Fri, 21 Sep 2018 11:15:55 -0400 py3: mark another passing test
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Fri, 21 Sep 2018 11:15:55 -0400] rev 39755
py3: mark another passing test Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4689
Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:47:49 +0900 bookmarks: remove --active in favor of --list
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:47:49 +0900] rev 39754
bookmarks: remove --active in favor of --list It's weird that we have both --active and --inactive options meaning completely different things. Instead of adding a one-off option, let's document the way to display the active bookmark by using -l/--list. No deprecated option is added since --active isn't released yet.
Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:44:23 +0900 bookmarks: add explicit option to list bookmarks of the given names
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:44:23 +0900] rev 39753
bookmarks: add explicit option to list bookmarks of the given names This is a generalized form of the --active option. A redundant sorted() call is removed. There was no point to update dict items in lexicographical order.
Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:34:13 +0900 bookmarks: reject --delete with --inactive which makes no sense
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:34:13 +0900] rev 39752
bookmarks: reject --delete with --inactive which makes no sense A deleted bookmark is neither active nor inactive.
Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:32:01 +0900 bookmarks: parse out --inactive to action early
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:32:01 +0900] rev 39751
bookmarks: parse out --inactive to action early The --inactive option can't be directly mapped to an action or a modifier. With any names, it means to add/rename to inactive bookmarks. Without names, it means to deactivate the current bookmark. This patch separates them to "inactive" flag and "action == 'inactive'".
Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:25:19 +0900 bookmarks: parse out implicit "add" action early
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:25:19 +0900] rev 39750
bookmarks: parse out implicit "add" action early This prepares for adding -l/--list option, which can be combined with the positional arguments.
Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:07:38 +0900 bookmarks: clarify that opts['rename'] points to an old bookmark to be renamed
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:07:38 +0900] rev 39749
bookmarks: clarify that opts['rename'] points to an old bookmark to be renamed
Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:04:29 +0900 bookmarks: refactor option checking to pick one from --delete/rename/active
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:04:29 +0900] rev 39748
bookmarks: refactor option checking to pick one from --delete/rename/active
Sat, 15 Sep 2018 11:51:15 +0900 bookmarks: convert opts to bytes dict early
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 15 Sep 2018 11:51:15 +0900] rev 39747
bookmarks: convert opts to bytes dict early
Sat, 15 Sep 2018 11:50:07 +0900 bookmarks: pass in formatter to printbookmarks() instead of opts (API)
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 15 Sep 2018 11:50:07 +0900] rev 39746
bookmarks: pass in formatter to printbookmarks() instead of opts (API) This clarifies that user options have to be processed before calling printbookmarks().
Wed, 19 Sep 2018 17:09:01 +0200 strip: ignore orphaned internal changesets while computing safe strip roots
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Wed, 19 Sep 2018 17:09:01 +0200] rev 39745
strip: ignore orphaned internal changesets while computing safe strip roots Internal changeset can be safely garbage collected, so we can ignore them during safestrip. (Another phase for internal changeset that must be kept in the repository might be introduced later).
Wed, 06 Jun 2018 02:31:46 +0200 shelve: no longer strip internal commit when using internal phase
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Wed, 06 Jun 2018 02:31:46 +0200] rev 39744
shelve: no longer strip internal commit when using internal phase When the internal phase is used, the internal commits we create during shelve will be automatically hidden, and we don't need to strip them. Avoiding strips gives much better performances and is less traumatic for caches. Test changes are all related to revision numbers increasing more quickly since we avoid stripping. At the end of `test-shelve.t` we now need manually strip the shelve-commit in addition to the x.shelve file deletion. This emulates a preexisting shelve after a repository upgrade. Note: The hidden internal commits confuses rebase a bit as shown by a new test added. This will happen when the user have shelve commits on top of a changeset to be rebased. We'll fix this in the next commit. As we still use a backup bundle, rebase can just strip the internal changesets and be fine.
Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:07:52 -0700 meld: enable auto-merge
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:07:52 -0700] rev 39743
meld: enable auto-merge This tells meld to resolve trivial conflicts before presenting the user with the remaining conflicts. This was attempted 5 years ago, but then --auto-merge was too new that the patch was rejected out of concern that users still had an older version of meld installed [1]. Maybe it's safe to assume that they have a newer version now. [1] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2013-April/050084.html Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4665
Thu, 20 Sep 2018 23:45:30 -0400 run-tests: partially backout PYTHON quoting
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 20 Sep 2018 23:45:30 -0400] rev 39742
run-tests: partially backout PYTHON quoting In 7f8b7a060584, I quoted this to support python being installed to "Program Files". Even though the string passed to os.popen() is this: "c:/Python27/python.exe" -c "import mercurial; print (mercurial.__path__[0])" ... cmd.exe is trying to run this: 'c:/Python27/python.exe" -c "import' This caused test-hghave.t to fail, reporting 'unexpected mercurial lib: ""', because the failed execution prints nothing to stdout. Py3 fails as though it's not quoted. For whatever reason, print() shows up in the output when run with py2, but not py3, so I'm having a hard time debugging this. For now, let's fix the buildbot.
Fri, 21 Sep 2018 03:16:08 +0530 py3: use '%d' instead of '%s' for integers
Pulkit Goyal <pulkit@yandex-team.ru> [Fri, 21 Sep 2018 03:16:08 +0530] rev 39741
py3: use '%d' instead of '%s' for integers Python 3 does not allow to use '%s' for integers. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4688
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -15 +15 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip