Thu, 29 Mar 2018 21:29:15 -0700 context: avoid using a context object as a changeid
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 29 Mar 2018 21:29:15 -0700] rev 37172
context: avoid using a context object as a changeid I find it misleading to pass changeid=changectx. It currently works to do that because there's weird (IMO) handling of it in basectx.__new__. I'm planning on removing that code. Passing changeid as "changeid" and context as "context" makes it more readable. Note that the documentation of filectx.__init__ doesn't even seem to be aware that a changeid can be a context ("changeset revision, node, or tag"). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2967
Thu, 29 Mar 2018 21:15:40 -0700 context: remove unwanted assignments in basectx.__new__() (API)
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 29 Mar 2018 21:15:40 -0700] rev 37171
context: remove unwanted assignments in basectx.__new__() (API) The two subclasses in core apparently didn't trust __new__() to do the job anyway (they both reassigned all the properties after). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2966
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -2 +2 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip