` and `state`). We should therefore call `rewriteutil.precheck()` after `_handleskippingobsolete()`. This patch does that. It hasn't mattered so far because `rewriteutil.precheck()` doesn't yet check for divergence, but it will soon. This affects one test where we now fail because the user is trying to rebase an ancestor instead of failing because they tried to rebase a public commit. We have several similar tests just after, where we still fail because of the phase, so that seems fine. The difference in behavior also seems fine to me. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10258

rebase: set `prepared = True` at very end of `_preparenewrebase()` Once we've set `rebaseruntime.prepared = True`, `rebaseruntime.repo` starts returning the unfiltered repo. That will make my next patch break, because that patch moves the call to `rewriteutil.precheck()` after the call to `_handleskippingobsolete()`, which current happens after `prepared = True`. We therefore need to prepare by moving `prepared = True` a bit later, after `_handleskippingobsolete()`. I don't think that matters for that call. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10257

rebase: filter out descendants of divergence-causing commits earlier `hg rebase` treats obsolete commits differently depending what has happened to the commit: 1) Obsolete commit without non-obsolete successors: Skipped, and a note is printed ("it has no successor"). 2) Obsolete commit with a successor in the destination (ancestor of it): Skipped, and a note is printed ("already in destination"). 3) Obsolete commit with a successor in the rebase set: The commit and its descendants are skipped, and a note is printed ("not rebasing <commit> and its descendants as this would cause divergence"), unless `allowdivergence` config set. 4) Obsolete commit with a successor elsewhere: Error ("this rebase will cause divergences"), unless `allowdivergence` config set. Before this patch, we did all those checks up front, except for (3), which was checked later. The later check consisted of two parts: 1) filtering out of descendants, and 2) conditionally printing message if the `allowdivergence` config was not set. This patch makes it so we do the filtering early. A consequence of filtering out divergence-causing commits earlier is that we rebase commits in slightly different order, which has some impact on tests. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10249

rebase: clarify names of variables and function related to obsolete revisions Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10248

rebase: calculate obsolescense-related info earlier My goal is to use `rewriteutil.precheck()` in the rebase code. Since rebase does its own handling of divergent commits (it skips them instead of erroring out), we need to have divergence-causing commits filtered out early. This patch helps prepare for that. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10247

rebase: let _handleskippingobsolete(self) read directly from self The function already has `self` as an argument, so there's no need to pass data from `self` into it. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10246

tests: test divergence created during interrupted rebase If a rebase runs into conflicts and the user somehow rewrites an unrebased commit in the rebase set while the rebase is interrupted, continuing it might result in divergence. It turns out that we decide to skip the commit. That seems to make sense, but it wasn't obvious to me that that's what we should do. Either way, this patch adds a test case for the current behavior. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10256

tests: split up test-rebase-obsolete.t in four pieces The test case took 42 seconds to run the test before this patch and 12 seconds after (wall time, of course). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10255

path: error out if the `path://` reference point to an unknown path Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10265

path: forbid chaining `path://` definitions To have `path://xxx` referencing paths that use `path://` too, we need to analyze dependencies to initialize them in the right order (and to detect cycle). I don't want to deal with that right now, so I just disallow it for now. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10264

path: introduce a `path://` syntax to reference other path name This make it easier for a path to reuse the same location of another path with different parameter. This is useful to create path "alias" with common config option. This will become very useful to create path that reference a list of other path. This changeset focus on implemented the basic feature, future changesets will deal with various error management (and associated testing). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10263

path: extract sub-option logic into its own method We will need to re-use this logic for `path://` so we first extract it into its own method. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10262

path: extract the path validation logic into its own submethod We will need to re-use this logic for `path://` so we first extract it into its own method. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10261

path: move handling of "default" (*) suboptions value inside __init__ With the introduction of `path://` scheme the handling of default value will need to be subtler. We do simple code movement first to clarify the future changes. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10260

rhg: Initial support for the 'status' command Only comparing the working directory with its first parent revision is supported. The core logic of dirstate handling and `stat`’ing files was already in `hg-core` supporting Python-based hg with Rust extensions, so this is mostly plumbing to rhg’s CLI. For now the command is experimental and disabled by default, since it has some bugs that causes a number of tests to fail. These failures can be seen with: tests/run-tests.py --rhg --extra-config-opt rhg.status=true Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10239

rhg: raise wdir specific error for `hg debugdata` Helps remove the conditional in `test-debugcommands.t` for rhg. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10254

rhg: add support for detailed exit code for ConfigParseError This patch adds basic support for detailed exit code to rhg with support for ConfigParseError. For now, if parsing the config results in error, we silently fallbacks to `false`. The python version in this case emits a traceback. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10253

contributor: change mentions of mpm to olivia Matt Mackall is now Olivia Mackall. I reached out to her about changing the copyright notices to reflect this change and she gave me the green light, so I changed everything relevant. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10266

fuzz: use Python 3 in makefile As in the previous patch, I copied the snippet defining `PYTHON` from the root Makefile. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10252

makefile: use Python 3 by default when building docs as well I copied the snippet defining `PYTHON` from the root Makefile. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10251

tests: replace some `python` by `"$PYTHON"` to not only use Python 2 I deleted my `python` binary as a test and a few tests started failing. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10250

copies: distinguish between merged and touched files during upgrade This a filenode being different between p1, p2 and result does not necessarily means a merges happens. For example p2 could be a strict newer version of p1, so the p2 version is picked by the manifest merging, but then the file is manually updated before the commit. In this case the file should be detected as touched. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10220

copies: detect files as `touched/salvaged` if they only existed on one side The file cannot be merged if there was content to merge on the other side. So the previous record was wrong. In the general case, the file existed only on one side and got touched during the merge. So it should detected as touched. They are a special case where the merge manually prevent the file to be deleted. In this case the file is marked as `salvaged`. The result of this `salvaged` recording, copy-tracing-wise, is the same as recording it as `merged`. This is probably why they were recorded as `merged` in the first place. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10219

test-copies: add a test updating file content while salvaging it A deleted file is brought back during a merge. Its content is changed in the same go. This reveal some issue with the upgrade code. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10088

test-copies: show some wrong ChangedFiles upgrade For file present only on one side and touched during merge, the upgrade code confused them as "merged". However they should be either "touched", or "salvaged" but they are currently recorded as "merged". See the next changesets for more details on these cases and fix. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10218