Wed, 19 Mar 2014 23:36:15 -0700 bundle2: support for bundling and unbundling payload
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 19 Mar 2014 23:36:15 -0700] rev 20876
bundle2: support for bundling and unbundling payload We add the ability to bundle and unbundle a payload in parts. The payload is the actual binary data of the part. It is used to convey all the applicative data. For now we stick to very simple implementation with all the data fit in single chunk. This open the door to some bundle2 testing usage. This will be improved before bundle2 get used for real. We need to be able to stream the payload in multiple part to exchange any changegroup efficiently. This simple version will do for now. Bundling and unbundling are done in the same changeset because the test for parts is less modular. However, the result is not too complex.
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:59:06 -0500 merge with stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:59:06 -0500] rev 20875
merge with stable
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:57:04 -0500 Added signature for changeset 3f83fc5cfe71 stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:57:04 -0500] rev 20874
Added signature for changeset 3f83fc5cfe71
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:56:55 -0500 Added tag 2.9.2 for changeset 3f83fc5cfe71 stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:56:55 -0500] rev 20873
Added tag 2.9.2 for changeset 3f83fc5cfe71
Sat, 08 Mar 2014 18:52:16 +0900 backout: correct commit status of no changes made (BC) (issue4190) stable 2.9.2
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 08 Mar 2014 18:52:16 +0900] rev 20872
backout: correct commit status of no changes made (BC) (issue4190) If backout generated no changes to commit, it showed wrong status, "changeset <target> backs out changeset <target>", and raised TypeError with -v option. This changes the return code to 1, which is the same as "hg commit" and "hg rebase".
Sat, 08 Mar 2014 18:41:56 +0900 backout: document return code of merge conflict stable
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 08 Mar 2014 18:41:56 +0900] rev 20871
backout: document return code of merge conflict
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 15:11:19 -0500 merge with stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 15:11:19 -0500] rev 20870
merge with stable
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900 i18n: fix "% inside _()" problems stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900] rev 20869
i18n: fix "% inside _()" problems Before this patch, "contrib/check-code.py" can't detect these problems, because the regexp pattern to detect "% inside _()" doesn't suppose the case that format string consists of multiple string components concatenated implicitly or explicitly, This patch does below for that regexp pattern to detect "% inside _()" problems in such case. - put "+" into separator part ("[ \t\n]") for explicit concatenation ("...." + "...." style) - enclose "component and separator" part by "(?:....)+" for concatenation itself ("...." "...." or "...." + "....")
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900 i18n: fix "% inside _()" problems stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900] rev 20868
i18n: fix "% inside _()" problems Before this patch, "contrib/check-code.py" can't detect these problems, because the regexp pattern to detect "% inside _()" doesn't suppose the case that the format string and "%" aren't placed in the same line. This patch replaces "\s" in that regexp pattern with "[ \t\n]" to detect "% inside _()" problems in such case. "[\s\n]" can't be used in this purpose, because "\s" is automatically replaced with "[ \t]" by "_preparepats()" and "\s" in "[]" causes nested "[]" unexpectedly.
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900 merge: fix lack of "%s" in format string causing TypeError at runtime stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900] rev 20867
merge: fix lack of "%s" in format string causing TypeError at runtime
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip