Patrick Mezard <pmezard@gmail.com> [Fri, 27 May 2011 21:50:09 +0200] rev 14451
patch: refactor file creation/removal detection
The patcher has to know if a file is being created or removed to check if the
target already exists, or to actually unlink the file when a hunk emptying it
is applied. This was done by embedding the creation/removal information in the
first (and only) hunk attached to the file.
There are two problems with this approach:
- creation/removal is really a property of the file being patched and not its
hunk.
- for regular patches, file creation cannot be deduced at parsing time: there
are case where the *stripped* file paths must be compared. Modifying hunks
after their creation is clumsy and prevent further refactorings related to
copies handling.
Instead, we delegate this job to selectfile() which has all the relevant
information, and remove the hunk createfile() and rmfile() methods.
Adrian Buehlmann <adrian@cadifra.com> [Fri, 27 May 2011 15:59:52 +0200] rev 14450
commands.remove: don't use workingctx.remove(list, unlink=True)
workingctx.remove(list, unlink=True) is unsuited here, because it does too
much: it also unlinks added files. But the command 'hg remove' is specified
to *never* unlink added files.
Instead, we now unlink the files at the commands.remove level (if --after was
not specified) and use workingctx.forget for all files.
As an added bonus, this happens to eliminate a wlock acquire/release pair,
since the previous implementation caused
acquire wlock
release wlock
acquire wlock
release wlock
where the first pair of acquire/release was caused by the workingctx.forget
call, and the second by the workingctx.remove call.
Idan Kamara <idankk86@gmail.com> [Fri, 27 May 2011 17:51:16 +0300] rev 14449
tests: add a test to check for duplicate command options