Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Thu, 07 Aug 2014 11:56:32 -0700] rev 22076
transaction: use `self.journal` to create backup file
Transaction journal name is "journal" in most case, but it can be something else.
We use the appropriate attribute to create the file.
Sean Farley <sean.michael.farley@gmail.com> [Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:55:06 -0700] rev 22075
memctx: add note about p2
Sean Farley <sean.michael.farley@gmail.com> [Fri, 25 Jul 2014 20:20:26 -0500] rev 22074
memfilectx: add remove and write methods
Similar to the previous patch for workingfilectx, this patch will allow
abstracting localrepo.remove / write method to refactor working directory code
but instead operate on files in memory.
Sean Farley <sean.michael.farley@gmail.com> [Wed, 02 Jul 2014 14:01:01 -0500] rev 22073
workingfilectx: add remove and write methods
This patch will allow abstracting localrepo.remove / write method to refactor
working directory code.
Sean Farley <sean.michael.farley@gmail.com> [Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:36:01 -0500] rev 22072
memctx: create a filectxfn if it is not callable
This will allow future patches to construct a memctx based on another context
or any other store-type object.
Augie Fackler <raf@durin42.com> [Thu, 07 Aug 2014 11:39:19 -0400] rev 22071
test-patchbomb.t: work around Python change
d579866d6419 (
issue4188)
Python 2.7.7 and later (as well as some ubuntu/debian packages of
2.7.6) include a fix that makes the email module more pedantically
correct for MIME boundaries, but this breaks our tests. We work around
this by filtering the output of any 'hg email' invocations in the test
that produce MIME messages.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 05 Aug 2014 23:52:21 -0700] rev 22070
phase: add a transaction argument to retractboundary
We now pass a transaction option to this phase movement function. The
object is currently not used by the function, but it will be in the
future.
All call sites have been updated. Most call sites were already enclosed in a
transaction for a long time. The handful of others have been recently
updated in previous commit.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 06 Aug 2014 01:54:19 -0700] rev 22069
phase: add a transaction argument to advanceboundary
We now pass a transaction option to this phase movement function. The object
is currently not used by the function, but it will be in the future.
All call sites have been updated. Most call sites were already enclosed in a
transaction for a long time. The handful of others have been recently
updated in previous commit.
The retractboundary function remains to be upgraded.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:54:37 -0700] rev 22068
pull: pre-filter remote phases before moving local ones
We were relying on the phase internals to filter out redundant phase
information from remove. However as we plan to integrate phase
movement inside the transaction, we want to avoid useless transaction
creation on no-op pulls.
Therefore we filter out all the information that already matches the current
repository state. This will let us create a transaction only when there is
actual phase movement needed.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 06 Aug 2014 01:40:51 -0700] rev 22067
test-check-commit-hg.t: automatically test all 'draft() and ::.' changesets
We introduce a test-check-commit-hg.t file that will happily run the
check-commit file on all draft changeset under the working directory.
This should help newcomers to catch up with the rules. (And will helps old timer
from time to time).
Alexander Sauta <demosito@gmail.com> [Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:08:42 +0100] rev 22066
i18n-ru: syncronized with
45a01832cad1
Alexander Sauta <demosito@gmail.com> [Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:21:58 +0100] rev 22065
merge with i18n
Alexander Sauta <demosito@gmail.com> [Mon, 04 Aug 2014 18:51:18 +0400] rev 22064
i18n-ru: sync with
ad56fc55cbc3 (fuzzies)
Alexander Sauta <demosito@gmail.com> [Fri, 01 Aug 2014 19:49:28 +0400] rev 22063
i18n-ru: sync with
ad56fc55cbc3 (missing strings)
Vladimir Zakharov <zakharov.vv@gmail.com> [Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:24:08 +0400] rev 22062
i18n-ru: update 'revisions' translation
Vladimir Zakharov <zakharov.vv@gmail.com> [Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:08:41 +0400] rev 22061
i18n-ru: update 'revsets' translation
Alexander Sauta <demosito@gmail.com> [Wed, 16 Oct 2013 08:22:06 +0100] rev 22060
i18n-ru: prompts fixed
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Thu, 07 Aug 2014 14:58:12 -0500] rev 22059
whitespace: nuke triple blank lines in **.py
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Thu, 07 Aug 2014 14:57:20 -0500] rev 22058
check-commit: spot growing whitespace
We discourage PEP-8-style double blank lines, spot them creeping in.
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <jordigh@octave.org> [Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:06:08 -0400] rev 22057
strip: remove -b/--backup codepaths
cset
ba3bc6474bbf has removed this option. This commit just tidies the
code that was associated to it. It also fixes the internal calls to
the strip() function.
Before this change, any function that thought it would want as a final
safety to keep a partial backup bundle (bundling changes not linearly
related to the current change being stripped), had to explicitly pass
a backup="strip" option. With this change, these backups are always
kept in case of an exception and always removed if there is no
exception. Only full backups can be specified with backup=True or no
full backups with backup=False.
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <jordigh@octave.org> [Thu, 07 Aug 2014 12:51:45 -0400] rev 22056
simplemerge: remove dead code
The following functions in simplemerge are dead code. I reran "make
test-merge*" after this change, and it passed. Looks like cruft that
we've been carrying since we nabbed this code from bzr.
Sean Farley <sean.michael.farley@gmail.com> [Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:26:51 -0700] rev 22055
basectx: add missing, merge, and branch args to dirty method
This fixes a discrepency for basectx and classes that inherit from it. Now
callers can pass these arguments to any context without an exception being
raised.
Sean Farley <sean.michael.farley@gmail.com> [Fri, 25 Jul 2014 20:11:47 -0500] rev 22054
basefilectx: move isexec and islink from memfilectx
This will be used in the future for creating memctx objects from other
store-type objects, such as a patch store or even another context.
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Wed, 06 Aug 2014 12:16:58 -0500] rev 22053
tests: fix pyflakes test whitespace breakage
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:54:58 -0700] rev 22052
pushkey: wrap pushkey phase movement in a transaction
Phases are not yet inside the transaction, but we need to prepare for it. So we
wrap the phase movement inside a transaction.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:54:15 -0700] rev 22051
push: wrap local phase movement in a transaction
Phases are not yet inside the transaction, but we need to prepare for it. So we
wrap the phase movement inside a transaction.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:50:53 -0700] rev 22050
phase: wrap `hg phases` phase movement in a transaction
Phases are not yet inside the transaction, but we need to prepare for it. So we
wrap the phase movement inside a transaction.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:50:07 -0700] rev 22049
mq: wrap qimport phase movement in a transaction
Phases are not yet inside the transaction, but we need to prepare for it. So we
wrap the phase movement inside a transaction.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:48:51 -0700] rev 22048
mq: wrap qfinish phase movement in a transaction
Phases are not yet inside the transaction, but we need to prepare for it. So we
wrap the phase movement inside a transaction.
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Wed, 06 Aug 2014 11:53:08 -0500] rev 22047
tests: change some #ifs to #requires
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Wed, 06 Aug 2014 11:43:59 -0500] rev 22046
tests: replace exit 80 with #require
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Wed, 06 Aug 2014 10:34:54 -0500] rev 22045
run-tests: add #require to abort full test
This allows nuking a bunch of ugly hghave || exit 80 lines.
Augie Fackler <raf@durin42.com> [Tue, 05 Aug 2014 21:17:11 -0400] rev 22044
run-tests: add support for xunit test reports
The Jenkins CI system understands xunit reports natively, so this will
be helpful for anyone that wants to use Jenkins for testing hg or
extensions that use run-tests.py for their testing.
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Wed, 06 Aug 2014 02:45:55 -0500] rev 22043
contrib: add check-commit hook script to sanity-check commits
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 05 Aug 2014 13:51:13 -0700] rev 22042
shelve: use `targetphase` while unbundling
This removes the last manual phase movement in shelve.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 05 Aug 2014 13:49:38 -0700] rev 22041
changegroup: add a `targetphase` argument to `addchangegroup`
This argument controls the phase used for the added changesets. This can be
useful to unbundle in "secret" phase as required by shelve.
This change aims at helping high-level code get rid of manual phase
movement. An important milestone for having phases part of the transaction.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:37:45 -0700] rev 22040
shelve: do not retract phase boundary by hand
We rely on the internal mechanism to commit the changeset in the right state.
This is similar to what the mq extension is doing.
This is an important change as we plan to move phase movement with the
transaction. Avoiding phase movement from high level code will avoid them the
burden of transaction handling. It is also important to limit the need for
transaction handling as this limits the odds of people messing up. Most common
expected mess-up is to use a different transaction for changesets creation and
phase adjustment.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 05 Aug 2014 18:53:05 -0700] rev 22039
commit: update the --secret code to use backupconfig and restoreconfig
Those dedicated methods also preserve all associated data (eg:
sources, lack of value).
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 05 Aug 2014 13:22:44 -0700] rev 22038
rebase: do not retract phase boundary by hand
We rely on the internal mechanism to commit the changeset in the right phase.
This similar to what the mq extension is doing.
This is an important change as we plan to includes phase movement within the
transaction. Avoiding phase movement from high-level code will avoid the
burden of transaction handling. It is also important to limit the need for
transaction handling as this limits the odds of people messing up. Most common
expected mess-up is code using a different transaction for changeset creation
and phase adjustment.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 05 Aug 2014 21:16:24 -0700] rev 22037
config: fix restoreconfig of non existing config
When the section, but no value existed, the `del` call raised a key error.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:51:17 -0700] rev 22036
push: use stepsdone for obsmarkers push
We do not have infrastructure to include obsolescence markers in the bundle2
push from core. But extensions may so we make sure it would not be sent twice.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Sat, 05 Jul 2014 19:32:20 +0200] rev 22035
push: introduce a discovery step for obsmarker
The discovery step is still not doing anything smart. But this will allow
extension to wrap it.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Sat, 05 Jul 2014 19:17:09 +0200] rev 22034
push: move the list of obsmarker to push into the push operation
The list is now carried in the push operation, this will let
extensions override it.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Fri, 04 Jul 2014 19:31:49 +0200] rev 22033
push: explicitly encode a list of obsmarkers to push
Sending obsmarkers through pushkey requires extra encoding (since pushkey can't
take binary content) and slicing (since we can hit http header limit). As we
send all obsolescences markers that exists in the repo for each push, we used to
just look at the content of the "obsolete" pushkey namespace (already encoded
and sliced) and send its
content.
However, future changeset will make it possible to push only parts of the
obsmarkers. To prepare this we now explicitly encode a list of markers. The list
of markers is still "all of them" but future changeset will takes care
of that.
The new code uses a "_protected" method but that seems reasonable to keep it
private as this is the is the only external user of it and this whole pushing
obsmarker through pushkey things in fairly hacky already)
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:32:41 -0700] rev 22032
merge-tools: add a `premerge=keep-merge3` config option
This value leaves premerge markers that includes the merge base too. This is a
the same as what `internal:merge3` would do.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:58:39 -0700] rev 22031
merge-tools: make premerge valid values extensible
We want to introduce a version leaving merge3 style markers.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:50:15 -0700] rev 22030
mergetools: add a test for premerge --keep
It works! No surprise.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:39:47 -0700] rev 22029
test-merge-tools: introduce a "revision 4" that merges with conflict
We need conflicts to test the premerge=keep configuration.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:58:45 -0700] rev 22028
merge: add an internal:merge3 tool
This variant gives access to a feature already present in ``internal:merge``:
displaying merge base content.
In the basic merge (calling ``hg merge``) case, including more context to the
merge markers is an interesting addition.
But this extra information is the only viable option in case conflict from
grafting (, rebase, etc…).
When grafting ``source`` on ``destination``, the parent of ``source`` is
used as the ``base``. When all three changesets add content in the same
location, the marker for ``source`` will contains both ``base`` and ``source``
content. Without the content of base exposed, there is no way for the user
to discriminate content coming from ``base`` and content commit from ``source``.
Practical example (all addition are in the same place):
* ``destination`` adds ``Dest-Content``
* ``base`` adds ``Base-Content``
* ``source`` adds ``Src-Content``
Grafting ``source`` on ``destination`` will produce the following conflict:
<<<<<<< destination
Dest-Content
=======
Base-Content
Src-Content
>>>>>>> source
This that case there is no way to distinct ``base`` from ``source``. As a result
content from ``base`` are likely to slip in the resolution result.
However, adding the base make the situation very clear:
<<<<<<< destination
Dest-Content
||||||| base
Base-Content
======= base
Base-Content
Src-Content
>>>>>>> source
Once the base is added, the addition from the grafted changeset is made clear.
User can compare the content from ``base`` and ``source`` to make an enlightened
decision during merge resolution.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 05 Aug 2014 15:09:54 -0700] rev 22027
internal:merge: update documentation
Highlight the fact there are two regions in the markers and what their contents
are. This prepares for the arrival of merge3.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 05 Aug 2014 15:17:38 -0700] rev 22026
filemerge: allow the formatting of three labels instead of two
When a third label is provided (to included the base content) it is properly
processed as the two others. Nothing changes if only two labels are provided.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 05 Aug 2014 15:12:22 -0700] rev 22025
filemerge: drop extra white space
There should be no white space around the brace.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 05 Aug 2014 15:10:50 -0700] rev 22024
simplemerge: support three labels when merging
If a third label is provided it will be used for the "base" content:
<<<<<<< local
content
from
local
||||||| base
former
common
=======
other
conflicting
>>>>>>> other
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:56:25 -0700] rev 22023
simplemerge: burn "minimal" feature to the ground
Matt Mackall said:
The goal of simplemerge should have always been to be a drop-in
replacement for RCS merge. Please nuke this minimization thing entirely.
This whole things is now dead.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 29 Jul 2014 11:55:01 -0700] rev 22022
merge: use no-minimal for premerge too
ecc1387138ba disabled minimal for `internal:merge` but forgot to also disabled
it for premerge. This is now done.
This gives me an occasion to shamelessly includes my explanation of why this
minimisation feature must disappear:
[this is why it's pointless to reject patches with misspellings in the
description - mpm]
Detailled explanation
=====================
The ``simplemerge`` code use in ``internal:merge`` has a feature called
"minimization". It reprocess conflicting chunks to find common changes
inside them and excludes such common sections from the marker.
This approach seems a significant win at first glance but produces very
confusing results in some other cases.
Simple example
--------------
A simple example is enough to show the benefit of this feature. In this merge,
both sides change all numbers from letters to digits, but one side is also
changing some values.
$ cat << EOF > base
> Small Mathematical Series.
> One
> Two
> Three
> Four
> Five
> Hop we are done.
> EOF
$ cat << EOF > local
> Small Mathematical Series.
> 1
> 2
> 3
> 4
> 5
> Hop we are done.
> EOF
$ cat << EOF > other
> Small Mathematical Series.
> 1
> 2
> 3
> 6
> 8
> Hop we are done.
> EOF
In the minimalists case, the markers focus on the disagreement between the two
sides.
$ $TESTDIR/../contrib/simplemerge --print local base other
Small Mathematical Series.
1
2
3
<<<<<<< local
4
5
=======
6
8
>>>>>>> other
Hop we are done.
warning: conflicts during merge.
[1]
In the non minimalist case, the whole chunk is included in the conflict marker.
Making it harder spot actual differences.
$ $TESTDIR/../contrib/simplemerge --print --no-minimal local base other
Small Mathematical Series.
<<<<<<< local
1
2
3
4
5
=======
1
2
3
6
8
>>>>>>> other
Hop we are done.
warning: conflicts during merge.
[1]
Practical Advantages of minimalisation: merge of grafted change
---------------------------------------------------------------
This feature can be very useful when a change have been grafted in another
branch and then some change have been made to the grafted code.
$ cat << EOF > base
> # empty file
> EOF
$ cat << EOF > local
> def somefunction(one, two):
> some = one
> stuff = two
> are(happening)
> here()
> EOF
$ cat << EOF > other
> def somefunction(one, two):
> some = one
> change = two
> are(happening)
> here()
> EOF
The minimalist case recognises the grafted content as similar and highlight the
actual change.
$ $TESTDIR/../contrib/simplemerge --print local base other
def somefunction(one, two):
some = one
<<<<<<< local
stuff = two
=======
change = two
>>>>>>> other
are(happening)
here()
warning: conflicts during merge.
[1]
Again, the non-minimalist case produces a larger conflict. Making it harder to
spot the actual conflict.
$ $TESTDIR/../contrib/simplemerge --print --no-minimal local base other
<<<<<<< local
def somefunction(one, two):
some = one
stuff = two
are(happening)
here()
=======
def somefunction(one, two):
some = one
change = two
are(happening)
here()
>>>>>>> other
warning: conflicts during merge.
[1]
Practical disadvantage: multiple functions on each side
---------------------------------------------------------------
So, if this "minimalist" help so much, why introduce a setting to disable it?
The issue is that this minimisation will grab any common lines for breaking
chunks. This may result in partial context when solving a merge. The most
simple example is a merge where both side added some (different) functions
separated by blank lines. The "minimalist" approach will recognise the blank
line as "common" and over slice the chunks, turning a simple conflict case into
multiple pairs of conflicting functions.
$ cat << EOF > base
> # empty file
> EOF
$ cat << EOF > local
> def function1():
> bla()
> bla()
> bla()
>
> def function2():
> ble()
> ble()
> ble()
> EOF
$ cat << EOF > other
> def function3():
> bli()
> bli()
> bli()
>
> def function4():
> blo()
> blo()
> blo()
> EOF
The minimal case presents each function as a separated context.
$ $TESTDIR/../contrib/simplemerge --print local base other
<<<<<<< local
def function1():
bla()
bla()
bla()
=======
def function3():
bli()
bli()
bli()
>>>>>>> other
<<<<<<< local
def function2():
ble()
ble()
ble()
=======
def function4():
blo()
blo()
blo()
>>>>>>> other
warning: conflicts during merge.
[1]
The non-minimalist approach produces a simpler version with more context in
each block. Solving such conflicts is usually as simple as dropping the 3 lines
dedicated to markers.
$ $TESTDIR/../contrib/simplemerge --prin --no-minimal local base other
<<<<<<< local
def function1():
bla()
bla()
bla()
def function2():
ble()
ble()
ble()
=======
def function3():
bli()
bli()
bli()
def function4():
blo()
blo()
blo()
>>>>>>> other
warning: conflicts during merge.
[1]
Practical disaster: programing language have a lot of common line
=================================================================
If only blank lines between function where the only frequent content of a code
file. But programming language tend to repeat them self much more often. In that
case, the minimalist approach turns a simple conflict into a massive mess.
Consider this example where two unrelated functions are added on each side.
Those function shares common programming constructs by chance.
$ cat << EOF > base
> # empty file
> EOF
$ cat << EOF > local
> def longfunction():
> if bla:
> foo
> else:
> bar
> try:
> ret = some stuff
> except Exception:
> ret = None
> if ret is not None:
> return ret
> return 0
>
> def shortfunction(foo):
> goo()
> ret = foo + 5
> return ret
> EOF
$ cat << EOF > other
> def otherlongfunction():
> for x in xxx:
> if coin:
> break
> tutu
> else:
> bar()
> baz()
> ret = week()
> try:
> groumpf = tutu
> fool()
> except Exception:
> zoo()
> pool()
> if cond:
> return ret
>
> # some big block
> ret ** 6
> koin()
> return ret
> EOF
The minimalist approach will hash the whole conflict into small chunks that
does not match any meaningful semantic and are impossible to solve.
$ $TESTDIR/../contrib/simplemerge --print local base other
<<<<<<< local
def longfunction():
if bla:
foo
=======
def otherlongfunction():
for x in xxx:
if coin:
break
tutu
>>>>>>> other
else:
<<<<<<< local
bar
=======
bar()
baz()
ret = week()
>>>>>>> other
try:
<<<<<<< local
ret = some stuff
=======
groumpf = tutu
fool()
>>>>>>> other
except Exception:
<<<<<<< local
ret = None
if ret is not None:
=======
zoo()
pool()
if cond:
>>>>>>> other
return ret
<<<<<<< local
return 0
=======
>>>>>>> other
<<<<<<< local
def shortfunction(foo):
goo()
ret = foo + 5
=======
# some big block
ret ** 6
koin()
>>>>>>> other
return ret
warning: conflicts during merge.
[1]
The non minimalist approach will properly produce a single set of conflict
markers. Highlighting that the two chunk are unrelated. Such conflict from
unrelated content added at the same place is usually solved by dropping the
marker an keeping both content. Something impossible with minimised markers.
$ $TESTDIR/../contrib/simplemerge --prin --no-minimal local base other
<<<<<<< local
def longfunction():
if bla:
foo
else:
bar
try:
ret = some stuff
except Exception:
ret = None
if ret is not None:
return ret
return 0
def shortfunction(foo):
goo()
ret = foo + 5
return ret
=======
def otherlongfunction():
for x in xxx:
if coin:
break
tutu
else:
bar()
baz()
ret = week()
try:
groumpf = tutu
fool()
except Exception:
zoo()
pool()
if cond:
return ret
# some big block
ret ** 6
koin()
return ret
>>>>>>> other
warning: conflicts during merge.
[1]
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Mon, 09 Jun 2014 23:37:36 -0700] rev 22021
merge: refactor labels selection code
The code is simplified to prepare the future introduction of a third labels for
the merge base.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 01 Jul 2014 23:08:17 +0200] rev 22020
push: include phase push in the unified bundle2 push
Phase push is now included in the same bundle2 push as changesets. We use
multiple pushkey parts to transmit the information. Note that phase moves are
still not part of the repository "transaction".
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:26:47 -0700] rev 22019
push: perform phases discovery before the push
This will allow including phase information in the same bundle2 as the
changesets.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 01 Jul 2014 17:06:02 +0200] rev 22018
push: make discovery extensible
We need to gather all discovery before the unified bundle2 push. We
use the same pattern as bundle2 parts generation.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:04:50 -0700] rev 22017
push: rework the bundle2partsgenerators logic
Instead of a single list of functions, we now have a list of names and
a mapping of names to functions. This simplifies wrapping of steps
from extensions. In the same move, declaration becomes decorator-based
(syntax sugar, nom nom nom!).