Fri, 01 Feb 2019 15:51:02 +0100 upgrade: support upgrade to/from zstd storage (issue6088)
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 01 Feb 2019 15:51:02 +0100] rev 42137
upgrade: support upgrade to/from zstd storage (issue6088) Now that we have an official config option for a shiny format improvement, we better make it simple to migrate to/from it.
Wed, 27 Mar 2019 18:27:03 +0100 compression: introduce an official `zstd-revlog` requirement
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 27 Mar 2019 18:27:03 +0100] rev 42136
compression: introduce an official `zstd-revlog` requirement This requirement supersedes `exp-compression-zstd`. However, we keep support for the old requirement. Strictly speaking, we do not need to add a new requirement, there are no logic change making "new" repo incompatible with mercurial client using a version that support `exp-compression-zstd`. The choice to introduce a new requirement is motivated by the following: * The previous requirement was explicitly "experimental". Using it by default could confuse users. * adding support for a hypothetical third compression engine will requires new code, and will comes with its own requirement tool. * We won't use it as the default for a while since I do not think we support zstd on all platform. I can imagine we'll gain another (unrelated but on my default) requirement by the time we turn this zstd by default.
Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:10:16 +0200 compression: only declare revlog support for available engine
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:10:16 +0200] rev 42135
compression: only declare revlog support for available engine Even if we know that an engine support revlog compression, the Mercurial process still won't support it if the compression engine is not available.
Mon, 15 Apr 2019 19:21:41 +0300 branchcache: lazily validate nodes in iteritems()
Pulkit Goyal <pulkit@yandex-team.ru> [Mon, 15 Apr 2019 19:21:41 +0300] rev 42134
branchcache: lazily validate nodes in iteritems() This saves ~0.30 sec on creating a new branch on our internal repo. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6236
Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:01:33 +0300 branchcache: only iterate over branches which needs to be verified
Pulkit Goyal <pulkit@yandex-team.ru> [Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:01:33 +0300] rev 42133
branchcache: only iterate over branches which needs to be verified Otherwise we loop over all the branches and call _verifybranch() even if not required. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6240
Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:48:48 +0300 branchcache: fix the docstring of _verifybranch()
Pulkit Goyal <pulkit@yandex-team.ru> [Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:48:48 +0300] rev 42132
branchcache: fix the docstring of _verifybranch() Initially the function was designed to support verifying all branches but later I decided to have a separate function. I forget to remove the doc related to that. Thanks to Yuya for spotting this in review. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6239
Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:39:14 +0300 branchcache: don't verify while creating a copy
Pulkit Goyal <pulkit@yandex-team.ru> [Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:39:14 +0300] rev 42131
branchcache: don't verify while creating a copy The copy will not be mark as verified, so there is no need to verify nodes. Thanks to Yuya who spotted this while reviewing. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6238
Fri, 05 Apr 2019 14:35:33 +0200 pull: improved message issued in case of failed update
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 05 Apr 2019 14:35:33 +0200] rev 42130
pull: improved message issued in case of failed update When running `hg pull --update`, the update step may fail. Nothing in the error message help to understand the abort is related to the secondary step (update) instead of the primary step (pull). We now add some information to the error message to clarify it comes from the update part. It is useful in various situation (uncommitted changes blocking the update, update to hidden destination, etc...) The pull output is updated from: $ hg pull ../repo-Bob --rev 956063ac4557 --update pulling from ../repo-Bob searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 2 changesets with 0 changes to 2 files (+1 heads) (2 other changesets obsolete on arrival) abort: filtered revision '6'! to: $ hg pull ../repo-Bob --rev 956063ac4557 --update pulling from ../repo-Bob searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 2 changesets with 0 changes to 2 files (+1 heads) (2 other changesets obsolete on arrival) abort: cannot update to target: filtered revision '6'! (I am not sure why the actual error, "filtered revision '6'", is not using the more modern format mentioning the obsolescence fate of '6')
Fri, 05 Apr 2019 15:56:05 +0200 pull: deal with locally filtered changeset passed into --rev
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 05 Apr 2019 15:56:05 +0200] rev 42129
pull: deal with locally filtered changeset passed into --rev Nowadays, it is possible to explicitly pull a remote revision that end up being hidden locally (eg: obsoleted locally). However before this patch, some internal processing where crashing trying to resolve a filtered revision. Without this patches, the pull output result a confusing output: $ hg pull ../repo-Bob --rev 956063ac4557 pulling from ../repo-Bob searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 2 changesets with 0 changes to 2 files (+1 heads) (2 other changesets obsolete on arrival) abort: 00changelog.i@956063ac4557828781733b2d5677a351ce856f59: filtered node!
Mon, 15 Apr 2019 22:13:11 -0700 absorb: aborting if another operation is in progress
Rodrigo Damazio Bovendorp <rdamazio@google.com> [Mon, 15 Apr 2019 22:13:11 -0700] rev 42128
absorb: aborting if another operation is in progress This increases safety of using absorb by both aborting when another operation is in progress (since the absorption could confuse any other command a lot) and holding the locks throughout the reading of the working directory (for which changes to absorb) and the reading of the repo (for which changes to absorb into). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6237
Thu, 04 Apr 2019 13:58:49 +0200 repoview: keep the branchmap cache for the `served.hidden` view warm
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 04 Apr 2019 13:58:49 +0200] rev 42127
repoview: keep the branchmap cache for the `served.hidden` view warm For the same reason we want to keep the cache for the `served` view up to date, we want to also keep the `served.hidden` view up to date. If some processes with a readonly access to the repo needs to access it, we better have the cache warm to avoid computing the same data over and over and over. In most case (no secret changesets), the "served" and "served.hidden" set will be identical and no cache will actually have to be updated.
Mon, 21 May 2018 17:28:35 +0200 repoview: introduce a filter for serving hidden changesets
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 21 May 2018 17:28:35 +0200] rev 42126
repoview: introduce a filter for serving hidden changesets There are multiple usecase for being able to explicitly view or pull obsolete from a server. We need to be able to do so without exposing the secret changesets. We introduces a dedicated repository "view" to do so. Way to expose this "view" to the user will come later. To keep a behavior consistent with expected client/server behavior, the general idea is for the obsolete access to be explicitly requested by the code generating the request. In addition, the will be server side configuration to restrict the access to this feature.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -12 +12 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip