Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 22:17:34 -0700] rev 39894
repo: look up nullrev context by revnum, not symbolic name
I think lookup of the 'null' symbol should be done via
scmutil.revsymbol() and repo['null'] is only supported for historical
reasons. However, repo[nullrev] is fine, so we can switch to that
instead of switching to scmutil.revsymbol('null').
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4780
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 22:17:26 -0700] rev 39893
bundle: consistently put revnums in "base" collection
The "base" collection contains revnums, except that it can also
contain the "null" symbol. That's a little weird. Let's be consistent.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4779
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 27 Sep 2018 22:07:12 -0400] rev 39892
py3: ensure printing to stdout uses str in test-hgweb-no-request-uri.t
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 27 Sep 2018 13:57:50 -0700] rev 39891
scmutil: accept multiple predecessors in 'replacements' (API)
This changeset makes 'cleanupnodes' accepts multiple predecessors as
`replacements` keys. The same as it accepts multiple successors as
`replacements` values. To avoid breaking all callers, the old and new ways are
currently valid at the same time. We'll deprecate and drop the old way later.
This change is the first step toward a better tracking of "fold" event in the
evolution history. While working on the "rewind" command (in the evolve
extension), we realized that first class tracking of folds are necessary.
We already have good tracking of splits. When walking the evolution history
from predecessors to successors, that makes for a clear distinction between
having multiple successors because of the actual splitting of a changeset or
content-divergences.
The "rewind" command allows restoring older evolution of a stack of
changesets. One of its mode walks the evolution history to automatically find
appropriate predecessors. This means walking from successors to predecessors.
In this case, we need to be able to make the same distinction between an
actual fold and other cases. So we will have to track folds explicitly.
This changesets only focus on making it possible to express fold at the
`cleanupnodes` API level. The actual tracking will be implemented later.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 27 Sep 2018 13:54:37 -0700] rev 39890
scmutil: expand long "one-liner"
When a one-liner gets 3 lines longs, it loses its expressivity benefits. We
expand it into a simple for loop. This makes future changes of the code in
that area clearer.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:47:05 +0200] rev 39889
shelve: find shelvedctx from bundle even if they are already in the repo
We use the new "duplicates" node tracking to find the tip of the bundle even if
it already exists in the repository.
Such logic is not supposed to be needed in theory. If the shelve was made using
internal-phase, we already know its node. Otherwise, the bundle content should
have been stripped. However, handling it makes the shelve code more robust and
provide a good example of "revduplicates" usage.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:19:28 +0200] rev 39888
shelve: return the shelved node as part of bundle application
It make sense to have the function in charge of unbundling the shelved revision
also return the node of that revision (when the data is in the bundle).
This will help us to handle unnatural state where the unshelved change already
exists in the repository.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:18:28 +0200] rev 39887
changelog: keep track of duplicated node in the transaction adding them
The transaction is already tracking the new nodes. We now tracks the
"duplicates" in the same location.