Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:48:57 +0800 monoblue: remove duplicate font-family property from td.source
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:48:57 +0800] rev 26022
monoblue: remove duplicate font-family property from td.source
Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:45:54 +0800 monoblue: remove unused elements and related css
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:45:54 +0800] rev 26021
monoblue: remove unused elements and related css Since 91b0ada2d94b and c9b88695d894, when monoblue was introduced, the code this patch removes was untouched. Presumably, there supposed to be nice graphics in the screen corners, but there never were due to: - the css being commented out - ids of the elements and of the css selectors being different - and the png files absent The "corner" elements were unstyled and didn't affect the rest of the page, so I think it's safe to remove all this.
Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:15:43 +0900 revpair: restrict odd-range handling to top-level x:y expression (issue4774)
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:15:43 +0900] rev 26020
revpair: restrict odd-range handling to top-level x:y expression (issue4774) The odd-range hack was introduced by 2a0efa1112ac for backward compatibility, but it was too widely applied. I've checked cmdutil.revpair() at 1.6, and found that ".:", ":0" and ":" are also handled as pairs. So let's enable the hack only for "x:y", "x:", "y:" and ":". test-revset.t is updated because "tip^::tip^ or tip^" shouldn't be taken as an odd range. This patch adds "tip^:tip^" instead. This patch is written for the default branch because parse() of the stable branch lacks compatibility hack for "foo+bar" tag. If we want to mitigate the issue in stable, we can add something like "and '::' in revs[0]".
Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:27:32 +0900 revpair: update test to make a difference if odd range not handled specially
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:27:32 +0900] rev 26019
revpair: update test to make a difference if odd range not handled specially It was added at 2a0efa1112ac, but there was no difference between -r2 and -r2:2 because the working directory was clean.
Thu, 13 Aug 2015 18:59:49 +0900 reachableroots: verify type of each item of heads argument
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Thu, 13 Aug 2015 18:59:49 +0900] rev 26018
reachableroots: verify type of each item of heads argument Though PyInt_AS_LONG() can return a value no matter if it isn't an int object, it could exceed the boundary of the underlying struct. I think C API should be defensive to such errors.
Thu, 13 Aug 2015 18:38:46 +0900 reachableroots: verify integer range of heads argument (issue4775)
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Thu, 13 Aug 2015 18:38:46 +0900] rev 26017
reachableroots: verify integer range of heads argument (issue4775) Now it raises IndexError instead of SEGV for 'wdir()' as it was before.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -6 +6 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip