Wed, 07 Feb 2018 20:19:06 -0800 wireproto: use maybecapturestdio() for push responses (API)
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 07 Feb 2018 20:19:06 -0800] rev 36067
wireproto: use maybecapturestdio() for push responses (API) The "pushres" and "pusherr" response types currently call proto.restore() in the HTTP protocol. This completes the pairing with proto.redirect() that occurs in the @wireprotocommand functions. (But since the SSH protocol has a no-op redirect(), it doesn't bother calling restore() because it would also be a no-op.) Having the disconnect between these paired calls is very confusing. Knowing that you must use proto.redirect() if returning a "pushres" or a "pusherr" is even wonkier. We replace this confusing code with our new context manager for [maybe] capturing output. The "pushres" and "pusherr" types have gained an "output" argument to their constructor and an attribute to hold captured data. The HTTP protocol now retrieves output from these objects. .. api:: ``wireproto.pushres`` and ``wireproto.pusherr`` now explicitly track stdio output. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2082
Wed, 07 Feb 2018 20:17:47 -0800 wireprotoserver: add context manager mechanism for redirecting stdio
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 07 Feb 2018 20:17:47 -0800] rev 36066
wireprotoserver: add context manager mechanism for redirecting stdio Today, proto.redirect() sets up redirecting stdio and proto.restore() undoes that. The API is a bit wonky because restore() is only implemented on the HTTP protocol. Furthermore, not all calls to redirect() are obviously paired with calls to restore(). For example, the call to restore() for "unbundle" requests is handled by the response handler for the HTTP protocol. This commit introduces a new method on the protocol handler interface to maybe capture stdio. It emits a file object or None depending on whether stdio capture is used by the transport. To prove it works, the "pushkey" wire protocol command has been updated to use the new API. I'm not convinced this is the best mechanism to capture stdio. I may need to come up with something better once the new wire protocol emerges into existence. But it is strictly better than before because it removes variance in the wire protocol handler interface. It therefore gets us closer to a unified interface between the SSH and HTTP transports. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2081
Wed, 07 Feb 2018 20:17:05 -0800 wireprotoserver: split ssh protocol handler and server
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 07 Feb 2018 20:17:05 -0800] rev 36065
wireprotoserver: split ssh protocol handler and server We want to formalize the interface for protocol handlers. Today, server functionality (which is domain specific) is interleaved with protocol handling functionality (which conforms to a generic interface) in the sshserver class. This commit splits the ssh protocol handling code out of the sshserver class. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2080
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -3 +3 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip