Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Feb 2024 14:42:13 +0100] rev 51417
phases: pass an unfiltered repository to _ensure_phase_sets
It seems better for such a low level function to be able to assume it operate on
a real repository.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:01:25 +0100] rev 51416
phases: drop set building in `hasnonpublicphases`
We don't actually use the set, so why do we ensure they are built?
(we should also clean up the use of repository argument but that's a quest for later).
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:59:28 +0100] rev 51415
phases: gather the logic for phasesets update in a single method
This logic is duplicated around for no good reason, we gather it in a single
place.
The conditional is the new function are a bit weird as we about going to extend it soon.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:58:54 +0100] rev 51414
phases: change the way we warm the phasecache in repocache
Same logic as for the previous chngeset. We are about to rename and change the
method used here.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:56:05 +0100] rev 51413
phases: use a more generic way to trigger a phases computation for perf
Querying the tip most revision will require the cache to warm the same as
calling the dedicated method. This avoid using a method that is mostly meant for
internal use and will be renamed in a coming changesets.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Feb 2024 12:01:09 +0100] rev 51412
phases: fix an overzealous invalidation of the phase sets
If `len(cl) == self._loadedrevslen` the cache is up to date.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:04:56 +0100] rev 51411
phases: type annotation for `_phasesets`
Does not hurt.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:46:21 +0100] rev 51410
phases: leverage the collected information to record phase update
Since the lower level function already gather this information, we can directly
use it.
This comes with a small change to the test that are actually fixing them. The
previous version over-reported some phase change that did not exists. In both
case, we are force revision `1` to be secret and `0` remains draft`, the
previous code wrongly reported `0` as moving to secret while it properly
remained draft in the repository.