Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:51:02 -0500 exthelper: add some examples for using registrar aliases
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:51:02 -0500] rev 41071
exthelper: add some examples for using registrar aliases Maybe it's my general lack of python knowledge, but how to use these would be way too obscure for me otherwise.
Thu, 27 Dec 2018 23:46:35 -0500 exthelper: reintroduce the ability to register filesets
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 27 Dec 2018 23:46:35 -0500] rev 41070
exthelper: reintroduce the ability to register filesets Same mechanism as revsets earlier in this series. The LFS extension is updated to provide test coverage.
Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:55:22 -0500 exthelper: reintroduce the ability to register templates
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:55:22 -0500] rev 41069
exthelper: reintroduce the ability to register templates Same mechanism as revsets earlier in this series. The LFS extension is updated to provide test coverage. This also seems to make the test failure around issue6033 mentioned in 0a7f582f6f1f much less regular on Windows.
Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:46:03 -0500 extensions: deprecate extsetup without a `ui` argument (API)
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:46:03 -0500] rev 41068
extensions: deprecate extsetup without a `ui` argument (API) 9.5 years should be enough time, but there were some tests for the old style still (which are now updated). Exthelper doesn't fallback to the old API, so this is for consistency. .. api:: The extension hook ``extsetup`` without a `ui` argument has been deprecated, and will be removed in the next version. Add a `ui` argument to avoid the deprecation warning.
Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:27:43 -0500 largefiles: port revset registration to exthelper
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:27:43 -0500] rev 41067
largefiles: port revset registration to exthelper This tests the merge code that wasn't tested in the previous patch.
Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:26:17 -0500 exthelper: reintroduce the ability to register revsets
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:26:17 -0500] rev 41066
exthelper: reintroduce the ability to register revsets I think this is what Yuya and Boris agreed on.[1] This happens *after* the extsetup phase now (and after the _aftercallback notifications). But this is trivial, mergeable between exthelper instances, and doesn't need to have the extension name supplied when registering. The test needed updating so that extsetup() takes a `ui` argument, as exthelper isn't trying to be backward compatible with 1.3.1. [1] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2018-December/125888.html
Sun, 23 Dec 2018 23:01:51 -0500 largefiles: drop the uisetup module
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 23 Dec 2018 23:01:51 -0500] rev 41065
largefiles: drop the uisetup module This is small enough to live in the __init__ module.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -7 +7 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip