Sun, 07 Aug 2016 17:48:52 +0900 revset: add stub to handle parentpost operation
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 07 Aug 2016 17:48:52 +0900] rev 29931
revset: add stub to handle parentpost operation All operations will take 'order' flag, but p1() function won't.
Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:02:16 +0900 revset: infer ordering flag to teach if operation should define/follow order
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:02:16 +0900] rev 29930
revset: infer ordering flag to teach if operation should define/follow order New flag 'order' is the hint to determine if a function or operation can enforce its ordering requirement or take the ordering already defined. It will be used to fix a couple of ordering bugs, such as: a) 'x & (y | z)' disregards the order of 'x' (issue5100) b) 'x & y:z' is listed from 'y' to 'z' c) 'x & y' can be rewritten as 'y & x' if weight(x) > weight(y) (a) and (b) are bugs of the revset core. Before this, there was no way to tell if 'orset()' and 'rangeset()' can enforce its ordering. These bugs could be addressed by overriding __and__() of the initial set to take the ordering of the other set: class fullreposet: def __and__(self, other): # allow other to enforce its ordering return other but it would expose (c), which is a hidden bug of optimize(). So, in either ways, optimize() have to know the current ordering requirement. Otherwise, it couldn't rewrite expressions by weights with no output change, nor tell how a revset function or operation should order the entries. 'order' is tri-state. It starts with 'define', and shifts to 'follow' by 'x & y'. It changes back to 'define' on function call 'f(x)' or function-like operation 'x (f) y' because 'f' may have its own ordering requirement for 'x' and 'y'. The state 'any' will allow us to avoid extra cost that would be necessary to constrain ordering where it isn't important, 'not x'.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -2 +2 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip