Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Mon, 03 Apr 2023 16:03:41 +0200] rev 50417
rustdoc: summary line for hg_path_to_os_string
The main motivation of this change is to avoid the TODO being
the summary line, even though this leads to a pretty obvious summary.
Then doc-comments for the other functions are introduced for
consistency.
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Mon, 03 Apr 2023 15:58:36 +0200] rev 50416
rustdoc: wording for checkexec
Notably separating the summary line for correct display
at module level.
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Mon, 03 Apr 2023 15:32:39 +0200] rev 50415
rustdoc: fixed warnings about links
This is the minimal fix making those that actually were supposed
to be links to work (including in private items).
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:21:38 +0200] rev 50414
rust-changelog: introduce ChangelogEntry parent entries accessors
Straightforwards now that lifetimes are explicit in `RevlogEntry`
parent accessors.
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:20:53 +0200] rev 50413
rust-revlog: fix lifetime problem for RevlogEntry parent entries accessors
Without this, the lifetime of the result is equated to the lifetime of the
`self` reference, preventing callers, e.g., to take a `RevlogEntry` and
return its `p1_entry()`, as it looks like returning something that does not
outlive the *reference to* the `RevlogEntry`.
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:14:57 +0200] rev 50412
rust-revlog: explicit naming for `RevlogEntry` lifetime
This matches what has been done in `revlog::changelog::ChangelogRevisionData`,
and has the advantage of making things clearer when we introduce other, shorter
lived lifetimes.
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Wed, 29 Mar 2023 20:50:42 +0200] rev 50411
rust-changelog: introducing an intermediate `ChangelogEntry`
Before this change, client code needing to extract, e.g, the Node ID and the
description from a changeset had no other choice than calling both
`entry_for_rev()` and `data_for_rev()`. This duplicates some (limited) computation, and
more importantly imposes bad hygiene for client code: at some point of developement,
the client code would have to pass over both entry and data in its internal layers,
which at some point of development would raise the question whether they are consistent.
We introduce the intermediate `ChangelogEntry` from which both conversion to the generic
`RevlogEntry` and extraction of `ChangelogRevisionData` are possible.
It might grow some convenience methods in the future.
We keep the `data_for_rev()` method of `Changelog` for compatibility, pointing users at the more
powerful alternative.
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Wed, 29 Mar 2023 21:03:39 +0200] rev 50410
rust-changelog: added a test for `NULL_REVISION` special case
The result is due to `Revlog.get_rev_data()` returning an empty
byte string for `NULL_REVISION`, followed by special case for
emtpty byte strings in `ChangelogRevisionData::new()`.
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Wed, 29 Mar 2023 20:24:58 +0200] rev 50409
rust-changelog: made doc-comments more consistent
The most important is the one about `data_for_rev`, that looked like
a copy-paste leftover (got me confused first time I read this code, before
I actually learned there were both `Entry` and RevisionData`.
In the comment for the `struct`, "changelog" was probably more about
the format in general (as documented elsewhere) than as an identifier.
Some of the "Return something" had "of", half had "for".
Jason R. Coombs <jaraco@jaraco.com> [Tue, 21 Mar 2023 20:47:30 -0400] rev 50408
extras: re-use Projection from jaraco.collections