Fri, 03 Mar 2017 13:52:08 -0500 py3: add a test that proves %include and missing-extension code works
Augie Fackler <raf@durin42.com> [Fri, 03 Mar 2017 13:52:08 -0500] rev 31304
py3: add a test that proves %include and missing-extension code works
Fri, 03 Mar 2017 14:08:02 -0500 extensions: tapdance to get reasonable import error formatting
Augie Fackler <raf@durin42.com> [Fri, 03 Mar 2017 14:08:02 -0500] rev 31303
extensions: tapdance to get reasonable import error formatting I'm not thrilled with this, but it seems to work.
Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:35:44 -0800 rebase: abort if *any* commit in rebase set is public
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:35:44 -0800] rev 31302
rebase: abort if *any* commit in rebase set is public
Sat, 11 Mar 2017 13:53:14 -0500 merge with stable
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Sat, 11 Mar 2017 13:53:14 -0500] rev 31301
merge with stable
Thu, 09 Mar 2017 20:53:14 -0800 httpconnection: rename config to groups
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Thu, 09 Mar 2017 20:53:14 -0800] rev 31300
httpconnection: rename config to groups Because that is what it is.
Thu, 09 Mar 2017 20:51:57 -0800 httpconnection: don't use dict()
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Thu, 09 Mar 2017 20:51:57 -0800] rev 31299
httpconnection: don't use dict() Not sure the history here. But we don't do this elsewhere.
Thu, 09 Mar 2017 15:38:00 -0800 formatter: set _first on formatter, not ui
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 09 Mar 2017 15:38:00 -0800] rev 31298
formatter: set _first on formatter, not ui The _first field is used for tracking when to emit a separator between items. It seems like it's clearly formatter state, not ui state, so let's move it there.
Fri, 10 Mar 2017 23:07:20 -0800 rebase: unhide original working directory node as well (issue5219)
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 10 Mar 2017 23:07:20 -0800] rev 31297
rebase: unhide original working directory node as well (issue5219) By including the working directory revision at the start of rebase in the repo._rebaseset, we make sure it's not hidden when we update back to it at the end of the rebase. This feels like abusing the set a bit given its name (_rebaseset), but I couldn't think of another name that's clearly better.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -8 +8 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip