Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:18:17 +0100] rev 51439
relnotes: remove outdated message from `next`
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:10:44 +0100] rev 51438
branching: merge default into stable for 6.7rc0
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:09:18 +0100] rev 51437
branching: merge stable into default
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 14:07:33 +0100] rev 51436
perf: add a --as-push option to perf::unbundle
This turned out to make a quite significant difference.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 06:25:09 +0100] rev 51435
chainsaw-update: exit early if one of the intermediate command fails
That will prevent the user to be presented with a start that pretend to be
consistent with the request, but is not.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 03:32:35 +0100] rev 51434
chainsaw-update: lock the repository for the duration of the operation
This should prevent and catch some misusage where something else try to touch
the repository.
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 11:41:55 +0100] rev 51433
chainsaw-update: taking care of initial cloning
Perhaps we should go just a bit lower level than this `instance()`,
since the main added value in our use-case is full path resolution,
that we need to do anyway for the rmtree cleanup.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 11:30:58 +0100] rev 51432
chainsaw-update: use a graph with branching in graph
This will be relevant for the next improvement of `chainsaw-update`.
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Wed, 17 Jan 2024 14:39:06 +0100] rev 51431
chainsaw-update: log actual locks breaking
Previously, the command would simply state that it was about
to break locks, not if there was actually some to break.
This version is race-free. It would be also possible to display
the content of the lock before hand (not race-free but informative
in almost all cases).
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Wed, 17 Jan 2024 14:26:58 +0100] rev 51430
vfs: have tryunlink tell what it did
It is useful in certain circumstances to know whether vfs.tryunlink()
actually removed something or not, be it for logging purposes.
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Sat, 26 Nov 2022 12:23:56 +0100] rev 51429
chainsaw: new extension for dangerous operations
The first provided command is `chainsaw-update`, whose one and single job is
to make sure that it will pull, update and purge the target repository,
no matter what may be in the way (locks, notably), see docstring for rationale.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 03:45:07 +0100] rev 51428
rust: disable the RustIndex without persistent nodemap
See rational inline.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 03:44:56 +0100] rev 51427
rust: stop claiming the C index is compatible with the rust code
This is no longer the case since the introduction of the pure Rust Index, and
was probably not the case since the MixedIndex itself.
So we fix the dedicated attribute value.
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:11:26 +0100] rev 51426
rust-index: remove one collect when converting back
Turns out this is slightly faster. Sending the results back to Python is still
the most costly (like 75% of the time) of the whole method, but it's about
as fast as it can be now.
hg perf::phases on mozilla-try-2023-03-22
before: 0.267114
after: 0.247101
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:06:16 +0100] rev 51425
rust-index: improve phase computation speed
While less memory efficient, using an array is *much* faster than using a
HashMap, especially with the default hasher. It even makes the code simpler,
so I'm not really sure what I was thinking in the first place, maybe it's more
obvious now.
This fix a significant performance regression when using the rust version of the
code. (however, the C code still outperform rust on this operation)
hg perf::phases on mozilla-try-2023-03-22
- 6.6.3: 0.451239 seconds
- before: 0.982495 seconds
- after: 0.265347 seconds
- C code: 0.183241 second
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 06:37:25 +0100] rev 51424
phases: directly update the phase sets in advanceboundary
This is similar to what we do in retractboundary. There is no need to invalidate
the cache if we have everything at hand to update it.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 05:25:35 +0100] rev 51423
phases: large rework of advance boundary
In a similar spirit as the rework of retractboundary, the new algorithm is doing
an amount of work in the order of magnitude of the amount of changeset that
changes phases. (except to find new roots in impacted higher phases if any may
exists).
This result in a very significant speedup for repository with many old draft
like mozilla try.
runtime of perf:unbundle for a bundle constaining a single changeset (C code):
before 6.7 phase work: 14.497 seconds
before this change: 6.311 seconds (-55%)
with this change: 2.240 seconds (-85%)
Combined with the other patches that fixes the phases computation in the Rust
index, the rust code with a persistent nodemap get back to quite interresting
performances with 2.026 seconds for the same operation, about 10% faster than
the C code.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 22 Feb 2024 19:21:14 +0100] rev 51422
phases: apply similar early filtering to advanceboundary
advanceboundary is called the push's unbundle (but not the other unbundle) so
advanceboundary did not show up the profile I looked at so far.
We start with simple pre-filtering to avoid doing any work if we don't needs
too.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:09:25 +0100] rev 51421
phases: filter revision that are already in the right phase
No need to compute new roots if everything is already in order.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:05:29 +0100] rev 51420
phases: invalidate the phases set less often on retract boundary
We already have the information to update the phase set, so we do so directly
instead of invalidating the cache.
This show a sizeable speedup in our `perf::unbundle` benchmark on the
many-draft mozilla-try repository.
### data-env-vars.name = mozilla-try-2023-03-22-zstd-sparse-revlog
# benchmark.name = hg.perf.perf-unbundle
# bin-env-vars.hg.flavor = no-rust
# bin-env-vars.hg.py-re2-module = default
# benchmark.variants.
issue6528 = disabled
# benchmark.variants.revs = last-10
before: 2.055259 seconds
after: 1.887064 seconds (-8.18%)
# benchmark.variants.revs = last-100
before: 2.409239 seconds
after: 2.222429 seconds (-7.75%)
# benchmark.variants.revs = last-1000
before: 3.945648 seconds
after: 3.762480 seconds (-4.64%)
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:05:23 +0100] rev 51419
phases: incrementally update the phase sets when reasonable
When the amount of manual walking is small, we update the phases set manually
instead of computing them from scratch. This should help small update. The next
changesets will make this used more often by reducing the amount of full
invalidation we do on roots upgrade.
The criteria for using an incremental upgrade are arbitrary, however, it "should
never hurt".
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:01:33 +0100] rev 51418
phasees: properly shallow caopy the phase sets dictionary
We are about to increments the set more incrementally in some case, so we need
to make a proper shallow copy of it.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Feb 2024 14:42:13 +0100] rev 51417
phases: pass an unfiltered repository to _ensure_phase_sets
It seems better for such a low level function to be able to assume it operate on
a real repository.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:01:25 +0100] rev 51416
phases: drop set building in `hasnonpublicphases`
We don't actually use the set, so why do we ensure they are built?
(we should also clean up the use of repository argument but that's a quest for later).
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:59:28 +0100] rev 51415
phases: gather the logic for phasesets update in a single method
This logic is duplicated around for no good reason, we gather it in a single
place.
The conditional is the new function are a bit weird as we about going to extend it soon.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:58:54 +0100] rev 51414
phases: change the way we warm the phasecache in repocache
Same logic as for the previous chngeset. We are about to rename and change the
method used here.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:56:05 +0100] rev 51413
phases: use a more generic way to trigger a phases computation for perf
Querying the tip most revision will require the cache to warm the same as
calling the dedicated method. This avoid using a method that is mostly meant for
internal use and will be renamed in a coming changesets.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Feb 2024 12:01:09 +0100] rev 51412
phases: fix an overzealous invalidation of the phase sets
If `len(cl) == self._loadedrevslen` the cache is up to date.