Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:46:29 -0700 rebase: fix crash with in-memory rebase and copies
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:46:29 -0700] rev 41949
rebase: fix crash with in-memory rebase and copies When using regular on-disk rebase, filectx.markcopies() calls to dirstate.copy(), which happily records the copy. Then it's simply ignored if it doesn't matter for the commit (as in the test case I added in the previous patch). Let's do the same for overlayworkingctx. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6133
Thu, 14 Mar 2019 13:53:20 -0700 test: demonstrate crash with in-memory rebase and copies
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 14 Mar 2019 13:53:20 -0700] rev 41948
test: demonstrate crash with in-memory rebase and copies In the added test case, there is a merge commit that has one obsolete parent with a rename. Since the rename is not in the other parent, pathcopies() from that other parent will include the copy. Then when we try to rebase this merge commit onto another commit that has the same content changes, but no tracking of the rename (because it was done with "hg remove; hg add" instead of "hg mv"), we try to propagate the copy information. That fails because overlayworkingctx expects a file to be modified if it's going to have copy information. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6132
Thu, 14 Mar 2019 09:12:46 +0000 manifestcache: actually honor --clear
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 14 Mar 2019 09:12:46 +0000] rev 41947
manifestcache: actually honor --clear Before this change, the --clear flag was not clearing the on disk cache. (We also remove the extra verbosity when using --clear. Same as what we did for --add)
Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:58:53 +0000 manifestcache: make sure the entry are ordered by access time
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:58:53 +0000] rev 41946
manifestcache: make sure the entry are ordered by access time This is an LRU cache, let us make sure of that.
Thu, 14 Mar 2019 09:12:27 +0000 manifestcache: adding a second distinct entry
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 14 Mar 2019 09:12:27 +0000] rev 41945
manifestcache: adding a second distinct entry Let makes sure the cache can hold multiple value.
Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:53:28 +0000 manifestcache: test that adding the same entry twice do not duplicates it
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:53:28 +0000] rev 41944
manifestcache: test that adding the same entry twice do not duplicates it Simple sanity check.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -6 +6 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip