Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Fri, 04 Apr 2014 16:41:51 -0700] rev 20956
exchange: pass bundlecaps through to changegroup
The bundlecaps passed to exchange.getbundle were being dropped completely. We
should pass them on through to the changegroup.
This affected the remotefilelog extension, since it relies on those bundlecaps.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 23:41:32 -0700] rev 20955
bundle2: allow pulling changegroups using bundle2
This changeset refactors the pull code to use a bundle2 when available. We keep
bundle2 disabled by default. The current code is not ready for prime time.
Ultimately we'll want to unify the API of `bunde10` and `bundle20` to have less
different code. But for now, testing the bundle2 exchange flow is an higher
priority.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Fri, 04 Apr 2014 01:51:54 -0700] rev 20954
bundle2: add an exchange.getbundle function
This function can return a `HG10` or `HG20` bundle. It uses the `bundlecaps`
parameters to decides which one to return.
This is a distinct function from `changegroup.getbundle` for two reasons. First
the APIs of `bundle10` and `bundle20` are not compatible yet. The two functions
may be reunited in the future. Second `exchange.getbundle` will grow parameters
for all kinds of data (phases, obsmarkers, ...) so it's better to keep the
changegroup generation in its own function for now.
This function will be used it in the next changesets.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Fri, 04 Apr 2014 01:33:20 -0700] rev 20953
localpeer: propagate bundlecaps in getbundle call
Best arguments are the ones in use...
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 02 Apr 2014 23:56:49 -0700] rev 20952
bundle2: make it possible have a global transaction for the unbundling
We use the `gettransaction` method approach already used for pull. We
need this because we do not know beforehand if the bundle needs a
transaction to be created. And (1) we do not want to create a
transaction for nothing. (2) Some bundle2 bundles may be read-only and
do not require any lock or transaction to be held.
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Fri, 04 Apr 2014 17:47:19 -0500] rev 20951
tests: fix test output typo
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:37:59 -0700] rev 20950
bundle2: first crude version of bundling changeset with bundle2
The current changegroup format is put in a "changegroup" part and processed by
an appropriate handlers.
This is not production ready code, but let us start smoke testing.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 02 Apr 2014 22:37:50 -0700] rev 20949
bundle2: record processing results in the bundleoperation object
Part handlers can now add records to the `bundleoperation` object. This can be
used to help other parts or to let the caller of the unbundling process react
to the results.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 02 Apr 2014 22:24:44 -0700] rev 20948
bundle2: introduce a bundleoperation object
This object will hold all data and state gathered through the processing of a
bundle. This will allow:
- each handler to be aware of the things unbundled so far
- the caller to retrieve data about the execution
- bear useful object and logic (like repo, transaction)
- bear possible bundle2 reply triggered by the unbundling.
For now the object is very simple but it will grow at the same time as the
bundle2 implementation.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 02 Apr 2014 13:50:57 -0700] rev 20947
bundle2: feed a unbundle20 to the `processbundle` function
The unbundle can comes from multiple sources. (on disk file, peer, etc) and
(ultimately) of multiple type (bundle10, bundle20). The `processbundle` is no
longer in charge of creating the bundle.