Thu, 01 Dec 2022 01:34:26 +0100 path: directly use the push_variant in `hg push`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 01 Dec 2022 01:34:26 +0100] rev 49698
path: directly use the push_variant in `hg push` We don't need any extra processing now.
Thu, 01 Dec 2022 01:33:27 +0100 path: have `get_push_paths` directly return the push variants
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 01 Dec 2022 01:33:27 +0100] rev 49697
path: have `get_push_paths` directly return the push variants So the function directly returns usable paths, that should help the callers!
Thu, 01 Dec 2022 01:32:24 +0100 path: add a method to retrieve a "push variant" of a path
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 01 Dec 2022 01:32:24 +0100] rev 49696
path: add a method to retrieve a "push variant" of a path This gets you the same path, but using the `pushurl` as destination. This opens the way for a lot of different improvements, the one which interests us is having `peer` objects aware of the `path` they came from.
Thu, 01 Dec 2022 18:01:24 +0400 tests: use an all too familiar executable in test-run-tests.t (issue6661) stable
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Thu, 01 Dec 2022 18:01:24 +0400] rev 49695
tests: use an all too familiar executable in test-run-tests.t (issue6661) true(1) sometimes lives in /usr/bin/, and so this test fails on such systems. We also can't use which(1), because it's apparently not POSIX and Debian complains about it [1]. We also cannot really create a script and chmod +x it, because this is a symlink case, execbit case is slightly below. So let's use something that we know is executable, but not hg itself.
Thu, 01 Dec 2022 01:27:47 +0100 path: move the url parsing and related attribute setting to a method
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 01 Dec 2022 01:27:47 +0100] rev 49694
path: move the url parsing and related attribute setting to a method This will make it simpler to reuse this logic in the next changeset.
Tue, 29 Nov 2022 22:22:18 +0100 peer-or-repo: remove the now unused function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 29 Nov 2022 22:22:18 +0100] rev 49693
peer-or-repo: remove the now unused function We do not need it anymore.
Tue, 29 Nov 2022 22:21:19 +0100 peer-or-repo: build a repo directly in the `repo` function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 29 Nov 2022 22:21:19 +0100] rev 49692
peer-or-repo: build a repo directly in the `repo` function We skip the ambiguous _peerorrepo function to explicitly build a repo within the dedicated function. The peer scheme are therefore no longer considered to build the object.
Tue, 29 Nov 2022 22:04:23 +0100 peer-or-repo: build a peer directly in the `peer` function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 29 Nov 2022 22:04:23 +0100] rev 49691
peer-or-repo: build a peer directly in the `peer` function We skip the ambiguous _peerorrepo function to explicitly build a peer within the dedicated function. This mean explicitly getting a peer from an explicitly create repository when necessary.
Tue, 29 Nov 2022 22:03:10 +0100 static-http: have `statichttprepo.instance` return a peer object
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 29 Nov 2022 22:03:10 +0100] rev 49690
static-http: have `statichttprepo.instance` return a peer object It previously returned a statichttprepo object which could not be used for anything but creating a peer. So lets put it into the peer bucket with a peer behavior.
Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:22:02 +0100 scheme: move the drive letter checking in its own function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:22:02 +0100] rev 49689
scheme: move the drive letter checking in its own function This help the readability of the main function as is was taking much more room than the main logic.
Tue, 29 Nov 2022 21:48:08 +0100 peer-or-repo: split the scheme between repo and peer
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 29 Nov 2022 21:48:08 +0100] rev 49688
peer-or-repo: split the scheme between repo and peer Some of the scheme will always produce a peer and some will always produce a repository. So lets use different mapping to reduce the ambiguity.
Wed, 30 Nov 2022 13:55:15 +0100 peer-or-repo: stop relying on AttributeError in `islocal`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 30 Nov 2022 13:55:15 +0100] rev 49687
peer-or-repo: stop relying on AttributeError in `islocal` This will confused pytypes in a future changeset.
Tue, 29 Nov 2022 21:42:08 +0100 repo-or-peer: deprecate calling `islocal` on non-path object
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 29 Nov 2022 21:42:08 +0100] rev 49686
repo-or-peer: deprecate calling `islocal` on non-path object There object have a `.local()` method and should use it.
Thu, 01 Dec 2022 15:27:11 +0400 tests: add the missing space to test-hghave.t (issue6762) stable
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Thu, 01 Dec 2022 15:27:11 +0400] rev 49685
tests: add the missing space to test-hghave.t (issue6762) log() in run-tests.py add a space to the end of all messages that it prints, and I missed this fact in my previous patch.
Wed, 30 Nov 2022 11:12:48 +0100 share: stop using 'islocal' with repo instance
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 30 Nov 2022 11:12:48 +0100] rev 49684
share: stop using 'islocal' with repo instance Having this level of polymorphism of the `islocal` function is weird, and we already have a way to know if the repo is local from the object itself. We are about to deprecate passing a non-bytes object to `islocal`, so clean this up beforehand. We might want to clean up this function too in the future, however this is another adventure.
Tue, 29 Nov 2022 19:54:55 +0100 peer-or-repo: make sure object in "scheme" have a `instance` object
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 29 Nov 2022 19:54:55 +0100] rev 49683
peer-or-repo: make sure object in "scheme" have a `instance` object The previous form of having heterogeneous object in the dictionnary makes things more complicated than they needed to be. I am not super happy about the current (especially around 'islocal', that most item do not have), but this is already much better.
Tue, 29 Nov 2022 18:30:54 +0100 peer-or-repo: move the object setup in its own function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 29 Nov 2022 18:30:54 +0100] rev 49682
peer-or-repo: move the object setup in its own function The `_peerorrepo` function is problematic, because it can build different types of object (repository and peer). This make it hard to adjust the arguments to the type of object we needs. So this patch start a series of change to create peer and repo without going through a common function. We move the part of the function doing object setup it its own function to make it simpler to reuse in others contexts.
Sun, 06 Nov 2022 17:53:17 -0500 delta-find: use a single snapshot cache when applying a group to an object
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 06 Nov 2022 17:53:17 -0500] rev 49681
delta-find: use a single snapshot cache when applying a group to an object This will avoid walking the revlog over and over again in some situations. The difference is hard to show in our current benchmark suite, as the gain is lower than their overall instability.
Sun, 06 Nov 2022 17:55:55 -0500 delta-find: make sure we only use newer full snapshot as candidate
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 06 Nov 2022 17:55:55 -0500] rev 49680
delta-find: make sure we only use newer full snapshot as candidate The current code does not needs to protect against this, as there are no older snapshot in the current cache. However as we are getting ready to reuse this cache from one revision to another, we need the code to protect itself about what's coming.
Sun, 06 Nov 2022 17:55:46 -0500 delta-find: use sets instead of list in the snapshot cache
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 06 Nov 2022 17:55:46 -0500] rev 49679
delta-find: use sets instead of list in the snapshot cache This seems more appropriate.
Sun, 06 Nov 2022 16:56:23 -0500 delta-find: use a smarter object for snapshot caching
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 06 Nov 2022 16:56:23 -0500] rev 49678
delta-find: use a smarter object for snapshot caching This open the way for a longer lived cache.
Mon, 07 Nov 2022 22:12:59 -0500 find-delta: pass the cache-delta usage policy alongside the cache-delta
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 07 Nov 2022 22:12:59 -0500] rev 49677
find-delta: pass the cache-delta usage policy alongside the cache-delta The idea is to give higher level code more control to what will happens with the cache delta passed. This should help with controling how we treat delta's from different sources. The final goal of this change is to allow for server modes where the client can blindly accept any server delta without regards to any local constraints. This will be implemented in later changesets.
Mon, 28 Nov 2022 18:58:35 +0100 find-delta: move most of the debug-find-delta code in the debug module
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 28 Nov 2022 18:58:35 +0100] rev 49676
find-delta: move most of the debug-find-delta code in the debug module Lets us that module more. It will help us to keep revlog implementation details close to each other.
Mon, 07 Nov 2022 20:02:32 -0500 find-delta: minor preparatory change
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 07 Nov 2022 20:02:32 -0500] rev 49675
find-delta: minor preparatory change We are about to add more item in the cachedelta object, so lets access the item by index instead of doing a full extensions.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -50 -24 +24 +50 +100 +300 +1000 tip