Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 10 May 2019 14:27:22 -0700] rev 42290
overlayworkingctx: don't include added-then-deleted files in memctx
If a file (such as a .orig file) is temporarily added to the
overlayworkingctx and then deleted, it's still going to be in the
_cache dict. In tomemctx(), we created the list of files from
_cache.keys(), so the memctx.files() would include the temporary
file. That was fine because the list of files was only used in
localrepo.commitctx() (I think), where there's an extra filtering of
incorrectly removed files (annotated with an inaccurate "update
manifest" comment). I'd like to call memctx.files() in another case,
but first we need to make it accurate.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6361
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 10 May 2019 10:23:46 -0700] rev 42289
tests: demonstrate loss of changeset copy metadata on rebase
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6360
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 10 May 2019 11:03:54 -0700] rev 42288
overlaycontext: allow calling copydata() on clean context
We should just report no copy if the context is clean.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6358
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 10 May 2019 10:23:08 -0700] rev 42287
tests: demonstrate another failure with in-memory rebase and copies
This is a similar to
dd1ab72be983 (test: demonstrate crash with
in-memory rebase and copies, 2019-03-14). The new failure started with
57203e0210f8 (copies: calculate mergecopies() based on pathcopies(),
2019-04-11). It happens in the call to mergemod.update() on
rebase.py:1268 where we call mergemod.update() to graft a node. Since
the mergecopies() rewrite, that calls _related() with the filectx from
the overlaywctx instead of a filectx from the changectx where the file
was last modified. Either should be fine, so I don't think that's
a bug.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6357
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 14 May 2019 16:40:49 -0700] rev 42286
commit: fix a typo ("form p1" -> "from p1")
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6375
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:48:26 -0700] rev 42285
automation: initial support for running Linux tests
Building on top of our Windows automation support, this commit
implements support for performing automated tasks on remote Linux
machines. Specifically, we implement support for running tests
on ephemeral EC2 instances. This seems to be a worthwhile place
to start, as building packages on Linux is more or less a solved
problem because we already have facilities for building in Docker
containers, which provide "good enough" reproducibility guarantees.
The new `run-tests-linux` command works similarly to
`run-tests-windows`: it ensures an AMI with hg dependencies is
available, provisions a temporary EC2 instance with this AMI, pushes
local changes to that instance via SSH, then invokes `run-tests.py`.
Using this new command, I am able to run the entire test harness
substantially faster then I am on my local machine courtesy of
access to massive core EC2 instances:
wall: 16:20 ./run-tests.py -l (i7-6700K)
wall: 14:00 automation.py run-tests-linux --ec2-instance c5.2xlarge
wall: 8:30 automation.py run-tests-linux --ec2-instance m5.4xlarge
wall: 8:04 automation.py run-tests-linux --ec2-instance c5.4xlarge
wall: 4:30 automation.py run-tests-linux --ec2-instance c5.9xlarge
wall: 3:57 automation.py run-tests-linux --ec2-instance m5.12xlarge
wall: 3:05 automation.py run-tests-linux --ec2-instance m5.24xlarge
wall: 3:02 automation.py run-tests-linux --ec2-instance c5.18xlarge
~3 minute wall time to run pretty much the entire test harness is
not too bad!
The AMIs install multiple versions of Python. And the run-tests-linux
command specifies which one to use:
automation.py run-tests-linux --python system3
automation.py run-tests-linux --python 3.5
automation.py run-tests-linux --python pypy2.7
By default, the system Python 2.7 is used. Using this functionality,
I was able to identity some unexpected test failures on PyPy!
Included in the feature is support for running with alternate
filesystems. You can simply pass --filesystem to the command to
specify the type of filesystem to run tests on. When the ephemeral
instance is started, a new filesystem will be created and tests
will run from it:
wall: 4:30 automation.py run-tests-linux --ec2-instance c5.9xlarge
wall: 4:20 automation.py run-tests-linux --ec2-instance c5d.9xlarge --filesystem xfs
wall: 4:24 automation.py run-tests-linux --ec2-instance c5d.9xlarge --filesystem tmpfs
wall: 4:26 automation.py run-tests-linux --ec2-instance c5d.9xlarge --filesystem ext4
We also support multiple Linux distributions:
$ automation.py run-tests-linux --distro debian9
total time: 298.1s; setup: 60.7s; tests: 237.5s; setup overhead: 20.4%
$ automation.py run-tests-linux --distro ubuntu18.04
total time: 286.1s; setup: 61.3s; tests: 224.7s; setup overhead: 21.4%
$ automation.py run-tests-linux --distro ubuntu18.10
total time: 278.5s; setup: 58.2s; tests: 220.3s; setup overhead: 20.9%
$ automation.py run-tests-linux --distro ubuntu19.04
total time: 265.8s; setup: 42.5s; tests: 223.3s; setup overhead: 16.0%
Debian and Ubuntu are supported because those are what I use and am
most familiar with. It should be easy enough to add support for other
distros.
Unlike the Windows AMIs, Linux EC2 instances bill per second. So
the cost to instantiating an ephemeral instance isn't as severe.
That being said, there is some overhead, as it takes several dozen
seconds for the instance to boot, push local changes, and build
Mercurial. During this time, the instance is largely CPU idle and
wasting money. Even with this inefficiency, running tests is
relatively cheap: $0.15-$0.25 per full test run. A machine running
tests as efficiently as these EC2 instances would cost say $6,000, so
you can run the test harness a >20,000 times for the cost of an
equivalent machine. Running tests in EC2 is almost certainly cheaper
than buying a beefy machine for developers to use :)
# no-check-commit because foo_bar function names
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6319
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 23 Apr 2019 21:57:32 -0700] rev 42284
automation: move image operations to own functions
An upcoming commit will need this functionality with slightly different
values and it is enough code to not want to duplicate. Let's refactor
into standalone functions so it can be reused.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6318
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:18:23 -0700] rev 42283
automation: add --version argument to build-all-windows-packages
This lets us pass a version string through when building all
Windows packages, just like we can do with the individual commands
which produce installers.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6317
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:32:24 -0700] rev 42282
automation: do a force push to synchronize
We don't know what the state of the remote is. Force pushing will
be more resilient.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6316
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:21:02 -0700] rev 42281
automation: add check that hg source directory is a repo
Synchronizing from e.g. source distributions is not yet supported.
Let's add a check so we fail with an error message indicating
such.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6315