Wed, 05 Aug 2015 14:51:34 -0400 batching: migrate basic noop batching into peer.peer
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Wed, 05 Aug 2015 14:51:34 -0400] rev 25912
batching: migrate basic noop batching into peer.peer "Real" batching only makes sense for wirepeers, but it greatly simplifies the clients of peer instances if they can be ignorant to actual batching capabilities of that peer. By moving the not-really-batched batching code into peer.peer, all peer instances now work with the batching API, thus simplifying users. This leaves a couple of name forwards in wirepeer.py. Originally I had planned to clean those up, but it kind of unclarifies other bits of code that want to use batching, so I think it makes sense for the names to stay exposed by wireproto. Specifically, almost nothing is currently aware of peer (see largefiles.proto for an example), so making them be aware of the peer module *and* the wireproto module seems like some abstraction leakage. I *think* the right long-term fix would actually be to make wireproto an implementation detail that clients wouldn't need to know about, but I don't really know what that would entail at the moment. As far as I'm aware, no clients of batching in third-party extensions will need updating, which is nice icing.
Thu, 06 Aug 2015 22:54:28 -0700 parsers: fix memory leak in compute_phases_map_sets stable
Laurent Charignon <lcharignon@fb.com> [Thu, 06 Aug 2015 22:54:28 -0700] rev 25911
parsers: fix memory leak in compute_phases_map_sets PySet_Add increments the reference of the added object to the set, see: https://hg.python.org/cpython/file/2.6/Objects/setobject.c#l379 Before this patch we were forgetting to decrement the reference count after adding objects to the phaseset. This patch fixes the issue and makes the reference count right so that these objects can be properly garbage collected.
Mon, 03 Aug 2015 06:13:05 -0700 histedit: do not stay on a cleaned nodes on abort
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Mon, 03 Aug 2015 06:13:05 -0700] rev 25910
histedit: do not stay on a cleaned nodes on abort There is case where nodes are neither in tmpnodes nor leaf but still get removed. For example, if you used the "edit" action, made a commit and run --abort. The commit you made is not tracked by histedit, yet it will likely be cleaned up with its parent. The commit may not tracked because no replacements computations are done in the --abort case.
Mon, 03 Aug 2015 06:11:45 -0700 histedit: also update away from tmpnodes
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Mon, 03 Aug 2015 06:11:45 -0700] rev 25909
histedit: also update away from tmpnodes The working copy may be on a tmpnodes, we need to update away before it is stripped from the repository.
Mon, 03 Aug 2015 06:08:37 -0700 histedit: use revset to check if we need to update during abort
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Mon, 03 Aug 2015 06:08:37 -0700] rev 25908
histedit: use revset to check if we need to update during abort The for loop is already quite more complicated than necessary and we are about to add some logic. Instead, we use a simple revset. Revset laziness should provide us with similar performance.
Mon, 03 Aug 2015 05:57:45 -0700 histedit: remove useless 'else' clause
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Mon, 03 Aug 2015 05:57:45 -0700] rev 25907
histedit: remove useless 'else' clause This 'else: pass' clause have no effect. We drop it for clarity.
Fri, 31 Jul 2015 15:46:49 -0700 histedit: make cleanupnode more robust
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Fri, 31 Jul 2015 15:46:49 -0700] rev 25906
histedit: make cleanupnode more robust The goal of this function is to strip content out of the repository. We do not really care if this content is visible or cleanup node not and we should proceed anyway. None of the internal actions are subject to this, however, a third party extension running arbitrary commands during histedit is affected by this.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -7 +7 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip