Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:12:51 -0500 ssh: fix password test
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:12:51 -0500] rev 13755
ssh: fix password test We don't support passwords in ssh URLs, and neither do some versions of Python's urllib. Since we don't actually care much here, punt with a glob in the test.
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:39:54 +0100 dirstate: check mtime when adding to _lastnormal
Adrian Buehlmann <adrian@cadifra.com> [Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:39:54 +0100] rev 13754
dirstate: check mtime when adding to _lastnormal - consistently use mtime as mapped to dirstate granularity (needed for filesystems like NTFS, which have sub-second resolution) - no need to add files with mtime < _lastnormaltime - improve comments
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:17:49 +0100 subrepo: simplify hgsubrepo._get a little
Martin Geisler <mg@aragost.com> [Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:17:49 +0100] rev 13753
subrepo: simplify hgsubrepo._get a little
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 08:51:58 -0700 Fix expected url to match test.
Lee Cantey <lcantey@gmail.com> [Thu, 24 Mar 2011 08:51:58 -0700] rev 13752
Fix expected url to match test.
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:28:29 +0100 patch: deprecate ui.patch / external patcher feature
Patrick Mezard <pmezard@gmail.com> [Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:28:29 +0100] rev 13751
patch: deprecate ui.patch / external patcher feature Why? - Mercurial internal patcher works correctly for regular patches and git patches, is much faster at least on Windows and is more extensible. - In theory, the external patcher can be used to handle exotic patch formats. I do not know any and have not heard about any such use in years. - Most patch programs cannot handle git format patches, which makes the API caller to decide either to ignore ui.patch by calling patch.internalpatch() directly, or take the risk of random failures with valid inputs. - One thing a patch program could do Mercurial patcher cannot is applying with --reverse. Apparently several shelve like extensions try to use that, including passing the "reverse" option to Mercurial patcher, which has been removed mid-2009. I never heard anybody complain about that, and would prefer reimplementing it anyway. And from the technical perspective: - The external patcher makes everything harder to maintain and implement. EOL normalization is not implemented, and I would bet file renames, if supported by the patcher, are not correctly recorded in the dirstate. - No tests. How? - Remove related documentation - Clearly mark patch.externalpatch() as private - Remove the debuginstall check. This deprecation request was actually triggered by this last point. debuginstall is the only piece of code patching without a repository. When migrating to an integrated patch() + updatedir() call, this was really a showstopper, all workarounds were either ugly or uselessly complicated to implement. If we do not support external patcher anymore, the debuginstall check is not useful anymore. - Remove patch.externalpatch() after 1.9 release.
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:28:16 -0500 # User Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen <danchr@gmail.com>
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:28:16 -0500] rev 13750
# User Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen <danchr@gmail.com> # Date 1289564504 -3600 # Node ID b75264c15cc888cf38c3c7b8f619801e3c2589c7 # Parent 89b2e5d940f669e590096c6be70eee61c9172fff revsets: overload the branch() revset to also take a branch name. This should only change semantics in the specific case of a tag/branch conflict where the tag wasn't done on the branch with the same name. Previously, branch(whatever) would resolve to the branch of the tag in that case, whereas now it will resolve to the branch of the name. The previous behaviour, while documented, seemed very counter-intuitive to me. An alternate approach would be to introduce a new revset such as branchname() or namedbranch(). While this would retain backwards compatibility, the distinction between it and branch() would not be readily apparent to users. The most intuitive behaviour would be to have branch(x) require 'x' to be a branch name, and something like branchof(x) or samebranch(x) do what branch(x) currently does. Unfortunately, our backwards compatibility guarantees prevent us from doing that. Please note that while 'hg tag' guards against shadowing a branch, 'hg branch' does not. Besides, even if it did, that wouldn't solve the issue of conversions with such tags and branches...
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -6 +6 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip